Ask the Car People.SM


Subaru Baja Turbo or Toyota Tacoma 4x4 Double Cab? - READ ONLY

32 messages,  Last post on Jun 26, 2003 at 7:27 PM

You are in the Pickups - Archived Discussions Forum.

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Javascript runtime error--TypeError: obj has no properties-- no stack trace file was written discussion.

What is this discussion about? Subaru Baja, Toyota Tacoma, Exterior, Engine, Interior, Truck

Messages Page 2 of 4

#3 of 32 Baja vs. Tacoma Double Cab by rsholland

Jun 10, 2003 (7:56 pm)

As far as towing is concerned, both the Baja and Tacoma are limited to 1000 pounds if the trailer doesn't have brakes. This info is in the owners manual. I know it to be true, because I checked the owners manual of both vehicles last fall, with that very question.
 
As a daily driver the Baja would be much better. For truck-type chores, the Tacoma would be better.
 
Bob

#4 of 32 comparo by bkaiser1

Jun 11, 2003 (7:49 am)

I think 16" wheels are the smallest you can fit to the Baja due to the size of the brake rotors, in case you were thinking about putting 15" truck tires on. Also, when I was shopping the Tacoma Double Cab, they were auto only...no manual transmission was available with 4x4 at the time, maybe that's changed by now.
 
It's an interesting comparison between two really different vehicles...they're similar in theory, but both are going to drive VERY differently. I eliminated the Tacoma from my list of choices based on the drive -- I just don't like driving trucks on a daily basis and prefer the responsiveness of a car. I like my friends to own trucks, I'll take the car (or Baja, as the case might be)!
 
Brian

#5 of 32 Others to this comparo list... by rsholland

Jun 11, 2003 (7:59 am)

are all other small truck-based crew cabs, such as: Explorer Sport Trac, Frontier Crew Cab(s), and the S-10/Sonoma crew cabs.
 
I think it's safe to say the comments pertaining to the above, would be much the same as those pertaining to the Tacoma: Essentially it's truck vs. car; nonetheless...
 
Bob

#6 of 32 Thanks for the comments so far. by jimqpublic

Jun 11, 2003 (9:25 am)

I do appreciate your input and please keep them coming.
 
Generally what it comes down to is that the Subaru would be a much better vehicle for the 90% of driving that is on-road, not towing. The Toyota would be better off road or towing.
 
A few responses:
 
To KG11:
Yes, the rear overhang on the Baja is cause for concern. I might decide to give up the pickup bed for the shorter overhang of the Forester.
 
I currently tow the same trailer with a '96 Outback with MT which has only about 1/2 the torque of the new Turbo engine. That combined with probably the automatic transmission should allow much easier launches. With upgraded rear springs in our existing Outback plus sway control on the trailer it tows very well.
 
Tow ratings are not all equal. I seriously doubt that the Toyota can tow double the trailer that the Baja can with equal safety and control. The vehicles are rather similar in dimensions, power, and reliability. Softer rear suspension on the Subaru can be corrected with aftermarket springs.
 
Regarding liability in an accident, I keep hearing that argument but have never actually heard of actual cases. Nonetheless, our trailer will never exceed the 2400 pound rating on the Baja. BTW- Subaru rates its trailer towing capacity with the car at GVWR, not empty like most brands.
 
Regarding tow vehicle brakes, Ford's towing guide says it best where they note that the truck brakes are only rated to stop the truck at GVWR, not GCWR. Baja's payload capacity is only 350 pounds less than the Tacoma but it has much better brakes.
 
To RSHolland:
I completely agree with your last sentance in message #3.
 
Regarding trailer brakes, agreed- they're a must have. We have 10" electric brakes on the trailer controlled by a Tekonsha Prodigy. I've driven cars in the past that didn't brake as well as this trailer.
 
I have looked at the other small crew cabs and the Toyota came out on top of my truck list, especially since it's the only one made in California.
 
To BKaiser:
Good point about the 15" wheels maybe not fitting. I'll check this item. I was hoping to swap the 15" wheels from our existing car to this one.
 
Jim

#7 of 32 One question to ask yourself by saddaddy

Jun 11, 2003 (7:29 pm)

"Do I want a car or a truck?"
 
If you are considering a minivan, how could a 4x4 also be on your list to look at??????
 
Why not a Tacoma prerunner, why even worry about 4wd. Adds weight, gas cost, and insurance cost????
 
How could you consider towing a 2000 lb trailer with a CAR with a 2000 lb towing capacity???? I mean throw tongue weight and all that out the door -- those figures just don't add up. This issue kinda scares me. You say that the Tacoma can't tow twice as much b/c power ratings are similar. Hehe [shaking my head]-- SOOOO much more goes into it. Brakes, suspension, you could go on and on. Towing is an area where you want to incorporate as much room for error as possible. Come on, don't endanger others. Seriously, towing 80+% of the towing capacity is DANGEROUS, don't do it with ANY regularity.
 

#8 of 32 Lots of good advice by kg11

Jun 11, 2003 (10:09 pm)

I agree with almost all of it.
Cars don't tow like trucks.
Trucks don't ride/drive like cars.
 
Bob is right.Tacoma is probably the least car-like of the crew-cab minis.The Nissan and Sport-trac offer more car-like comfort.

#9 of 32 Regarding the "one question" by jimqpublic

Jun 12, 2003 (2:04 pm)

SADDADDY asked:
>"Do I want a car or a truck?"
>If you are considering a minivan, how could a 4x4 also be on your list to look at??????
 
Two very good questions. I'm trying to avoid prejudging the type of vehicle and instead look at the potential uses. I estimate that 90% of the time the new vehicle will be used for going to work, schlepping the family around, etc. 10% will be towing and 5% off-highway driving, with maybe 1% needing the greater offroad capabilities of something like the Tacoma.
 
The question I'm trying to answer is whether I'm willing to give up that 1% of offroad or the 5% off-highway while driving the new vehicle. If so there are several minivans that are quite capable at towing a trailer my size and better at family car duties.
 
If I were to buy (for the wife mostly) a minivan then I would take over the existing Subaru. A few thousand bucks in upgrades would make it great for off-highway driving and I'd only lose the ability to do the technical 4x4 stuff.
 
As hinted at above is of course my own family dynamics. If we buy a new truck it would be mine, a minivan hers, and a crossover we'll probably flip for it.
 
>Why not a Tacoma prerunner, why even worry about 4wd. Adds weight, gas cost, and insurance cost????
 
True, but the added cost of 4wd is only about 15% of the vehicle cost for much increased abilities, especially the safety cushion factor if you get stuck in the sand 100 miles from nowhere. The day-to day compromises are already made with the truck so why not go all the way?
 
>How could you consider towing a 2000 lb trailer with a CAR with a 2000 lb towing capacity???? I mean throw tongue weight and all that out the door -- those figures just don't add up. This issue kinda scares me. You say that the Tacoma can't tow twice as much b/c power ratings are similar. Hehe [shaking my head]-- SOOOO much more goes into it. Brakes, suspension, you could go on and on.
 
Please do. I should probably just shut up but I will go on. Brakes on the Subaru are much better than the Toyota. Suspension is tighter, especially with a few upgrades. Tire sidewalls are much shorter, making up for any lack of stiffness. Center of gravity is lower. The main issues where the truck is probably much better than the car are:
-Body/frame integrity. Truck construction may be more flexible but should have much more ultimate strength.
-Longer wheelbase/less overhang. Probably one of the biggest statistical advantages on the Toyota vs. the Subaru Baja.
-Rear Axle Weight Rating. I don't have the numbers in front of me but I assume the truck is much higher.
-Tire load ratings. Car is much lower but still well over any potential load.
-Transmission and final drive. Subarus are not designed for constant high loads however they have proven acceptable with up to 300 lb*ft of torque.
 
>Towing is an area where you want to incorporate as much room for error as possible. Come on, don't endanger others. Seriously, towing 80+% of the towing capacity is DANGEROUS, don't do it with ANY regularity.
 
Interestingly the tow ratings of the same vehicle lines are much different in other markets. That says the rating is not necessarily based on engineering data. In Australia the Subaru Outback rating increases to 3000 pounds with 300 pounds tongue weight while the Toyota decreases to 4000 & 400.
 
http://subaru.com.au/explore/outback/specifications.asp?item=1156- 0
http://www.hilux.toyota.com.au/Hilux/InDetail/Specifications/1,12- 89,8---24^19,00.html
 
As stated I tow this trailer with a slightly less capable predecessor of the same vehicle. It handles far better with the trailer than my brother's '00 Explorer with a similar weight trailer. The primary failing of my existing vehicle is the measly 130 lb*ft of torque.
 
I apologize if it sounds like I'm trying to justify a decision that hasn't been made yet. I did ask for input from both Subaru and truck enthusiasts and I appreciate your posts. I just start to get a little defensive when people try to compare their experiences with mortal cars to Subarus.
 
Jim

#10 of 32 Jim - Mortal Cars? by kg11

Jun 12, 2003 (5:28 pm)

I must confess ,the only time I've ridden in a Subaru was my mother's '79 wagon and I know the rest of the world has changed in 25 years so I have to ask a few questions.
 
300 lbs of torque at 3600 rpm is the peak output but what does it do at 1200? You won't be taking off from a dead stop at 3600 will you?
 
Is the turbo modle rated to tow at all? Most gas powered turbos aren't.
 
Most Subaru owners are brand zealots and it seems likely that the cars meet those drivers needs very well.It seems that you fit this catagory.Would you be happy with the "Outback" version of this car and on the rare occations that you need to heal something messy just make sure it's well contained or rent a utility trailer? It don't seem like you really want a pickup and the difference in fuel cost would offset trailer rental.

#11 of 32 Takeoff torque by jimqpublic

Jun 12, 2003 (6:50 pm)

KG11 said:
>300 lbs of torque at 3600 rpm is the peak output but what does it do at 1200? You won't be taking off from a dead stop at 3600 will you?
 
My mention of 300 lbs of torque was just to mention that the Subaru transmission CAN handle quite a bit on a modified engine.
 
The new Baja turbo will put out 230 lbs of torque at 3600 rpm's. Based on the single road test I've read of the vehicle with an automatic the torque converter stalls at about 3000 so it should pull quite well on an uphill start.
 
Jim

#12 of 32 Judging from the way by saddaddy

Jun 13, 2003 (6:13 pm)

you defend it in some pretty dead end issues, I would say that your mind seems pretty made up on the Subaru.
 
Whats with all the questions?
 
Just being a devil's advocate here, I guess. Good luck in you decision to purchase a weird looking car. I guess some folks find uses for them - I would've never guessed it. Oh well, Ive been wrong before. L8rs and good luck.

Messages Page 2 of 4

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement