4185 messages,
Last post on Apr 15, 2013 at 1:30 PM
You are in the
BMW X3 & X5 Forum.
What is this discussion about?
BMW X3, SUV
#2637 of 4185 Re: Better pics [driver100]
by markcincinnati
May 29, 2006 (9:11 am)
Waiting in line at the pumps will only happen if there is a shortage of gas. Currently there is not a shortage.
Right after Katrina, in northern KY, Premium Gas from a brand name outlet was $3.40+.
No lines then, no lines now that the same station is at $2.86 for premium.
The rare rare lines represent a distribution problem not a supply problem.
My 2005 Audi A6 3.2 routinely goes 600 miles on a tankful (which equates to 30+MPG's.) I can only dream what my exact same car with the 3.0 TD engine would get (somewhere between 20 and 40% better according to published specs.)
Plus the performance from 0-60 improves and the price of diesel HERE at least is about the same a regular (and my Audi requires premium). The price for [a lot of] these German diesel cars on a European configurator is often less than the more or less equivalent gasoline version.
A 3.2 V6 gas Audi A6 costs 900 Euro's MORE than the 3.0 TD Audi A6.
Similar differences are able to be seen for BMW and Mercedes -- to name drop.
Your conclusion about mileage and savings of bbl of oil tracks with articles I have read in magazines such as Popular Mechanics (which I presume is known for at least attempting to report facts with accuracy.)
But the point is that while 1MPG would be impressive in what it could save, we could likely save 20% or more while improving acceleration and speed, reducing greenhouse emissions, lowering MSRP and lowering the actual cost per gallon -- all with the adoption of a mature and ever advancing technology: turbo diesels. In the case of my own experience I could, one would extrapolate, go from 30MPG (highway) to 36MPG, the price would drop and the impact "socially" (and economically) would be enormous.
Given our mutual assumption that we want to be responsible (assuming it does not inconvenience us), the immediate adoption of "equivalent" turbo diesel engines in our cars is darn near like having our cake and eating it too.
The problem is you can't go into your Buick dealer and order the gas engine at 3.6L (or whatever) OR the 3.5LTDI engine -- GM (in this example) has just not gotten around to producing the engine and marrying the engine to the car.
Audi, BMW and Mercedes (out of "necessity" -- higher gas prices for a lot longer) produce gas engined cars and identical cars with virtually identical diesel engines.
The diesel engines provide the customer a choice that usually includes, lower acquisition cost up front, lower fueling costs ongoing, a longer lasting powerplant and both better acceleration and miles per gallon.
Given the availability of such a choice, one would assume that Adam Smith, not social responsibility would make these vehicles popular with the car buying public.
Yet, I just read that the new Saturn SUV will be bigger, heavier and thirstier than any ever produced by Saturn and that they expect "brisk" demand.
On the other hand, lots of folks in Germany seem to smoke (it feels and smells like more than we do on this side of the Atlantic.)
I certainly hope if BMW offers a nifty new X3 with a potent diesel that I won't have to start smoking.
#2638 of 4185 Re: Better pics [markcincinnati]
by driver100
May 29, 2006 (12:08 pm)
Canadians buy more smaller and economical cars, however, gas prices can have an affect on what we purchase;
"Sales of the biggest SUVs tumbled as hurricanes Katrina and Rita and fears of gas shortages sent fuel prices soaring to well above $1 a litre across most of Canada and $3 (U.S.) a gallon south of the border...The slide hit large SUVs in particular. Sales in that category, which includes such behemoths as Dodge Durango, Ford Expedition, GMC Yukon and Nissan Armada, slumped 50 per cent last month in Canada from year-earlier levels, according to data released by the auto makers yesterday...The percentage declines in sales of large SUVs were similar in the U.S. market, where they represent a much larger and more important slice of the overall market than they do in Canada."
IMO high gas prices and thinking of our oil supply with some respect is having an affect on a small portion of the population...there are even people willing to pay an extra $5,000 for hybrids!
Of course there are others who will drive whatever they want to drive and high gas prices or trying to preserve the gas supply is of little concern.
IMO I think we are more aware of the price and supply of gasoline than we have been since Katrina, growing demand for oil in China, unfriendly countries unwilling to sell us oil.
Diesel engines with turbos sounds like an exciting proposition. Probably more promising than the dubious benefits of batteries.
You are right, people in Europe are still smoking in much greater numbers than we do and even there it is starting to become a less sociable thing to do (new rules in England to make smoke free restaurants at last).
IMO there is more awareness about the cost and supply of oil, and I am sure some people smile when they see the guy filling up his Hummer (not to be judgemental).
#2639 of 4185 Concerns about the fuel economy of the X3
by mpereira123
May 29, 2006 (3:44 pm)
Hi -
I'm considering purchasing an X3, but I'm wary of the range of MPG estimates I've seen for the car (from 16-24). IMO, 24 is ok, but anything below 20 is really not acceptable. What type of mileage do you guys typically get on your X3s? I'm going to be using it in a fair amount of rush-hour traffic (driving near downtown Cincinnati). Also, how far can you go on one tank? Can you really put middle-grade gas in it? (This is what the dealer told me...)
Matt
#2640 of 4185 Re: Concerns about the fuel economy of the X3 [mpereira123]
by driver100
May 29, 2006 (4:36 pm)
I will try to answer as best I can;
*once you hit 10,000 miles mileage increases 20%. Someone said it here and I thought it sounded weird, but it was true. At 15,000 miles I get 18 to 24 MPG U.S. Around 20 to 22 in mixed driving.
*If I really stretch it to the limit I can go about 400 miles on a tankful, I haven't gone beyond that but that was close to empty.
*From what I have read you can use medium grade if the engine doesn't knock. But, there is probably no real savings as the engine won't run as efficiently, and you could do some damage. Sensors will adjust it to run on lower grade fuel, but the savings will be small or non existant.
*If great gas mileage is critical to your decision I would go with something else, maybe more mileage in a 3 series station wagon. I have heard a VW GTI diesel gets 65 MPG.
If you need an SUV type vehicle, and love the X3, and you can live with pretty good gas mileage considering it's size, weight, performance then the X3 is a great ride. However, if you think you will be disappointed I would really go with something else because 24 MPG is under pretty ideal conditions.
Hope that helps!
#2641 of 4185 Momma Continued.........
by bargamon
May 29, 2006 (8:47 pm)
Looking at an Avalon now.
Trucks/Crossovers do ride different than cars.
Momma ain't skiing! Thats for darn sure. Thanks for the advice.
I told her to either get a wagon (car) or just get another sedan. She is set in her mind in many ways. Just ain't gonna bend her.
This is a second car. Her 1998 pristine S500 has spoiled her rotton. The "Bismark" just floats along. Double insulated glass and heavy as a brinks truck the ride is very smooth on that Sedan.
On the Hummer. Outside of military use they are becoming joke.
Just cuz gas is cheap does not mean we have to be pigs about it. And as a tool we are beholden to opec when we are so wasteful.
#2642 of 4185 Re: Concerns about the fuel economy of the X3 [driver100]
by markcincinnati
May 30, 2006 (5:52 am)
Background
I am willing to bet you want an X3 sans manual transmission.
We live in Cincinnati, too.
The X3 3.0 with the current 5speed auto spends a lot of time hunting for the right gear here in the city of "7 hills." The mileage and performance of the auto version is lower than the stick shift version.
This is both a realatively thirsty and dirty engine. It is, also, a very sweet engine to have underfoot.
The 255HP 3.0 and the 6speed (and perhaps a hoped for 7 speed) automatic will improve every aspect of this car's power train -- especially if you are like the 99% who want automatics.
To make the point: here in the city of 7 hills the 5 speed auto version is thirsty (below 20 around town easily) and somewhat unstatisfying if you like a car that feels nimble when you press on the accelerator.
Our test drive experience was that every little press on the accelerator caused a downshift followed a few seconds later by an upshift followed by a down shift and so on.
It needs a 6 speed transmission if you want the auto version. It is also peppier and more controllable with the stick shift, but I know I am more than likely speaking to an unreceptive audience.
The upcoming X3 will have the new engine, the 6speed auto and a refreshed interior and one is led to believe an even more compliant ride tuning.
This is a thirsty little dude.
On the highway, it can and does, however, exceed 24.
#2643 of 4185 Re: Concerns about the fuel economy of the X3 [markcincinnati]
by mpereira123
May 30, 2006 (7:51 am)
Hi Mark!
Thanks for the insight!
So what is the best mileage you've ever gotten on it? (How far above 24)?
Matt
#2644 of 4185 Re: Concerns about the fuel economy of the X3 [mpereira123]
by markcincinnati
May 30, 2006 (9:06 am)
25-ish on the stretch of I-70 between Columbus Oh and Pittsburgh, Pa.
All of what I have said must also be said to include:
"we love our X3."
We test drove the 3.0 and the 2.5 with the automatic over a period of days. They had ONE 3.0 6speed manual and we tried the back to back to back thing too -- theses were two different cars. Now, perhaps, had we used the step mode of the steptronic we would have come away with a different opinion. My wife will NOT use the manumatic in manu mode, plain and simple.
This was a disappointment (to me) to think this great little SAV (little, being not an exactly correct sentiment) was brought to market with such a lame transmission (and the thing seems to sell well despite the fact.)
This is a great car with the stick, tho!
#2645 of 4185 Re: Momma Continued......... [bargamon]
by driver100
May 30, 2006 (9:14 am)
This is a second car. Her 1998 pristine S500 has spoiled her rotton. The "Bismark" just floats along. Double insulated glass and heavy as a brinks truck the ride is very smooth on that Sedan.
Please keep us posted on each car she tries out. It would be fun to know her impressions. If going the Avalon route, Lexus, Honda, Infinity or Accura might be worth a try.
#2646 of 4185 Re: Momma Continued......... [driver100]
by bargamon
May 30, 2006 (11:05 am)
Be more fun to take a video camera around and do a "virtual" show. Mom is a hoot and very set in her ways!
She harkens back to the 1950's when "daddy" had an imperial or the best of buicks and Olds. Was "too showy" back then for a Caddy!
The thought the RX330 was gonna be great because it was a "lexus"! She is a pure thru and thru with no shame a true "nameplate slut"!
I am wondering if a ride in an X3 for grins and giggles migh do. Why? "BMW"! Current 2nd car is a 1993 Volvo v70 turbo sport wagon which she claims drives "like a truck"!
She hated the Honda pilot, Tribeca, infiiti FX and forsome reason they (with dad) drove an Audi A4 wagon which they never got off the lot. Duh!