Sign In Join 



BMW 1-Series

1809 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 4:49 PM

You are in the BMW 1-Series Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? BMW 1 Series, Coupe, Convertible, Sedan


Messages Page 168 of 182
1
...
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
...
182
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1664 of 1809
Re: Having second thoughts about the 135i [bodble2] by tagman
Sep 10, 2008 (9:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bodble2 (Sep 10, 2008 8:43 pm)

You must be just messing with me. Are you telling me that there's nothing special about cars? That they are barely more than the Maytag appliance you referred to earlier?
 
Blasphemy!
 
TM
#1665 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [tagman] by fedlawman
Sep 10, 2008 (9:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Sep 10, 2008 7:17 pm)

An additional +/-100 lbs sitting over the front axle is more than "a hill of beans." Plus the bigger brakes and bigger wheels add unsprung weight, which pound for pound, has more influence over handling and braking than body mass.
 
Again, I haven't driven them so I'm only talking theory, but I believe that the lighter nose and unstaggered front/rear wheels must give the 128i crisper turn-in, less understeer, and more responsive steering. I'm not saying it's a dramatic difference (far from it - most people probably wouldn't notice), but I do believe the difference is there.
#1666 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [fedlawman] by tagman
Sep 10, 2008 (10:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Sep 10, 2008 9:43 pm)

I'm not saying it's a dramatic difference (far from it - most people probably wouldn't notice), but I do believe the difference is there.
 
That's because the difference IS there, and you are right that it is not a dramatic difference, and most people wouldn't notice. But, if we are here taking notice of the smallest differences, then surely we should also take notice of the eye-popping differences... the ones that most people WOULD notice.
 
So, we've identified one such small difference in the weight of the two vehicles. The increase in weight for the 135i is all of 3.5%.
 
But, consider that the 135i has an eye-popping 30% increase in horsepower!
It also has a massive 50% increase in torque! The 135i's front brakes are 12.75% larger in diameter!... And even larger in terms of their corresponding surface area. You referred earlier to the 0-60 times. If we visit those numbers we would discover that the 135i is 25% faster getting to 60mph! Now, those are all some significant numbers, and I'd say they make for some profound differences.
 
So... I think it's safe to say that it's going to be those very large profound differences that ultimately are sure to be the ones noticed the most when driving the two cars as a comparison.
 
TM
#1667 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [cdnpinhead] by circlew
Sep 11, 2008 (3:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: cdnpinhead (Sep 10, 2008 6:36 pm)

Does the 1-series come with the abominable run-flat tires?

But, of course!
 
Regards,
OW
#1668 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [fedlawman] by circlew
Sep 11, 2008 (3:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Sep 10, 2008 9:43 pm)

When it comes to cars, I respect your knowledge and capabilities. You are one of the best teachers for me over the last 3 years. Please drive these 2 and let us know what you think.
 
In my non-professional opinion, the added cost for the power and brakes alone make the 135i a screaming bargain for someone like you who WOULD track the car at least 6 - 10 times per year but only you could make that personal choice and probably could get as much from the 128 on the track as well. Coming out of the turns without TC/DSC would give the 135i and edge that IMHO is undeniable.
 
I tend to purchase as TM does...give me the added performance up front.
 
Regards,
OW
#1669 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [tagman] by fedlawman
Sep 11, 2008 (7:26 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Sep 10, 2008 10:47 pm)

I mostly agree with you.
 
"The increase in weight for the 135i is all of 3.5%."
 
Using a percentage here gives the illusion of an insignificant difference. I still say 120 lbs is 120 lbs - mostly right over the front axle. Of course, you're talking to someone who removed the air conditioning from his M3 to shave 30 lbs off the nose .
 
As for power, I'm with you. The difference is dramatic and intoxicating. The 128i is quick - the 135i is a rocket.
 
On the street, who cares about another 1" diameter on the rotors? You'll never fade either system.
 
Another minus (in my book) for the 135i is the twin-turbo engine itself. If I were a leasing/short-term ownership kind of guy, I wouldn't hesitate to choose the 135i. But if I was looking for a long-term relationship with a 1-series, I wouldn't touch the hot running, no dipstick TT with a ten foot pole.
 
Don't take it personally Tag. The 135i is a car that I could easily own and I'm jealous that you have one. If I were in the market for a car right now, it would be on my very short list (again, I wouldn't choose the 128i either - simply because of the power deficit).
#1670 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [circlew] by fedlawman
Sep 11, 2008 (7:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 11, 2008 3:56 am)

I don't know if I deserve the compliment, but thanks. Yes, I do want to drive them.
 
I agree the 135i is the better bargain. If I owned a 135i though, I wouldn't track it (OK, maybe just once to see). It's too heavy and luxurious to subject to that abuse. No, I'd probably leave it mostly stock and enjoy it's combination of sport and comfort on the street.
#1671 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [fedlawman] by qbrozen
Sep 11, 2008 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Sep 11, 2008 7:32 am)

It's too heavy and luxurious to subject to that abuse.
 
LOL!
 
I'm not laughing at you ... kinda laughing at myself. I track my 3750lb G35X.
#1672 of 1809
Re: Having second thoughts about the 135i [tagman] by bodble2
Sep 11, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: tagman (Sep 10, 2008 9:26 pm)

People have a special relationship with cars because (for most people) they perceive their cars to be an extension of their personality, accurately or not. Also, because cars are constantly on public display, people view them as a vehicle (pardon the pun!) for personal advertisement for whatever qualities they want to project (real or imagined), be it wealth, sexiness, machismo, coolness, etc. And of course, the high cost of a car is also a factor in creating this "passionate" relationship. I would hypothecate that if your refrigerator costs $40K and you can customize it with personal options and lug it around in public, you may also develop a "passionate relationship" with it too!
 
Now the question is why is it mostly men that bond with their cars. I guess it's the machismo ingrained into the male psyche by years of propaganda advertising. And I guess clothes and shoes to women are what cars are to men.
 
As for the question, am I messing with you? Yeah, maybe, since I'm part of that herd that has an inexplicable bonding with cars. But when you cut out all the rhetoric and analyze the nuts and bolts (again, pardon the pun), that is what it is.
#1673 of 1809
Re: My $.02 [fedlawman] by tagman
Sep 11, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: fedlawman (Sep 11, 2008 7:26 am)

you're talking to someone who removed the air conditioning from his M3 to shave 30 lbs off the nose
 
That says it all. I understand.
 
I had a Lotus Elise two years ago, and I can genuinely appreciate the whole idea of "less is more".
 
TM

Messages Page 168 of 182
1
...
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
...
182
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement