You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 Hatchback

2744 messages, Last post on Nov 17, 2008 at 9:48 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
I would love a 110 hp Mazda3 - I would buy one tomorrow if they had it in the hatchback. With a stick shift it would probably be about as fast as the current 2.0 automatic, and would get near hybrid mpg. The 1.5 liter Protege only had 92 hp. I used to have a 76 hp VW Scirocco. It was plenty fast - how much over 100 mph do you really need to go? 52 hp in a VW bus is slow (the only vehicle CR rated not acceptable because of speed). 110hp in a small economy car is not even close to slow. Mazda RX-7 had 105 hp when it came out. The original VW GTI had about the same. Those were two of the most fun to drive cars ever made. I know cars weigh more now so sure a litte more hp is fine, but when people start saying you need to have 200 hp to get out of your own way that is just misinformed. Too many people just focus on the hp number which does not mean much by itself. Kinda like saying an offensive lineman is faster than a wide reciever because he has stronger legs (superbowl is coming up - forgive me). Ironically as much as people are overconcerned about power they seem to forget that adding an automatic saps so much of that power. Consumer Reports got the 2.0 Mazda3 at 8.6 seconds to 60 mph nearly 2 seconds faster than the automatic. How come nobody says why buy an automatic because it would be the "slowest vehicle ever sold"? I guess as long as we can buy oil oversees we can keep turning up the power. off soapbox
|
|
|
Replying to: dudleyr (Jan 29, 2007 6:27 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dudleyr (Jan 29, 2007 6:27 pm) Power and low weight = the good fun. The Mazda3 with the 2.3 is fun but it's not a grin-inducing blast. Add the turbo and it gets more entertaining but then you have the inherent limits of FWD. 200+ with a sub 3000 lbs car is fun. 300 with a sub 3000 lbs car and RWD = heaven. How come nobody says why buy an automatic because it would be the "slowest vehicle ever sold"? Autos mated to 4s tend to sap power much more so than current 6 speed autos in 6 and 8 cylinder cars. That said, I'll take a manual anyday over a slushie. |
|
|
Can anybody that has a 3 with traction control tell me if it can be turned off? Thanks.
|
|
|
Replying to: dudleyr (Feb 14, 2007 8:58 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dudleyr (Feb 14, 2007 8:58 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: claudius753 (Feb 14, 2007 4:58 pm) |
|
|
Hi all, I am planning a car pretty soon and I do not have much time to go to dearlers and try cars. I like the Mazda 3 hatchback line a lot. Do you guys think that it would be roomy enough for a 6 feet person like me? Thanks in advance, Fran
|
|
|
Replying to: franbo (Feb 15, 2007 3:52 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: franbo (Feb 15, 2007 3:52 pm) I'm 6'0" and I fit fine, though I adjust the seat height all of the way down. I also have the moonroof which takes away about an inch of head room. When I first got the car the seat was adjusted up some and I was really close to the roof. I also started getting pains in my legs and back. Finally, I realized that I could adjust the seat height and lumbar, and now it is the most comfortable car I have eve had. One heads up though, if you plan on anyone to be able to sit behind you, forget about it. At my comfortable adjustment, the seat is nearly the whole way back, and there is maybe 4 inches between the back of my seat and the end of the rear seat. If you drive alone or with one other person you would be fine, even 2 passengers would be fine if they sat behind the passenger seat. My hope for the next ('09) Mz3 is to have the rear seats able to be adjusted back like in the '06 CR-V and Chevy Equinox. The rear seats could go back at least 4 inches or so in the Mz3, with less cargo space, or adjust them forward when you need the space... |
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Mazda3
Mazda3 Hatchback
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats