You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac STS/STS-V
Cadillac STS/STS-V: What's New for 2007?

1325 messages, Last post on Apr 08, 2009 at 7:01 AM
You are in the Cadillac STS/STS-V Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Lincoln has been left behind... most of their lineup doesn't match up to Cadillac. Examples: XLR vs ???, CTS-V vs.???, SRX vs.??? (not the Aviator - I like it and have driven 'em both, they're not all that similar), '05 STS vs ??? Not that Lincoln has to - Ford has Jaguar to carry that banner. Volvo and Acura aren't even close. Any of the four Cadillac models I just mentioned are far superior to anything those two make. |
|
| I hope the Cadillac CTS-V, SRX, XLR and STS are superior to similar models from Acura...they cost a whole lot more money. | |
|
"they cost a whole lot more money." Exactly... Acura is not a player. |
|
|
|
| I think Acura is a player, especially since they have the MDX and TL. | |
|
"I think Acura is a player, especially since they have the MDX and TL." Sure, compared to Volvo. The MDX is so respected that it's not even included in comparos with the SRX, because the testers know it's not in the SRX league. And so it will be with Acuras vs. the STS. When Acura builds a proper RWD sports sedan, then they're a player... something with a V8 would be nice, too. |
|
|
Cadillacs are more expensive than Acuras, but you'd never guess it by looking at their interiors. The TSX and TL have much better finished interiors than the CTS. Heck, the Accord EX has a higher quality interior than the CTS. It's the same with the MDX versus the SRX. Right now, that is Cadillac's major weakness. They got the chassis and drivetrains right...now they need to give those interiors a major makeover. |
|
|
|
|
I do not see how you could compare an LS to CTS. LS went up aganist Catera. After the Catera was dropped It was left alone looking for competation. Lincoln has always been unable to find a place btw Buick and Cadillac to fight its battles. Mercury has never been a contender. At least not in the 90's. They (mercuries) are just Ford XLE's (read Camry top of the range XLE with Leather) By the way. It looks very much like the outgoing 7 Series BMW 7 Series LS Lincoln has no CTS equivalent. The LS is a good car but its in a class of its own. That is beside the point. The LS does not measure up to the outgoing SLS, STS with Northstar. The LS is in my opinion a better car than the outgoing STS, SLS, (Deu to RWD) but that is still not the point. The point is that the LS is a 3 Series wanna be |
|
|
|
|
mbukukanyau: I know the LS can't even start to compete with the CTS, but people think so and they would cross-shop the two. LS is very outdated too. eaton53: I wonder how the STS will stack up against the upcoming RL. Rumor has it the RL will have a 300HP V6, a hybrid V6, and maybe an optional V8. Whew, this segment is tough!!! :o |
|
|
|
| The RL will go up against the Infiniti Q45. Not aganist STS, E Class or 5 series and Jarguar Type S | |
|
|
| Wait, what's the difference??? I thought the RL will stay below or around 50K..just like the 5-series and E-Class. The TL competes with the 3-series, CTS, C-Class, etc...so I'm guessing it's only logical that the RL competes with the 5-series, E-Class, STS, etc. Hey, I maybe wrong!! | |
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Cadillac STS/STS-V
Cadillac STS/STS-V: What's New for 2007?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac STS
2009 Cadillac STS-V



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic