Sign In Join 



Mazda3 Hatchback

2744 messages,  Last post on Nov 17, 2008 at 9:48 AM

You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer

What is this discussion about? Mazda MAZDA3, Coupe, Hatchback, Sedan


Messages Page 269 of 275
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
275
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2680 of 2744
Re: Looking for some input on the 3 [roadburner] by bottgers
Sep 28, 2007 (6:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: roadburner (Sep 28, 2007 5:46 am)

As the price of gas goes up (and it will continue to do so), that number gets bigger. I'm not saying cars that put a smile on your face should go away. I'm saying auto makers should be more focussed on building more fuel efficient vehicles than they currently appear to be.
#2681 of 2744
Re: Looking for some input on the 3 [roadburner] by autonomous
Sep 28, 2007 (9:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: roadburner (Sep 28, 2007 5:46 am)

Look, I've done the math; if I drive 15,000 miles per year and average 22 mpg I'll use 682 gallons of gas. At $3.50 per gallon that works out to $2387 ... a fuel sipper that will average 35 mpg. In 15,000 miles I will have used 429 gallons, which at $3.50 per gallon would amount to $1500- a savings of $887.
 
Remember that the Mazdaspeed3 uses premium fuel and the Mazda3 uses regular; the fuel savings would be around $1000 per year.
 
Since most drivers keep their cars for more than one year, one should also calculate the difference over a longer period (like 3 or 5 years). So, that would mean the Mazdaspeed3 is now $3000 to $5000 more than the Mazda3.
 
Also, one should also factor in the additional maintenance required for the turbo speed.
 
But, as you say, to each his own. The Mazdaspeed3 is an impressive machine.
#2682 of 2744
Re: Looking for some input on the 3 [autonomous] by iz24too
Sep 30, 2007 (7:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: autonomous (Sep 28, 2007 9:36 am)

#2683 of 2744
Ground clearance change by iz24too
Sep 30, 2007 (7:23 am)
Reply
I notice that the 06 and older models ground clearance is a little higher -5.90 vs. 4.8 on newer models, 4.8 does seems low to me since we have snow/slush 5 months out of the year just wondering your take!?
#2684 of 2744
Re: Air Dam Option [jazzmin] by igozoomzoom
Oct 06, 2007 (1:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: jazzmin (Sep 26, 2007 1:38 pm)

Quick suggestion, before you order one (if the dealer will even do that)- use the inventory search tool on Mazda's website. It requires a zip code and will search up to a 150 mile radius from it. If you want to expand your search beyond 150 miles, look up a zip code that is roughly 200 miles away or so. Of course, you'll have to travel to wherever you locate it to buy it but it might be worth it.
 
That's exactly what I did back in 12/05 when I was looking for my MZ3 5-door. I'm in Atlanta, but the closest ones I could find in Titanium Gray with manual transmission were in Knoxville TN and Charlotte NC. I ended up getting almost $2k off sticker from the dealer in Knoxville and it was well worth the three hour trip to get exactly what I wanted and not wait for it.
 
Your chances of getting much of a discount on an ordered car are pretty low, too. Buying one on the lot will always be a better deal as long as it's what you want.
#2685 of 2744
Re: Looking for some input on the 3 [bottgers] by gib11
Oct 08, 2007 (6:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: bottgers (Sep 28, 2007 3:59 am)

Not sure. Some people will be fine with plain vanilla ice cream, others will want a little more like chocolate coating, more expensive but much better, By the way Mazda rose its sale almost 30% in 2007 in the US selling almost 100k MZ3, not bad for a 4 year old style. Thats double the sale since 2004. The MZ3 has bigger motor (more HP and torque), bigger tires, and heavier cars, and still manage to be more fuel efficient than the elentra, focus, VW rabbit, jetta, Astra, caliber, optra, kia rio, rondo, sentra, cobalt (170hp, and even thge Honda fit (cruising at 70mph). IMO, the MZ3 is still a very fuel efficient car for what you get.
#2686 of 2744
Re: I thought I'd get.... [bottgers] by socal2006
Oct 08, 2007 (5:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bottgers (Sep 23, 2007 3:45 am)

The reason why you probably didnt get many responses is because this topic has been covered quite a bit on these forums (you have to do some digging).
 
In any case, there's a topic about people's real world fuel economy and one also about the differences between the 2.0 and 2.3 engines.
 
Briefly, the 2.0 is fairly fuel efficient and looking at Consumer Report's numbers it's not that far off from the Civic in real world use. The 2.3 will not net you tons more power but it is noticeable. For me, the biggest difference is in the smoothness of the 2.3 engine. It often feels more like a v6 than a buzzy i4.
 
As for whether Mazda is behind Toyota and/or Honda in engine tech, it probably is considering the relative size of the R&D departments (even taking into consideration being partnered with Ford). Still, Mazda really is not dramatically behind. You have to remember that Mazda tends to design their engines with a flatter torque curve; their gearing is more aggressive as well. Some people find driving Honda i4 to be frustrating as they need more revs (in general) to achieve the same power. Thus, there are tradeoffs for the increased fuel economy observed in say a Civic vs. a Mazda3.
 
If what you really care about is fuel economy, then a Mazda is probably not the way to go. I would venture you should look at a hybrid if you are saving the world or a Civic (maybe even a B class vehicle) if you are saving money.
#2687 of 2744
Road Racing 3s Hatchback by outingsinc
Oct 11, 2007 (8:15 am)
Reply
I am going to be road racing my 3s hatchback this coming summer and I'm wondering if anyone else is currently racing one? If so has anyone run into problems installing a SCCA approved rollcage such as driver seat movement, visability and if you can still use the rear seat or is that lost?
 
Any help or information would be greatly appreciated as the purchase and installation is forth coming this winter.
 
Thanks
#2688 of 2744
Re: Road Racing 3s Hatchback [outingsinc] by roadburner
Oct 11, 2007 (7:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: outingsinc (Oct 11, 2007 8:15 am)

If so has anyone run into problems installing a SCCA approved rollcage such as driver seat movement, visability and if you can still use the rear seat or is that lost?
 
I don't know about the 3 in particular, but installing a roll cage almost always compromises or eliminates rear seat accomodations. You also must remember that even a padded cage can present a danger to a passenger who isn't wearing a helmet. You might need to check some boards that are more competition oriented.
#2689 of 2744
Rear quarter windows by gordonwd
Nov 10, 2007 (7:44 pm)
Reply
Dumb question maybe, but do the small triangular rear "quarter windows" in the 5-door hatch open? I forgot to check this when we test-drove one today.

Messages Page 269 of 275
1
...
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
...
275
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement