Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3
3284 messages, Last post on Nov 11, 2009 at 12:36 PM
You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Aug 01, 2006 8:02 am) $900 for front brakes on an X5? That's ridiculous. Your friend gor hosed. Big time. I hope the Service Advisor kissed him and sent flowers the next day. My wife's E39 got new rotors, pads and parking brake shoes just before the PO traded it and our local BMW dealer charged him  $1000. A good indie BMW shop would be even less. My shop charged $550 for a four wheel brake job(BMW rotors, Axxis Pads) on my Club Sport, including a brake fluid flush using ATE Super Blue DOT 4 fluid. These Germans, all Germans in fact, ARE breathtakingly expensive to maintain. God help you financially if something breaks (not that I am suggesting I think something WILL break.) In my twenty three years of BMW ownership I haven't found that to be the case. Maintenance and repair costs for my 1995 104K Club Sport have averaged a bit under $40 per month. My wife's 1997 E39 hit 130K about a few months before we sold it and the maintenance and repair costs averaged $80 month. The only reason we sold it was because my wife wanted an X3 and at the time I needed to keep my US built Jeep TJ for PR reasons. In retrospect, I really wish that I had kept the 5er. FWIW, the new owner loves it(she bought it to replace her 300K E34 525i). Looking on the bright side, I'm now able to ditch the Jeep and very soon it is going on the block so that I can find a nice E36 or E46 to serve as my work sled. My E24 M6 was a bit pricey to run, but even then the costs weren't that much out of line. I believe the most I ever spent on one shop visit was around $1200- and that covered replacement of the radiator, water pump, and PS pump. I still kick myself for letting that one go-though I did drive it for three years with zero depreciation. As for my wife's 2004 X3, I'm not considering an extended maintenance plan. Nothing that I've learned about the car leads me to believe that it will be all that expensive to run. That said, I do think that the newer gadget filled cars such as the E60 and E65/66 will be expensive to maintain-primarily due to the sheer amount of their on-board electronics. Normal scheduled maintenance costs should not be that bad. In any event, keep talking up that "breathtakingly expensive" angle every chance you get; it might help depress the market for the non-CPO cars I'm looking at 
|
|
|
Replying to: driver100 (Jul 31, 2006 11:44 pm) Copy cat Korean makes look similar now in design and size, and new offerings from Acura are less expensive with more wiz bang techno for the money. I keep reading in magizines whether applicable to the X3 or 3 series that: " for north of 40grand it does not have Navagation!!!" I read this over and over and somehow this has been the "IT" interior accessory! For me, I don't own a X3 but might in a few months. Im glad the competition is available whether real or percieved. It keeps prices down and BMW to update its offering. For a modest increase in MSRP, the new engine and interior is a good value. Maybe the incentives will return if its not a hot seller. Besides, who else is going to make me a manual transmission vehicle like this? Let the general buying public froth over GPS and boy racer video graphic glowing instriment dials. I'll take naturally inspired over turbo any day, row my own gears, and yes pay 10 grand more to get it! A 5 series wagon will cost me almost 20 grand more than a similar equipped X3. Same engine, same xdrive! Not its not as refined but it represents a good value to me. Question is if the 3 sports wagon ups its horsepower from the 325ix to the new 328ix as will be in the coupe, for the same money forgo the space for the drivablity of a 328 sportwagon for the same money? Or, with a spring time refresh of the 5 series make it interesting. I don't mind going above budget if its sweet enough to do so. 530ix sedan would work for me! |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: div2 (Aug 01, 2006 9:24 am) The total costs that were attributable to the brakes were over $800, he now informs me and the remaining charge was for an oil and filter change -- but the out of pocket at 54K miles was $900, he says. The amount for the brakes "exceeded" $800 -- he says he thinks the brake portion of the bill was "about $830 or $840." The work was done at the BMW dealer and he was fine with the price -- until he figured out it was ONLY for the fronts. We have had Audi's, BWW's and VW's -- and when the work is performed out of warranty and after the service advantage has expired, it "costs $100" just to say "hello" to the service tech (on the phone!) Now, yes, that is for effect -- but the spirit of what I am suggesting is dead on. I asked my friend "would you have the CPO'd version were you able to rewind to 49,999 miles and make the decision then?" He says he even tried to get them to take the money for the extended service/warranty at 54K and BMW's policy won't allow it (and I do think that is true, Audi is the same way.) Hosed? Probably. But he had never had anything other than free service on this vehicle and other than the fact that the brake service light came on on the dash, he said the car has been flawless and he would get another one. He now knows whatI mean when I say "breathtakingly expensive." His main issue was that he thought they said all four brakes, not just the fronts. Audis do NOT require new rotors at the first pad replacment -- they can be "turned." I assume BMW's way is superior -- I know it is more expensive. I would go with the extended packages at either Gold or Platinum level and "fughettaboudit!"
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bargamon (Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am) 15,000 miles per year with no money down, it is $581 per month including tax. It is very attractive in and out in high gloss black with a terracotta sport leather interior. The dash board plastic is too grainy -- a nit. The 2007's have (or so the spy shots show) this addressed. The 2007's also have body color bumpers and at least a 255HP engine and either 6spd auto or manual. 19" wheels are also an option. The thing drives like a BMW CAR with sport suspension -- i.e., it is a firm and well controlled ride. The uprated sound system and AGAIN ALL the high zoot options makes this little ugly duckling darn near a beautiful black, shiny black, swan. It performs well and will only be better with the new interior and uprated engine and transmission. This vehicle will most likely not appeal to someone who likes Acura's, Lexus cars or Cadillacs. And, one would assume, vice versa in terms of appeal. It is a German "car" wrapped in the body of an S A V, not S U V. It never was a truck nor a Jeep. If you have been a BMW fan -- however -- you may find a lot to like. |
|
|
Replying to: markcincinnati (Aug 01, 2006 11:02 am) BMW dealers replace the rotors with each set of pads because in some cases the rotors will wear below their minimum thickness before a second set of pads is worn out. On my BMWs-including the tracked cars-I've always replaced the rotors at every other pad change with no problems whatsoever. We have had Audi's, BWW's and VW's -- and when the work is performed out of warranty and after the service advantage has expired, it "costs $100" just to say "hello" to the service tech (on the phone!) Now, yes, that is for effect -- but the spirit of what I am suggesting is dead on. That's funny. My dealer only charged $110 to change the ATF AND the final drive oil in the E39. I doubt that the Jiffy Boobs would do it for much less. The service techs must see you and your friend coming. He now knows whatI mean when I say "breathtakingly expensive." He obviously doesn't know how to find a good independent BMW tech. On the later BMWs my indie shop charges around $95 for an Oil Service, $250 for an Inspection I, and $450 for an Inspection II- and that includes services that BMW no longer calls for, such as changing the gearbox and final drive oil as well as fitting a new fuel filter. In most cases, I will usually perform the Oil Service and Inspection I myself, but even if I had to pay the added $$$ for labor the prices aren't bad at all. I would go with the extended packages at either Gold or Platinum level and "fughettaboudit!" I prefer to spend my disposable income on much more entertaining items, such as my Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica. And of course there's my M1 Acquisition Fund. Now that is one BMW that IS expensive to maintain. But who cares?
|
|
|
Replying to: div2 (Aug 01, 2006 11:52 am) mark156, "Mercedes-Benz M-class (ML320, ML350, ML500 and ML55) 2005 and earlier" #7885, 18 Oct 2005 5:48 pm Gotta pay to play I guess. In other news, the SUV sales slump has hit BMW too: BMW July U.S. sales fall 12% as SUVs weigh (MarketWatch) |
|
|
Replying to: bargamon (Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am) That being said I do have one pratical question...my last car was a 5 speed manual and the X3 is 6 speed. The feel is very different though and I'm having trouble getting into first geaer without lurching. It's no problem if I take it real slow, but that's not always practical or desirable. What's the trick with this car or does it just take practice? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: stevenyc (Aug 02, 2006 5:57 am) It ain't no thang! What color interior? Premium, sport, navi, sat radio, Servotronic? Details, please! Congrats. 
|
|
|
Replying to: stevenyc (Aug 02, 2006 5:57 am) I for one dig what Chris Bangle has done and its obvious the sales are very strong the last few years. I like the X3 alot and think it looks much nicer than the Infinity fx, the Lexus RX, but not the Mercedes ML. BUt there are not that many choices in the Smallish Suv market but Mazda and Acura are entering this year with nice attractive ones that will sell at about 10k under. The Lexus to me is an awful vehicle to look at. It drives nice, but read my opinion on lexus in other forums. They are boring! Shifting will take you some practice if you have not done it for a while or are new to it. Those smooth launches become a habit after a while. |
|
|
Replying to: stevenyc (Aug 02, 2006 5:57 am) I take exception too! What looks better??? First, it is the perfect size. The styling as with almost all BMW's and MB's will look good 10 and probably 20 years from now. It'simple, makes sense, no faddish items that you will get tired of. My X3 is white and although I am in the minority I like the contrasting bumpers. The X3 looks like it is in motion when it is standing still. The kicked up rear quarter window is ingenious, it is a bold styling cue that alters the whole styling of the car, and is getting copied a lot. Note too, large windows all around, you don't see that too much any more (you can actually put your arm on the window sill). Great sightlines to the fenders and in being able to judge the rear end. I can't think of a vehicle that has all that, and that just covers the style.  From the headlights and grill to the rear tailights it is as good as an SUV gets! (Personally and styling is of course personal, I don't think MB's Porche or the new Audi come close for styling) |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs BMW X3 & X5 BMW X3
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 BMW X3
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
