Sign In Join 



Chevrolet Equinox

2239 messages,  Last post on Nov 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM

You are in the Chevrolet Equinox Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Equinox, SUV


Messages Page 210 of 225
1
...
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
...
225
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#2084 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [jim_dandy] by nvbanker
May 03, 2008 (1:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jim_dandy (May 01, 2008 4:41 pm)

I agree completely with your assessment of the Kia. They aren't really close to either the Escape or the Equinoxious.
 
I have purchased both for customers - Personally, I prefer the Escape of the 3. It's a Japanese design (Mazda), built in Michigan, the Equinox is a GM design, built in Mexico. The Kia is Korean, not that there's anything wrong with that - but it's built in Korea and VietNam. If you get the VietNam edition, they tend to have problems. I rented a Sportage and put 800 miles on it in Costa Rica in a week. It performed flawlessly, but was less fun and less comfy than either the Escape or the Equinox.
 
Beyond all that though, the Equinox is very nice driving and designed very well in the interior. The Escape is a tad more solid to me, and would be my first choice, either in the Escape, Mazda Tribute or Mercury Mariner version. 3 flavors, if you will, of the same candy. YMMV, but that's how I feel, having experience with all 3.
#2085 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by commuter10
May 05, 2008 (5:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm)

I love my Equinox too. A small point. The Equinox is made in Canada at a joint GM-Suzuki plan with an engine made at a joint GM Shanghai motors plant with a Japanese Aisan transmission.
 
I have 22,000 miles on my 2006 and it has performed well so far.
#2086 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by gmanyday
May 08, 2008 (6:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm)

hey there! Just to let you know the equinox is indeed a G.M design,however it is built in Ontario Canada not in Mexico.
#2087 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by camiguy
May 09, 2008 (10:33 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm)

The Chevy Equinox , Pontiac Torrent and Suzuki xl-7 are made in Ingersol Ontario Canada. These suv are based on the Saturn Vue plateform. GM uses the old 3.4 litre engines but now has the new 3.6 in the sport and GXP. The Suzuki uses only the 3.6 litre engine. The Equinox was designed in GM 's Oshawa Ontario design center. Also 100 special fuel effecient Equinox were made in Oshawa to be used in selected cities in the U.S. for test markets and research.
#2088 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [camiguy] by nvbanker
May 14, 2008 (6:57 am)
Reply

Replying to: camiguy (May 09, 2008 10:33 pm)

Yes, I stand corrected, thanks to everyone. One more editorial on the engine - the 3.4L motor I have had several of, and each one has disappointed me by failing catastrophically once the car hit the 70,000 mile range, by either breaching an intake manifold gasket and leaking coolant outside the motor, or worse, INSIDE the motor - the one I currently have dumps it into the crankcase. This is not a good long-term motor, so if you're considering an Equinox, get the 3.6L motor. Just my advice.
#2089 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by commuter10
May 14, 2008 (10:17 am)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 6:57 am)

I read that the gasket problem you speak of was fixed a few years back, and was on an older domestic version of the 3.4l. What year engines were your 3.4s?
 
Thanks!
#2090 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [commuter10] by nvbanker
May 14, 2008 (12:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: commuter10 (May 14, 2008 10:17 am)

You may be right - mine were a 2000 and a 2001. IMO though, it's still a crappy engine. Although, it seems better than it used to be in the new Equinoxes I've driven.
#2091 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by jim_dandy
May 14, 2008 (1:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 6:57 am)

That is a none issue with the Equinox's 3.4L.
 
It has the redesigned gasket, manifold, and bolts.
 
In this case it's better to stick to a motor that has the problems worked out and fixed,
then to try and take a chance new unproven motor. Just my advice.
 
By the way my local GM sevice dealer gets Equinox's in his shop with 100,000miles for routine maintenace only.
#2092 of 2239
Re: I thought about it, yep, Equinox still better. [nvbanker] by grosloup
May 14, 2008 (6:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 12:44 pm)

I once had a 1999 chevrolet Venture and it had a 3.4 L. also and at 37,000 miles I had to replace the head gasket. Now I own a 2005 Equinox with the 3.4 L. engine and no problem with the gaskets and I'm at 22,500 miles.
The only thing I can't figure out is that it's a bit harder on gas consumption than my Venture was. Go figure!
#2093 of 2239
05 Equinox City Gas Mileage, Is Odometer Accuracy Off? by jim_dandy
May 17, 2008 (5:26 am)
Reply
grosloup, I don't know why you Venture would be better than the Equinox, other than the different transmission and shift points the Equinox has.
 
I did discover my odometer reading is not accurate with city driving. Maybe you or someone else can confirm this. I do remember reading a thread on this odometer error problem awhile back.
 
In city driving, I found the Odometer .5 miles off for 5 miles driven and 1 mile off for 10 miles driven. My Odometer reading was 4.5 for 5 miles and 9.0 for 10 miles!
I confirmed this with two other cars I owned, by taking the exact same 5 mile multiple stop-and-go route.
The positive thing about this is the mileage warranty is longer, the negative is poorer gas mileage calculations, so 300 miles on a tank of gas is really 330miles on a tank of gas.
At 330 miles instead of 300, this would add about 1.5 to 2.0 city mpg increase of actual gas mileage.
 
On the highway, I used the mile markers to verify my odometer and found it reading 9.8 miles for 10 miles of driving. Not as bad but still .2 miles short.
 
Just wondering if this is an odometer error issue with just mine or all 2005 Equinox's?

Messages Page 210 of 225
1
...
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
...
225
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement