Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazda3 Hatchback
2744 messages, Last post on Nov 17, 2008 at 9:48 AM
You are in the Mazda3 Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: snowpea (Dec 08, 2006 7:07 am) As far as the models go, test-drive both models extensively, to see which model suits you better. I can tell you from experience that Traction Control does help in the winter weather, but since your '02 RSX-S doesn't have it, you may think it isn't necessary, which is fine. Whether or not it's a '06 or '07, buy the car that you like better, and don't skip out on options or colors you want just to get the warranty for '06.
|
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Dec 08, 2006 10:04 am) I did some research into my Acura and yup no traction control, which means I probably won't miss it, but that's not to say it won't be nice to have, since I do notice in a big winter storm, it's always nerve wracking to be sitting at a light not knowing if the acura is going to move when the light turns, or perhaps I just need some better tires. On the other hand, I might not really have a choice since the chance of finding an '06 in the color and trim i want right now might be next to nil. So I'm still torn, but now it's more about whether I should be buying the '07 mazda3 at all or stick with my Acura. The reason I'm looking for a new car is not because I don't like my Acura but rather I am starting to get sick of commuting in Boston traffic with a manual transmission after 5 years. The '07 Mazda3 GT hatch has nearly everything I want if I were to get a new car (hatchback, heated seats, auto, sweet looking inside out, in my price range...), but my Acura has been extremely reliable for the past 5 years, I did not have to fix a thing other than recently changing two brakes and the tires. I am just worried that I might regret it if the Mazda3 is not as reliable, the fact that they shortened the warranty makes me a little more worried. Maybe someone can help me understand the warranty better? Is the drive train warranty being extended a big plus to offset the shortened "bumper to bumper" warranty? My understanding of "bumper to bumper" means anything/everything is wrong, it's covered, whereis the drive train covers the big important stuff that are less likely to break but more expensive to fix. Or am I completely off on what it means? Thanks again, Amy |
|
So what kind of gas mileage does the scooter get?
|
|
|
Replying to: mz6greyghost (Dec 08, 2006 10:04 am) I did some research into my Acura and yup no traction control, which means I probably won't miss it, but that's not to say it won't be nice to have, since I do notice in a big winter storm, it's always nerve wracking to be sitting at a light not knowing if the acura is going to move when the light turns, or perhaps I just need some better tires. On the other hand, I might not really have a choice since the chance of finding an '06 in the color and trim i want right now might be next to nil. So I'm still torn, but now it's more about whether I should be buying the '07 mazda3 at all or stick with my Acura. The reason I'm looking for a new car is not because I don't like my Acura but rather I am starting to get sick of commuting in Boston traffic with a manual transmission after 5 years. The '07 Mazda3 GT hatch has nearly everything I want if I were to get a new car (hatchback, heated seats, auto, sweet looking inside out, in my price range...), but my Acura has been extremely reliable for the past 5 years, I did not have to fix a thing other than recently changing two brakes and the tires. I am just worried that I might regret it if the Mazda3 is not as reliable, the fact that they shortened the warranty makes me a little more worried. Maybe someone can help me understand the warranty better? Is the drive train warranty being extended a big plus to offset the shortened "bumper to bumper" warranty? My understanding of "bumper to bumper" means anything/everything is wrong, it's covered, whereis the drive train covers the big important stuff that are less likely to break but more expensive to fix. Or am I completely off on what it means? Thanks again, Amy
|
|
|
Replying to: snowpea (Dec 08, 2006 11:44 am) I'm guessing that the different term warranty wasn't accomplishing what they wanted in terms of differentiating themselves from the competition.. I personally prefer the 4yr/50K warranty, but I haven't done a cost/benefit analysis to determine which is better.  I would concentrate on the value of the deals between the two cars.... everything else is probably about equal.. regards, kyfdx (not the host here) |
|
|
Be careful Mazda does not always honor the warranty. "My understanding of "bumper to bumper" means anything/everything is wrong, it's covered" This may be true with some car companies but not with Mazda - The question is WHO gets to decide what "wrong" means - |
|
|
Hi everyone, thanks for all the feedback! I went to the dealership in Wellesley MA this weekend and looked at the mazda 3 hatch back. They didn't have the GT but they had two Touring in the lot. So they threw in the leather heated seat, remote engine starter and the security system for free. Though instead of the factory black leather seats, I opted for the red custom leather seats, which they gave me for the price of the factory seats ($590 instead of $1195). I'm going to miss my Acura, but I'm very excited about the 3! |
|
|
Replying to: dudleyr (Dec 08, 2006 11:31 am) Meade |
|
|
I think one of our recent posters is disgruntled with his Mazda and is speaking unfairly about Mazda's warranty policies. There is a small booklet that comes in the owner's manual package that speaks to the whole warranty policy. Basically, "bumper to bumper" coverage includes everything, yes ... however, there are some items that are considered "wear" items that are not covered. These items include things like brake pads and rotors, clutches (in the case of a manual transmission), drive belts, etc. There also is a small list of other items (i.e. the radio, I believe) that have their own warranties. I think the warranty on the radio is one year, IIRC. There are also separate warranties on rust perforation and emissions equipment. I'm sure any dealer will go over the warranty coverage with you ... and if you ever do have a problem with a dealer not honoring the manufacturer's warranty, you can always take them to court for violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Similar to the Lemon Law in that it exists to protect the consumer, it ensures manufacturers stand behind their product's warranty as written. Meade |
|
|
If Mazda ignored (or even flat out refused to fix) a small problem (like a rattle in the dash) while the car was still under warranty I could accept it - after all no car is perfect. But let me focus in on one of the problems that Mazda will not fix - not the AC - but the engine stalling defect. Its clear more than a few Mazda3's have this serious defect - it started back in the 2004 model year - continued into 2005 & 2006 (not sure about 2007) and so far MAZDA HAS NOT FIXED ANY OF THE DEFECTIVE CARS. So here we have a SERIOUS DEFECT - that has been around for 3 YEARS - Mazda has done NOTHING. Can anyone say this is standing behind your product? Honoring the warranty? IMO Mazda should fix the cars with this problem. If they can't fix them they should give the customer their money back - or replace the whole car. Right?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks Mazda3 Mazda3 Hatchback
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA3
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
