Sign In Join 



Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan

5511 messages,  Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 9:26 AM

You are in the Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Mercury Milan, Ford Fusion, Sedan


Messages Page 494 of 552
1
...
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
...
552
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4930 of 5511
Re: fusion sales? [walterquint] by jeffyscott
Aug 01, 2007 (7:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: walterquint (Jul 31, 2007 6:00 pm)

The article says: With the Fusion, Ford is too closely copying a Camry.
 
Uhh...how exactly is it copying a Camry???
 
Did Ford expect or plan to sell 300,000 Fusions per year? Are they even capable of producing that many? I don't think so.
 
It isn't about the number of units it is about whether a profit is being made. I don't know how many units they need to sell to generate adequate profits and I am certain the writer of the article has no clue either.
#4931 of 5511
Re: fusion sales? [walterquint] by mschmal
Aug 01, 2007 (8:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: walterquint (Jul 31, 2007 6:00 pm)

This article is typical of someone who knows nothing about the auto industry but thinks they are an expert.
 
To compare Fusion sales with Impala and Camry sales without breaking out the percentage sold to fleet is very misleading
#4932 of 5511
Re: fusion sales? [mschmal] by walterquint
Aug 01, 2007 (2:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mschmal (Aug 01, 2007 8:07 am)

I agree. Comparing Fusion sales to Impala sales is misleading. The Impala is one of the most fleet-saturated cars on the market. Technologically, it's a dinosaur compared with the Fusion--pushrod 6cyl, ancient 4sp automatic, flabby seats, old dash.
 
I don't understand why the article's author suggested that the Fusion should be marketed to so-called "blue collar types" rather than the Camry crowd. Heck, an entire auto division had that target market--it was called Oldsmobile. And where is Olds now??? (Actually, it's in my driveway.)
#4933 of 5511
Re: fusion sales? [walterquint] by savetheland
Aug 01, 2007 (4:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: walterquint (Jul 31, 2007 6:00 pm)

I do not think this guy has a clue what is going on. And what is that "blue collar" vs "white collar" thing? Why professor is considered as "blue color" mentality if he buys American car? May be it is more "higher quality but more expensive" vs "lower quality but cheaper". Fusion actually suffers from "low quality percerption" interior design. And Ford needs to develop new engines faster.
#4934 of 5511
What a joke article by scape2
Aug 01, 2007 (6:02 pm)
Reply
This is reaching pretty far to call the Fusion a flop. If you look at sales for June most car makers had a slow month. Even Toyota and Honda had slow sales!
This is yet another bashing of Ford Motor Company by the media.
I'm sure most know how the media puts the Fusion/Milan down for having a "weak" engine. I was looking through my Motor Trend September edition. They have 2008/09 new cars. Looking at the Acura line up the RL does 0-60 in 7.0, the TL in 6.9, the TSX in 8.3 seconds. (automatic transmissions).. The Fusion in 7.2! yet they call the Fusion weak!!!??? More media bashing. In fact if you look through each sedan and compare 0-60 times the Fusion is quicker than more sedans than you would think.
#4935 of 5511
'auto-lock' feature by keeferb
Aug 02, 2007 (9:02 am)
Reply
My wife recently took a test drive of an '07 Fusion AWD. She really liked the car. The one thing that bothered her was the auto-locking of the doors after you get in. She has this phobia of getting in an accident or some other situation and then not being able to get the kids out of the back seat. She asked the the salesperson if this is something that can be disabled, but he didn't know. Does anyone know if this is something that can be disabled? I guess I'm also curious as to what the purpose of this feature is to begin with?
 
Thanks in advance for any info.
#4936 of 5511
Re: 'auto-lock' feature [keeferb] by bdyment
Aug 02, 2007 (9:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: keeferb (Aug 02, 2007 9:02 am)

This should be able to be disabled by the dealer or it may even be in the owner's manual. As far as the purpose goes--it was to prevent unwanted opening of the doors by outsiders--in case the driver and passengers forgot to lock their doors. I dislike this option and will not own a car in which the auto door lock "feature" can't be deleted or over ridden.
#4937 of 5511
Re: 'auto-lock' feature [keeferb] by brucelinc
Aug 02, 2007 (9:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: keeferb (Aug 02, 2007 9:02 am)

You can definately disable that feature. Page 86 and 87 of the owners manual provide instructions for the process.
#4938 of 5511
Re: 'auto-lock' feature [bdyment] by jaxs1
Aug 02, 2007 (10:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: bdyment (Aug 02, 2007 9:43 am)

I hate cars that don't have the autolock feature. It is so easy to forget to lock the doors and have someone walk up to your car and open your door or passenger side door from outside if you forget. Even if you remember, it's a pain to keep doing this when it could be automatic.
 
I've seen police chases on TV where the bad guy runs up to a car stopped in traffic, opens the door and throws the driver out into the street. One time the driver was still tangled in the seatbelt and got dragged outside the car.
#4939 of 5511
Re: 'auto-lock' feature [jaxs1] by keeferb
Aug 02, 2007 (6:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jaxs1 (Aug 02, 2007 10:45 am)

Thanks for the info. I called the service manager at the dealership and he confirmed that it can be disabled. It's just a matter of opinion on which way you want it.
 
Thanks for all the info.

Messages Page 494 of 552
1
...
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
...
552
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement