Sign In Join 



Extended Warranties

2870 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 4:56 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Car Warranties

Edmunds article: Third-Party Extended Warranty Scams


Messages Page 7 of 288
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
288
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#58 of 2870
by q45man
Jul 10, 2003 (5:32 am)
Reply
You should study the dealer sites and trade publications to see how many US new car manufacturers have been cheating the dealers and the technicans on warranty work......allowing only 60% of the book time to complete the warranty. Ford near bankruptcy seems to be the most notable. But all brands have been doing this to pay for the increased incentives.
Technicans hate warranty work because it doesn't pay them enough to live as the reduced allowable time just get passed down to dealers who pass it down to techs. Worse the dealers don't get paid in full for sometimes 90 days and they are nickeled and dimed by regional manufactures agents.
 
When a warranty ticket is placed in the work box they [techs] all run for cover hoping against hope that some out of warranty [customer paid] job will show up. Some body finally picks it up, the guy that needs the money the most........the best techs are usually not subjected to this process unless the mortgage is due.
#59 of 2870
by cwadster
Jul 11, 2003 (1:01 pm)
Reply
This "book time" is the biggest bunch of BS out there. You know what happens when you go to get a water pump and a serpentine belt changed at the same time. You get charged "book time" for both a water pump replacement and a belt replacement, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE TO TAKE THE BELT OFF TO CHANGE THE WATER PUMP! Since they have to put a belt back on, you KNOW they are not putting the old one back on, then starting over to put the new belt on. Since they're doing the labor anyway, why not charge you just for the part. Basically, they're billing you twice to do the job once. Sound's pretty criminal to me. So get off the "they only pay xx% of book time for warranty repairs" soapbox. 50-60% of book time is very often all the time needed to do the job. And BTW, dealerships don't have mechanics anymore--they're just parts installers. They don't have the first clue how to diagnose a problem without a computer telling them what the problem is.
#60 of 2870
CW - by zueslewis
Jul 11, 2003 (1:16 pm)
Reply
in a "thief" shop, maybe, but otherwise, you're wrong.
 
I strongly suggest you look at a Chilton's or Mitchell manual. For instance, if you remove and reinstall the serpentine belt and it pays .8, then to do the water pump at 2.0 would have the .8 included.
 
I've spent what seems like thousands of hours in those two guides and can certainly speak from experience. If there's ever a question over time charged, simply ask to see the book and have them explain how they came up with the time. Of course, if they made a mistake in your favor, it's going to cost you some money.
 
Dealerships may have a FEW parts installers, but if your health insurance is paid up, walk into the Chevy dealer's service department I managed and say: "And BTW, dealerships don't have mechanics anymore--they're just parts installers".
#61 of 2870
by q45man
Jul 13, 2003 (5:39 am)
Reply
My point was not what a dealer charges you but how the mix of warranty work causes the prices they charge you to have to be higher than if they did not do warranty work.
 
Same problem with extended service contracts that may limit per hour chages and hours billed.
 
If a business needs x hours at y dollars per month if you are forced to take work that pays less per hour something has to give.
 
We solve the problem by using salary only techs [based on them working and billing 45 hours per week........we leave the load balancing and work efficiency up to the team which must averge 45 hours per week per member......the slackers get beat with a wrench by the other team members.
 
Believe me if dealers could dump warranty work they would.......as an independent dealing with the highest quality vehicles only, I thank my lucky stars we don't have to warranty Lexus or Infiniti and they are the best of the lot with Furd near the bottom.
#62 of 2870
We Loved Warranty by dunkmydonut
Jul 14, 2003 (6:17 pm)
Reply
In the late sixties early seventies I worked for three Chrysler dealers. First two were salary jobs, and the last one was flat rate. The way it worked was Joe Customer came in for warranty because his charging light was on. A common problem for that era. We knew before we drove it on to a lift that the voltage regulator was bad, but we checked it anyway. Every tech had a high tech voltage reg checker. A paper clip straightened which was connected to both connections on the regulator. This usually turned off the light, and a new regulator was installed in 30 seconds. It was held on by two screws..easy fix. This is when the story gets twisted a bit. Since we have the guy's work order, the service writer starts looking around for old parts. Anything will do. Chrysler insisted that old parts be returned for waranty claims. So all parts left over from regular repairs, were kept to return to chrysler as a warranty repair. We had old engines, trannies, diffs, you name it, t'was kept out back for parts needed to collect warranty claims. So the customer who wanted his charging system fixed was happy, and didn't even know he had his differential overhauled while he was in.
 
In fairness to dealers it should be noted that warranty work time rates were a bit tight. One example would be less than an hour to do a complete clutch R&R including pilot bushing. So I think each one was trying to keep the other from ripping them off. I don't blame those dealers who kept a used parts bin. You always lost money on warranty.
 
These days it looks like the name of the game is buyer beware. Hey,if you can't pay someone four grand to buy a Cavalier, something is very wrong.
 
Anyway I think every buyer feels like the bottom of the food chain. Too bad realy. What do you do when the customer is gone for good. Maybe 8 grand to buy your product will work. I think we might get to see.
#63 of 2870
Extended warranty by chaseboy
Jul 16, 2003 (4:59 am)
Reply
Hey everyone. Has anyone purchased an extended warranty for their A4 at the time of purchase or after? I have a 2001 A4 2.8 Quattro that I plan on keeping for a long time and would like to know if it is worth the cost of an extended warranty to cover it to 100k. I have communicated with the finance director at the dealership where I purchased the car and they said that a 6yr/100k extended warranty with $0 deductible would run around $2500. What do you all think is a fair price for this coverage, and is it worth getting, especially considering the dollar amount repairs would cost after the manufacturer's warranty is up. Thanks.
#64 of 2870
It seems that most people misunderstand by david1973
Jul 19, 2003 (1:42 am)
Reply
what warranties/insurance it is for. Almost all the time you will not get as much money out as you put in once you factor in the time value of the money ( ie the company you give the money to gets to keep all the investment income). What it does do is limit your risk. In theory you are only on the hook for the 1000 bucks for your policy. In the simplest given 5 people, 4 will make no claims and "waste" their 1000 bucks while 1 of the people will make a claim for 5000 bucks and profit by 4000 bucks. The consumer has to weight the worst case (probably something like the value of the car) versus the best case (zero claims) and decide which end you expect the car to be closer to. It really doesn't matter if you buy a reliable honda or some unreliable make. That reliability gets factored into the how much the policy costs. If all Hondas were bullet proof through 100K miles, it would cost Honda zero cents to off a warranty up to that level and would give them a competitive edge. Whenever you see a manufactor reducing the warranty (happens all the time in consumer electronics) and then justifying by saying there products are so good they don't need a warranty, be afraid. Very afraid:)
 One advantage of not buying the policy (either from the dealer or 3rd party) at the time you purchase the car is that you get the manufactors warranty period to decide how well the car you bought was put together. Obviously past performance is no guarantee of future results but my experience has been cars that give you problem early on give you problems later in life so in that case buying the policy may be a prudent way to hedge your bets if you don't want to trade it in right away. Of course in exchange for this period you do give up a bit of leverage if you are planning on buying a manufactor extended warrente.
#65 of 2870
Insurance by jsylvester
Jul 19, 2003 (8:43 am)
Reply
Yes, it is true that insurance companies take your premiums and invest them to make additional revenue. In theory, in a competitive business model, those earnings are already calculated actuarily into the insurance rates one pays. The tanking of the stock market is one reason insurance rates have been rising.
 
There is also other factors that are considered in setting rates. Depending on the policy, some vehicles will never make claims due to being wrecked and totaled, the owner dies, the policyholder fails to maintain the vehicle, the vehicle is sold and the warranty is not/cannot be transferred.
 
In my situation, one major repair in 100,000 miles will cover the cost of the warranty. I do agree, that dealing with warranty companies and mechanics are such a hassle (along with the huge losses in the stock market the last few years) that the money in the mason jar in the backyard may be a good idea.
#66 of 2870
by q45man
Jul 19, 2003 (12:15 pm)
Reply
If you are a company like Furd, and have increased incentives to $3450 to just move cars, where do you save money [get some back] by paying the dealer and his employees LESS on warranty work........unless the government will bail you out...[No Japanese will do it too much liability] ......finally they are talking about firing 2400 white collars before end of year. [today's news]
 
Their labor and pension costs [mostly unfunded] are killing them as is their lack of productivity.
 
http://www.fordtechs.com/survey.asp
http://flatratetech.com/pub102.htm
http://flatratetech.com/pub104.htm
 
What does all this have to do with warranty, the unions are in process of organizing technicans.
 
Doubtful that they could cheapen the line more than they already have done......Paper and glue cars are next you really don't need metal.

Messages Page 7 of 288
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
288
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement