You are here: Forums Sedans Chrysler 300/300C/300C SRT-8 Chrysler 300/300C

Chrysler 300/300C

4893 messages,  Last post on Jun 14, 2009 at 10:28 PM

You are in the Chrysler 300/300C/300C SRT-8 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Chrysler 300, Sedan

Messages Page 5 of 490 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 490 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#33 of 4893 it is official by ruski Oct 09, 2003 (4:46 pm)
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=6499
#34 of 4893 change by b4z Oct 10, 2003 (10:43 am)
Topic should be changed to 300C.
#35 of 4893 by kirstie_h HOST Oct 13, 2003 (4:23 am)
Done!
#36 of 4893 by ehaase Oct 13, 2003 (8:39 am)
I wish that the base engine in these cars was either the torquier 3.8L OHV V6 from the minivans or the 3.7L SOHC V6 from the trucks, with the 4.7L SOHC V8 being the midrange engine, instead of the 3.5L SOHC V6. I like the cars, but am concerned that visibility may be poor with those small windows.
#37 of 4893 ehaase 3.8 naw by jediknight2b Oct 16, 2003 (7:44 pm)
We have a Grand Caravan with the 3.8, I hate that motor. It is noisy, rattles, slower than the M by a long shot. I just put off getting a '04 M to "wait and see" what the "C" looks like in person. I think it is better looking in the darker colors than the light.
#38 of 4893 by ottowrkr Oct 18, 2003 (6:47 am)
jediknight2b, from what have seen I like the light colours better . But heck I really like them all
#39 of 4893 300? by guyquinn Oct 19, 2003 (8:54 pm)
If you placed a 300C and a 300M next to each other, you would have no idea they were from the same line. What's with completely throwing away the great 300M package and starting something totally new?
#40 of 4893 Maybe it's because........ by andys120 Oct 20, 2003 (5:36 am)
The 300C is a completely different kind of car with no relationship to the 300M. Replies to this message: velostic (Mar 07, 2005 5:26 pm) coby03 (Mar 07, 2005 7:49 pm) intrepidspirit (Mar 08, 2005 11:01 am) velostic (Mar 08, 2005 11:47 pm) and 1 more... dkrhardy (Mar 09, 2005 7:58 am)
#41 of 4893 300M vs. 300C by bmorisette Oct 20, 2003 (8:11 am)
guyquinn - I love the 300M but lets be honest, it is just a dressed up Chyrysler Concorde/Intrepid/LHS with a slightly better engine. Chrysler was whoring the heritage of the 300 series be reviving it for this car. I personally think the 300C is more deserving of the legacy of the 300 series. Who would of ever thought Detroit (via Hamburg, but who's counting) would ever produce a rear wheel drive V-8 car that wasn't designed with cop/cab duty in mind. I just had a terrible thought - imagine th 300C with a light bar. Crickey! Talk about menacing. If DC carries this concept to the Intrepid, they may enjoy some fleet sales to PD's around the country again.
#42 of 4893 300C by 300michael Oct 20, 2003 (10:41 am)
Is no more a Letter car then the 300M was. The letter cars were known for their style Cutting age designs. (the 300M fits this better then the 300C) which looks almost exactly like a Bently (except for the lo beam headlight). The Letter cars were known for their power. Here the 300C may have an edge over the M. They were also all two door covertables or coupes. Here Both fail. So is the 300C a true letter car, you have to say no. The 300HemiC was the only Car Chrysler produced in the last 10 years that could claim that title.

Messages Page 5 of 490 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 490 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Chrysler 300/300C/300C SRT-8 Chrysler 300/300C