Sign In Join 



BMW X3

3287 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 6:14 PM

You are in the BMW X3 & X5 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? BMW X3, SUV


Messages Page 279 of 329
1
...
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
...
329
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2779 of 3287
Re: 2007 BMW X3 v. RAV4 V6 [steve_] by driver100
Jul 26, 2006 (10:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jul 26, 2006 7:38 am)

But, he advises selling them after the free repair period (4 years, right?) since after warranty repairs tends to be expensive. 4 years is right.
 
I might do that, on the other hand, the older BMW's get, the more beautiful they become (better with age). Few cars look better than a 10 or 20 year old BMW or Mercedes. So, you could save money or at least have a real show piece and it might cost less than trading every 3 or 4 years.
#2780 of 3287
Re: 2007 BMW X3 v. RAV4 V6 [driver100] by tidester HOST
Jul 26, 2006 (9:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: driver100 (Jul 26, 2006 4:14 am)

Maybe it comes down to this.
 
Perhaps the analogy with watches isn't really all that good. I can think of only three criteria that are important in deciding which watch to buy - reliability, cost and style - in that order. On the other hand, there are probably dozens of factors that go into one's car purchasing decisions.
 
I have yet to see a single web site devoted to comparing watch brands (there may be but I just haven't seen any) while automotive sites come in all sizes, flavors and hues.
 
tidester, host
#2781 of 3287
Re: 2007 BMW X3 v. RAV4 V6 [bodble2] by driver100
Jul 26, 2006 (1:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Jul 26, 2006 8:13 am)

Really? You really think the manufacturer "respects" you, cares about you, wants you to be safe and sound, nice and happy?
 
Yes I do. i think European car makers take pride in their craftsmanship. If it didn't sell more cars they might not bother, but I think they do want to make the car as technologically advanced and engineered the best it can be within the price range. I believe this because they study accidents to try and make the car more crash worthy.
 
On the other hand you have a Monte Carlo which doesn't even offer side-airbags. They just have to try to sell what they can and not spend any money to update it.
 
I like the idea of that round red light on the hood though!!
 
My brother tried all kinds of smaller cars. Even Toyotas you had to pay extra for ABS. He bought a Jetta because ABS is standard equipment. VW could have made the car cheaper by leaving ABS as an option, but I think it would be embarassing to them.
 
I'm not saying BMW cares about me really when it comes down to it. But, I think in the case of the Monte Carlo they show no respect or pride in their workmanship if they sell a car without as many safety devices as possible in this day and age. I give VW a lot of credit for making ABS standard equipment even though others leave it out to make their price lower. It isn't really respect for their customers in the sense that they really care, but they take enough pride...or maybe don't want to be embarrassed, that they try to make a car as safe as possible, whereas GM can put a car on the market which shows total disrespect for the customer.
#2782 of 3287
Re: 2007 BMW X3 v. RAV4 V6 [tidester] by driver100
Jul 26, 2006 (1:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tidester (Jul 26, 2006 9:36 am)

watch to buy - reliability, cost and style - in that order. On the other hand, there are probably dozens of factors that go into one's car purchasing decisions
 
I think you are right on with this synopsis, I will keep it mind when I buy my next watch!!
#2783 of 3287
I won't repeat the post. . . by markcincinnati
Jul 28, 2006 (11:05 am)
Reply
. . .but I started a very very generalized thread of conversations and perhaps some slight controversy over on the LPS forum when I postulated that there are three different kinds of buyers: American, European (but mostly German) and Asian (but mostly Japanese.)
 
The speculation that was somewhat criticized for being too general and was, apparently, most supported is that those who gravitate to Japanese cars do so for reasons other than "the experience behind the wheel" often for reliability and durability (and ability to bypass service intervals without too many consequences.) Those who seem to embrace the German cars are wont to talk about their cornering capabilities and mostly aspects of the driving experience.
 
Japanese car buyers seem to (generally) want as much isolation as possible from sound and feel -- an observation that those who buy the Japanese brands often talk about how quiet and comfortable they are, rarely mentioning how a certain corner can be taken at triple the posted speed with aplomb and with a downshift at the apex and a full-throttle controlled exit (perhaps with a hint of throttle steering to boot.)
 
American car buyers often are quick to indicate a certain sense of Pride in the ownership of an American product -- and often are quite happy to discuss straight line acceleration. It is difficult to evoke much conversation about "driving" or the more visceral (other than straight line "git up and go!")characteristics of "the automobile" from American or Japanese owners.
 
These days, much of the American car talk is around the new holy grail: third row seating, and the refinement of many of the American SUV's and pickup trucks.
 
Sporting Sedan owners and shoppers seem keen to wax poetic about German driving 'sheens -- not so much the Japanese and American owners and shoppers.
 
None of these owner traits is wrong or bad, nor is one better than the other -- what is important is what will make you a satisfied, happy and enthusiastic owner. What will make YOU rebuy the "country of origin."
 
It is damn near impossible to get "unhooked" -- and this is due in large measure, I think, to the match of "your personality" and the "car's country of design, engineering and even build somewhat."
 
The Infiniti M35X impressed me MOST as the closest to the German "feel" and I almost bought one -- at the last minute, I went back to Audi and got an A6. After numerous Audis, three TT's in a row in fact, my wife shopped Japanese, American and German and pretty much had decided to go with an A4 3.2, until she drove an X3 3.0 with the sport package and the 6 speed manual.
 
It was all over then.
 
We had driven the 330xi, the G35X, the Acura TL, the Mercedes C AWD version, a Saab, a Cadillac SRX, a Jeep Grand with the HEMI and on and on and on.
 
The SRX with MagnaRide -- still even NOW -- believe it or not was a pretty close second for my wife, the lack of a stick shift probably threw it to the X3. The Mercedes complete abandonment of sticks, too, ruled them out.
 
Even the 330xi cannot be had with a proper sport package, including sport suspension, seats, tires and wheels -- and servotronic, natch.
 
The X3 was not derived as far as I can tell from a truck -- it has crisp 3 series handling -- can be "dolled up" with the sport, lux and electronic bits lux and near lux buyers have come to expect. It has a smooth as BUTTA engine that with the 6 speed is not underpowered (as it is when equipped with the 5 speed stutter-tronic -- although this will be remedied in MY 2007 with the 6 speed Steptronic and the high output (non turbo version) of the 3.0 with at least 255HP and better gas mileage.)
 
If you are in lust with the Toyota you will probably not "get the X3" -- if you are a German car - type personality (way over generalized, I know) you will wonder "where's the beef" with the Toyota.
 
Both types of personalities are good, acceptable, moral, decent, frugal and in their own way "fun" even. But, the differences are real.
 
You probably won't enjoy the German car if you cut your teeth on Japanese cars and if your "crowd" is mostly full of Japanese car drivers. And, vice versa.
 
If your peer group is totally mini-vans and pick-em-up trucks the X3 will seem flimsy and not very capable.
 
The X3 is an SAV -- not an off-road SUV by any stretch.
 
It can run with the sport sedan crowd within limits, and can at least hang with the SUV's without embarrassing itself.
 
It is, however, mostly a sport sedan with some utility and space -- but it is most exciting when equipped with the stick. Virtually no one else offers this combination today.
 
I submit, that there is no Toyota that even comes close.
 
Conversely, if your "attitude" is more in keeping with Toyota's values and attributes, there is probably no way you will be happy with any BMW.
 
Get what is "you" that is.
#2784 of 3287
Re: I won't repeat the post. . . [markcincinnati] by tidester HOST
Jul 28, 2006 (3:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Jul 28, 2006 11:05 am)

an observation that those who buy the Japanese brands often talk about how quiet and comfortable they are...
 
Conversely, if your "attitude" is more in keeping with Toyota's values and attributes...
 
In my experience, the Camry isn't exactly the quietest with respect to road noise nor even close to the most comfortable.
 
tidester, host
#2785 of 3287
Re: I won't repeat the post. . . [markcincinnati] by driver100
Jul 28, 2006 (4:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Jul 28, 2006 11:05 am)

Conversely, if your "attitude" is more in keeping with Toyota's values and attributes, there is probably no way you will be happy with any BMW.
 
I think you put things accurately in perspective.
 
I read a review of a Solara in the newspaper and I think it was a good review of Toyotas and most Japanese cars. The Solara is really a 2 door Camry, in 4 cylinder form it has beautiful finish, all the safety features and packs a lot of value for the price, around $25,000 U.S. It is totally anemic, no get up and go if you need it, say to move into traffic, and it is bland. Too bland to for the writer to consider and the 6 cylinder models are only slightly better. Even the writer acknowledges that these cars are as dependable as a car can be, but it is no joy to drive. And, I saw a similar review for the Lexus RX300. Competent but no enjoyment in driving...and no feel of the road or cornering ability.
 
And hey, that is all some people need or want.
 
Me, I am truly enjoying the ride and as far as repairs, I'll take my chances and see what happens. I think the risk is well worth it. I have driven quite a few rentals and tried out a few other cars and SUV's, but the X3 is truly a unique experience.
(If I run into repairs down the road I will have no regrets, I will have loved and lost and I will try again, though it will be something else if that happens).
#2786 of 3287
Re: I won't repeat the post. . . [markcincinnati] by bodble2
Jul 28, 2006 (5:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: markcincinnati (Jul 28, 2006 11:05 am)

"Conversely, if your "attitude" is more in keeping with Toyota's values and attributes, there is probably no way you will be happy with any BMW."
 
I don't know 'bout that. We have a TL and a Mini, and they drive and steer and ride completely different. But I honestly say I enjoy driving both. Sometimes I appreciate the power and isolation of the TL, but sometimes I like the somewhat unrefined visceral nature of the Mini.
 
I think it's like food. I enjoy fine dining in posh restaurants as much as anyone. But sometimes a good old backyard BBQ, almost literally eating right off the grill, can also be as good as it gets.
#2787 of 3287
Re: I won't repeat the post. . . but the true is the true...!!! by juanchypr
Jul 28, 2006 (6:37 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Jul 28, 2006 5:48 pm)

I won't repeat the post. . . but the true is the true...!!!
 
My last driving tests were, Volvo XC70 2006 by 10 days (07/06). Before this I’m through the experience to participate in "Driven to Find a Cure" (06/06) and one of test was X5 3.0, that I can easily use to compare with my X3 3.0 Steptronic.
Before my X3, it was a Toyota 1996 RAV4 2.0, 5 speed, All wheel drive, 3 doors, 2.5 Tons or less (1996-2004) 120,000 miles.
 
Also, between the last mentioned, I drove a PT Cruiser Turbo 2006, Camry 2006, Taurus 2006 foo sh_t, and Grand Am 2006. But, it have no value to make a comparison with thems.
   
I’m always preferred to compare performance on cars and not the best bumpers or the best interiors.
 
My RAV4 was and amazing small SUV, it was fast for its weight and motor size and after change to the 3rd gear of course; it was also good in handling, moving on curves and in highway, and the best a lot of fun to drive it.
But with a lack of pep and no roaring.
 
The X5 3.0 experiences it was like be in a big boat with very big waves coming from the front. It was to slow, I tried using also the steptronic and it was no change in performance like I quickly feel on my X3. Same combination of motor and transmission on my X3.
But with a lack of pep and no roaring.
 
The Volvo XC70, 5 Cylinders Turbo, Automatic – something like Steptronic. The performance of this was just remind me driving my RAV4.
Lack of pep and no roaring.
 
To eliminate the possibilities that I’m not fare when I compare the performance of my X3 with the previously mentioned. I use a judge, my wife. She is not a car lovers, but she have a very good sense to compare, and she agree with me. The X3 is not good in performance, is Xtremelly good in performance.
 
Also, she degraded the X3 performance, but it was went we test the 550, 650 coupe, and 650 convertible.
 
03/04 X33.0 Alpine White, Montana Grey, Steptronic
#2788 of 3287
Re: I won't repeat the post. . . but the true is the true...!!! [juanchypr] by bodble2
Jul 28, 2006 (11:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: juanchypr (Jul 28, 2006 6:37 pm)

Hmm...let me see if I can capsulize what you're trying to say. You like your X3! Was that it?
 
BTW, what's "roaring"?

Messages Page 279 of 329
1
...
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
...
329
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement