- #1818 of 1822
-
Re: MY NEW 05 [evergreen]
by mickeysgal
-
Nov 07, 2009 (5:58 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: evergreen (Nov 05, 2009 6:31 pm)
Eevergreen....I don't think that I expect them to bend over backwards. I was actually hoping at the time that they would just cover a portion of it. The $8500 was to replace the cylinders. I am not a person that expects to get stuff for free. The more that I read on the posts the more and more I read that the engine has trouble. These cars aren't worth shit. I like the way it looks and the features that are on the car. I also think that an engine should last more then 103,000 miles. And yes I did take care of my car doing proper oil changes and tune ups, etc. I am just at a loss.
|
- #1819 of 1822
-
Re: MY NEW 05 [mickeysgal]
by evergreen
-
Nov 08, 2009 (10:07 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: mickeysgal (Nov 07, 2009 5:58 pm)
mickeysgal......I guess what I was trying to say was that a whole new motor costs less than $8500. Maybe it would be worth it if you planned to drive the car another 100,000 miles. Chances are your transmission would need to be replaced before then so you might be better off getting a different car.
Also, the cylinders are not something you replace. Cylinders are just holes in the block that provide a space for the pistons to travel. In a major overhaul, those holes would be re-bored and you would need a lot of other new parts to make it all run again. So the question you need to ask yourself is whether it is better to spend $8500 to get the motor overhauled or something less to get an entirely new engine. A new engine should last longer than an overhauled engine, too.
|
- #1820 of 1822
-
Re: MY NEW 05 [evergreen]
by mickeysgal
-
Nov 08, 2009 (8:07 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: evergreen (Nov 08, 2009 10:07 am)
Evergreen, funny thing is that I wouldn't trust that car no matter what was done to it. Like I said before, I expect an engine to last longer then it did. You do the scheduled maintenance on the vehicle, why? What for? And it isn't like that car is cheap to maintain. Sorry I don't mean to seem bitter, but this car is a sore subject. I would love to put it in the middle of a corn field and blow it up. Just for kicks! But I would be the one to get arrested since it isn't my field.
The part that really got me is the customer sevice center in california and the dealer had two different stories as to why my car was being rejected and they wouldn't help us.
We have recently found a used engine (see I asked about a new engine that was $10,500) to put in the vehilce for a hell of a lot less money then that. We are thinking about doing that and selling it. But how do I not feel guilty of selling the piece of shit? I don't know. It is kind of a catch 22.
|
- #1821 of 1822
-
Re: Suzuki Verona
by welington
-
Nov 15, 2009 (4:55 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 2124dolphin (Apr 23, 2009 3:52 pm)
my 2004 suzuki verona have 93,0000 mils, and i want to change the oil whats oil is the best for this milleage 10w-30 , 10w-40 , 5w-30 or 20-50 .?.
|
- #1822 of 1822
-
Re: Suzuki Verona [welington]
by evergreen
-
Nov 15, 2009 (9:38 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: welington (Nov 15, 2009 4:55 pm)
93,000 miles and time to change the oil. You would think a car could go at least 100,000 miles before changing the oil. I would suggest the 5w-30. I think that is what Suzuki put in it when they built it and I don't think that engine likes other weights.
|