Last post on Jun 19, 2013 at 2:41 PM
You are in the BMW X3 & X5
What is this discussion about?
BMW X3, SUV
#2962 of 4187 Re: CPO BMWs [cotmc]
Oct 15, 2007 (7:06 am)
Every time I say I will hold onto my car for several years, something else comes along! I haven't held onto one car for more than 3 years since 1993.
I'm getting better at keeping my cars, but I relapse from time to time...
As it stands now, I have one car that I've kept for almost twelve years(1995 318ti Club Sport) and one I've kept for five years(1999 Wrangler Sahara). My wife still likes her CPO 2004 X3 2.5 that she acquired in December of 2005, so it will remain in the fleet for the forseeable future as well. I can't imagine selling off the Mazdaspeed3 unless I hit Powerball, in which case I'd probably get a new M3 sedan AND an Exige(crosses fingers)...
#2963 of 4187 Re: Here's the deal [cotmc]
by kyfdx@Edmunds HOST
Oct 15, 2007 (7:40 am)
215 HP.. That is the 3.0 litre motor from the US '06 325i...
For 2007, US models were upgraded it to 230hp for the 328i..
#2964 of 4187 Re: Here's the deal [kyfdx]
Oct 16, 2007 (8:51 am)
Yes, that makes sense! I forgot about that one. Wasn't the '06 US 330i also a 3.0 liter motor delivering 255hp?
That still brings up one question: Why was the base '06 3.0 liter only 215hp instead of 225hp? The previous e46 platform as well as the X3 platform had a 3.0 liter at 225hp. I understand the engine was modified for '06, but rarely do we ever see a newer version of an engine, same displacement, putting out less power than the previous version.
Was it simply a case of BMW wanting to maintain a large buffer of horsepower differential between the 325i and the more costly 330i? It seems like Audi/VW was doing this in the US market with their 1.8T engines, back when the Jetta was rated at 180hp, but the Passat and A4 were rated at only 150 or 170 hp -- all with the same 1.8T engine. The models which also offered a more expensive V6 engine had the 1.8T version rated at lower power output.
#2965 of 4187 Re: Here's the deal [cotmc]
by kyfdx@Edmunds HOST
Oct 16, 2007 (11:08 am)
The 225 HP 3.0 litre from the E46 has multiple intake runners, while the new 3.0 litre in the 325i had a single intake.. (plus, it was a whole new engine.. and more fuel efficient).
Anyway, who knows what the real numbers were/are.. It's pretty easy to massage them up or down 5-10 HP for marketing reasons...
Just like the model numbers... 325, 328, 330, 335 all had 3.0 litre engines..
I do think the horsepower wars are a little silly, though...
Oct 16, 2007 (5:53 pm)
My wife really loves her 2005 X3 (virtually all options, the 225HP 6 and a stick shift too.) However, she has tested about everything you can imagine that might even be remotely considered a competitor. She's looked at vehicles, CUV's, SAV's & SUV's from many makers and in prices that seem to range from -$5,000 to +$10,000 difference of the current ('08) X3. With 6 lease payments left, the heat is on, since she will almost certainly be ordering a car and ordering it with a 90 day lead time.
The $44K Acadia? The $44K Tourag? The $39,950 LR? The $58K Q7? An as yet to be seen EX35 from Infiniti or Q5 from Audi? Something perhaps from SAAB, Volvo, ja?
We've driven Acuras, Infinitis, Lincolns, Cadillacs and Mazadas of all ilks and seemingly all price ranges. Hell we even drove the Hyundais of late vintage.
Along comes the new (but not too new) Jeep Grand (with a Hemi no less). Stop the madness -- pick something, get to know it, love it, choose it, get it.
OK, so the Acadia wins in several categories, but the engine needs to be the one in the new Cadillac CTS DI, not the anemic thing standard (now) in the Acadia.
The Land Rover is quite entertaining, as is the RDX and the MDX, etc.
Ah but the power of the Jeep is, er, entoxicating.
Well let's price one of these puppies:
A pretty much all out X3, as she wants it, is $49K. The Jeep is $42K. The Jeep is dicounted $4500 if you can walk and chew gum at the same time.
The Jeep is $777 per month for a 39 month lease, 15K miles, no cap cost reduction required by us.
The Jeep, at that price does NOT have Sat Radio or Sat Nav.
The X3 with everything but the sport package, but WITH the SAV package for 36 months is $636, same deal otherwise -- don't even have to ask for anything.
If we "countered" on the Jeep, would they drop it to 36 months, add sat radio and nav and let it go for $636 per month? Naaaah.
On the other hand, if we asked for a little better deal on the X3, would THAT be a likely outcome. Probably -- plus they'll let her out of her lease 3 months early.
It is a sinister plot, I tell you.
Not that I, for one, would mind one little bit, upgrading from a somewhat more crude and underpowered 2005 X3 to a hardly at all crude and reasonably powered 2008 X3.
I just wish the X3 had voice command at least for the in car phone system that works, oh so well, even in the 2005 version.
Even the Acadia was more than the Bimmer for pity's sake.
Damn subvented leases -- you would have to be out of your mind to buy one of these things with the lease program soooo "supported."
Er, no offense, if you buy, it is, YOUR money.
#2967 of 4187 Re: They may have her AGAIN! [markcincinnati]
Oct 16, 2007 (6:25 pm)
You gotta cut back on the caffein, Mark!
#2968 of 4187 Re: They may have her AGAIN! [bodble2]
Oct 16, 2007 (6:38 pm)
It is a fine wine from Italy, not a coffee from Columbia.
But seriously, we drove the new X3, Bronze, two tone leather, SAV, Winter, Sound, Nav, Premium, Xenon, Parktronic, 6 speed steptronic packages, etc -- it was substantially upgraded in the interior and the power of that 3.0si was at least very adequate.
The VW Toureg with a few packages on it might be a bit better vehicle -- but then again there is that unbeatable BMW customer good will and good service that covers anything and everything.
#2969 of 4187 Re: They may have her AGAIN! [markcincinnati]
Oct 16, 2007 (6:59 pm)
"...the power of that 3.0si was at least very adequate."
Just adequate? I've been hoping that it would be more "vigorous". "Adequate" conjures up images of....RX350, MDX, ....
#2970 of 4187 Re: They may have her AGAIN! [bodble2]
Oct 17, 2007 (4:16 am)
I was toying with saying "ample" -- but the truth of the matter is, I have driven the 3.0 turbo, and the 260HP non-turbo, nice as it is, isn't quite in the same league.
Coupled with the 6 speed auto, the 3.0si's output is "more than adequate."
That's about as far as I can take it -- the fact is, the landscape keeps changing and what was once adequate or ample, loses out as technology marches forward.
The 2005 225HP X3 with the stick shift was "adequate" at the time -- now, not so much. . . .
#2971 of 4187 Re: They may have her AGAIN! [markcincinnati]
by kyfdx@Edmunds HOST
Oct 17, 2007 (7:35 am)
Manual tranny X3? How many miles on that puppy?
Trading at The BMW Store? That could be my next car..