Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan
5511 messages, Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 9:26 AM
You are in the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: akirby (Jun 22, 2008 6:04 am) consider the malibu 'cause the lack of one single feature. |
|
The pic below is of the non-nav center stack in the new Flex. Since the center stack in those Fusion spy shots and the center stack of the nav equipped Flex are identical (save for the bezels and trim), I think this is what we'll be seeing in the Fusion as well.  Here's the Fusion spy shot:  Here's a larger Fusion spy shot pic so you can see the detail better and compare it to the pic from the Flex. Note that the buttons and knobs are all identical in the nav equipped versions. Link to pic. Here's the nav equipped Flex. 
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: baggs32 (Jun 22, 2008 6:13 pm) Does anyone have any insight into this? I have read speculation that a 3.0L based on the 3.5L is in the works, but nothing concrete.
|
|
|
Replying to: igozoomzoom (Jul 19, 2008 11:20 pm) |
|
|
|
|
about 4 months ago, i trade my 04 focus for a fusion. i also have an explorer. one of the reasons(justifications) was that for 4 people we had to take the explorer on trips. so i decided to give up some every day gas mileage for better than the explorer on trips. i also was looking for a car that was awd and i could fit in the back seat(don't fit in the back of a focus). originally, i thought i would be getting a small suv. when i started there was about 3k miles on the car. the trip was 4 people from central ct to western pa and back. lots of hills, highest point 2250 ft above sea level. we ran the a/c about 75% of the time and averaged 26 mpg. the explorer would have averaged about 18. i sat in the back for a couple 3 hours stints. there was enough head room and plenty of leg room for me(over 6ft). even when my wife was driving 80, there wasn't much wind or road noise and my mother seated next to me in the back, had no clue we were going that speed. anyways, i think it worked out pretty well and will only get better.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: explorerx4 (Jul 22, 2008 2:09 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jul 23, 2008 8:35 am) |
|
|
|
|
Autoblog published 2010 Milan and Funsion spy photos http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/14/spy-shots-2010-mercury-milan-is-up-next/ 
|
|
|
Correctly or not, I have the impression that the Mercury line is supposed to be slightly more upscale/polished/whatever than their Ford counterparts. But are there any specifics when comparing the Fusion and the Milan that would support this notion? - Robert -
|
|
|
Replying to: ponggod (Aug 27, 2008 9:14 am) The future plan for Mercury is to sell smaller premium vehicles while Lincoln focuses on larger premium vehicles. The Mercury Sable is gone after next year along with the Mountaineer and there are no Mercury versions of the new Flex e.g.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mercury Milan
2010 Ford Fusion
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
