Sign In Join 



Dodge Magnum

1877 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 3:55 PM

You are in the Dodge Magnum Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Dodge Magnum, Dodge Magnum SRT-8, Wagon


Messages Page 2 of 188
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
188
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11 of 1877
by ottowrkr
Feb 18, 2003 (1:58 pm)
Reply
They built the srt-4 (neon) and srt-10 (Ram pick-up) , why wouldnt they build the srt-8.
#12 of 1877
300N by chryslerguy
Mar 22, 2003 (10:36 pm)
Reply
Has anyone seen pictures of the next 300N, not the 300 LX or "New Yorker" If that is what it will be called?
#13 of 1877
Chrysler is improving by algie_fawkes
Mar 26, 2003 (11:32 am)
Reply
Please...in the face of recent news, please don't say that Chrysler is any less reliable than Mercedes. Yes, I am perfectly sane. CR rated Chrysler equal to BMW and ABOVE Mercedes in reliability this year. And from reliable sources I have heard that dealers are complaining that they aren't getting enough warranty work. Face it--Chrysler is doing better. They even got a quality control guy from Toyota, the industry leader in reliability. Why did he leave Toyota? Because he wanted to work for a company that did exciting things...and that's what we will expect from Chrysler.
 
by the way, you can go to the Allpar forums at www.allpar.com, where I am known as "eaglecars." They have a news & rumors forum that's pretty active.
#14 of 1877
LX-body Chrysler pic by a_l_hubcaps
Mar 26, 2003 (2:13 pm)
Reply
http://www.car-truck.com now has a [rather poor] undisguised pic of a Chrysler LX-body sedan. It looks pretty good, in my opinion, though it's a very radical departure from the Concorde and 300M. I'll be interested to see some more pics when the official ones come out.
 
-Andrew L
#15 of 1877
LX Pic by kosh_2258
Mar 26, 2003 (5:42 pm)
Reply
Obviously targeted at a different market than the current car. Thanks, but no thanks - I'm not into "bricks" with wheels. Time to start the hunt for a new brand of vehicle.
#16 of 1877
by algie_fawkes
Mar 28, 2003 (4:36 am)
Reply
I have to agree. I love the new brick car for what it is, but I would want a sleeker, cab-forward car for myself. At least something that is an evolution of the 300M. But, don't gripe yet...there are more designs on the way. anyhow, the April autoshow should have some new stuff for us to see.
#17 of 1877
CR reports by qualityguy
Mar 28, 2003 (10:23 am)
Reply
So what? I believe they have rated Hyundai and Honda the same also...
#18 of 1877
The notion doesn't bother me, just the execution by kosh_2258
Mar 28, 2003 (1:04 pm)
Reply
I know what Chrysler is trying to do, I just think they went way too far with it.
 
They are trying to recapture the unique American look in a contempory car but they've overshot the mark. Their glass ratio is too low. The Magnum has potential but needs to be smoothed out and slimmed up some. They need to shoot for the mid 60's proportions, not the mid-late 50's they pursued.
#19 of 1877
Don't rush to judgment by indydriver
Mar 28, 2003 (5:58 pm)
Reply
You haven't even seen the vehicles yet. The Magnum will definitely get "smoothed out" just like all concepts do on their way to production. The last issue of C&D has a great article on the Crossfire's evolution from concept to production. Even though the theme of the article was how little it changed, it still changed a lot. The Magnum will be fantastic. No one has seen enough of the new 300 to tell anything.
#20 of 1877
Seen the Magnum, seen the Airflite by kosh_2258
Mar 29, 2003 (6:19 am)
Reply
The direction is obvious.
 
Yes, I read the Magnum is something like 89% of what the production vehicle will look like. The C&D article on it was less than convincing stating that clinic participants described it as "tanklike".
I also know that in recent years Chrysler production cars vary little from their "concepts" too.
The production Crossfire is different from the concept to be sure, but then again it's nothing more than an MB CLK in Chrysler clothes. It's rear end styling has already been compared to a 60's AMC Marlin.
 
There are some things that simply will not change because of structural considerations and production lead times, the glass ratio is one of them. The doors ARE going to be tall and the glass short.
 
As for seeing the LX or not seeing the LX that's not relevant. I know what I've seen so far, I know what I like and what I don't like.
 
I don't care for the direction DC is taking with the LX based on the samples revealed so far. I've also explained why I don't. Will my opinion change anything? Nope, and I don't expect it will. But I will express it none the less. If you agree OK. If you disagree that's your privilege too.
 
The ultimate decision will be in the market place regardless of anyones opinion.

Messages Page 2 of 188
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
188
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement