You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Chevrolet Equinox
Chevrolet Equinox

2239 messages, Last post on Nov 15, 2009 at 5:07 PM
You are in the Chevrolet Equinox Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
I do like the Ford Escape, engine and fuel economy is about the same, but I like the looks of the Equinox better. Both have towing capability of 3500lbs. Ford makes nice trucks. Now the Kia Sportage is a whole different animal compared to the Equinox or Escape. Or should I say, a squirrel compared to a jack rabbit. The Sportage can't even tow 3500lbs.! The Sportage mpg is 17/23mpg. Equinox is 17/24mpg. The Sportage engine 173hp/178ft-lb torque. Equinox is 185hp/210ft-lb torque. The Sportage has black bumpers. Equinox is colored keyed. The Sportage looks Blahhhh! I also went to the Sportage "Maintenance and Repair" blog site. Check out message #299. lmp4, "Kia Sportage Maintenance and Repair" #299, 18 Mar 2008 3:05 am There is a great discussion with pics on a 2001 Kia Sportage "Exploding Transfer Case". So much for a reliable Kia drivetrain. |
|
|
Replying to: jim_dandy (May 01, 2008 4:41 pm) I have purchased both for customers - Personally, I prefer the Escape of the 3. It's a Japanese design (Mazda), built in Michigan, the Equinox is a GM design, built in Mexico. The Kia is Korean, not that there's anything wrong with that - but it's built in Korea and VietNam. If you get the VietNam edition, they tend to have problems. I rented a Sportage and put 800 miles on it in Costa Rica in a week. It performed flawlessly, but was less fun and less comfy than either the Escape or the Equinox. Beyond all that though, the Equinox is very nice driving and designed very well in the interior. The Escape is a tad more solid to me, and would be my first choice, either in the Escape, Mazda Tribute or Mercury Mariner version. 3 flavors, if you will, of the same candy. YMMV, but that's how I feel, having experience with all 3. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm) I have 22,000 miles on my 2006 and it has performed well so far. |
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 03, 2008 1:52 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: camiguy (May 09, 2008 10:33 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 6:57 am) Thanks!
|
|
|
Replying to: commuter10 (May 14, 2008 10:17 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 6:57 am) It has the redesigned gasket, manifold, and bolts. In this case it's better to stick to a motor that has the problems worked out and fixed, then to try and take a chance new unproven motor. Just my advice. By the way my local GM sevice dealer gets Equinox's in his shop with 100,000miles for routine maintenace only. |
|
|
Replying to: nvbanker (May 14, 2008 12:44 pm) The only thing I can't figure out is that it's a bit harder on gas consumption than my Venture was. Go figure! |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Chevrolet Equinox
Chevrolet Equinox
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Chevrolet Equinox



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats