Sign In Join 



Chrysler Crossfire

1519 messages,  Last post on Nov 21, 2009 at 7:29 PM

You are in the Chrysler Crossfire Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Chrysler Crossfire, Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6, Coupe, Convertible


Messages Page 5 of 152
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
152
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#41 of 1519
by logic1
Feb 17, 2003 (6:01 pm)
Reply
So the bright guys at Edmunds prefer either a bunch of Z clones or a coupe with great looks and appointments that is unfortunately too expensive for any of them to buy. Explains a lot I guess.
 
But it sure as heck does not caste my logic into any sort of suspicion.
#42 of 1519
0 - 60 by xa4
Feb 18, 2003 (7:27 am)
Reply
To say that it won't be able to do 0-60 in less than 8 seconds is silly. Going from 17" wheels to 18" and 19" wheels will sap a couple of horsepower at most. It's not going to add 2 seconds to acceleration times.
 
A 1999 Z3 at 2988 lbs with a paltry 170 hp makes the sprint to 60 in 6.7 seconds. The Crossfire with 26% more power and torque should hit 60 in under 6.0.
 
It'll be quick and will get quicker incrementally to keep you all interested for years.
#43 of 1519
good comment xa4 by jamessr
Feb 18, 2003 (9:55 am)
Reply
That is the whole idea coming from Chrysler. Up until recently hardly anybody had any buzz talk about Chrysler and now we all are salivating wondering and waiting to see whats going to happen next.
#44 of 1519
AutoWeek by jwilson1
Feb 19, 2003 (12:20 pm)
Reply
anticipates about 6 sec. 0-60.
 
If so, given the engine, perhaps there was some other gearing compromise.
 
JW
#45 of 1519
Chrysler and Celine Dion by oedipus1608
Feb 21, 2003 (12:09 pm)
Reply
I saw the Super Bowl commercial with Celine Dion in the Chrysler Crossfire. I sent an email to Chrysler asking them if they were marketing the Crossfire towards women. Their response is below.
 
Thank you for your email regarding Chrysler's association with Celine Dion.
 
Chrysler has teamed up with Celine Dion because we feel she portrays a wholesome attitude and image and embodies the family values that Chrysler tries to promote. Through her collaboration with Chrysler, we feel she will help us reach a wider potential consumer base since her music appeals to a wide audience.
 
We are not trying to market the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire as a "ladies'" or "men's" car, per se. We are simply trying to make the 2004 Chrysler Crossfire an appealing car to multiple segments of the car-buying population, and by doing that, we sometimes find that certain attributes of the vehicle appeal more to certain specific car-buying groups.
 
We are certainly not trying to alienate any segments of the car-buying public. I apologize if you feel our advertising is doing this.
 
Thank you again for sharing your opinion with us.
#46 of 1519
Chrysler Crossfire performance by oedipus1608
Feb 22, 2003 (2:48 pm)
Reply
The Crossfire shares the same 215hp engine with the MB SLK320. I looked at a past review of the SLK and it said that the SLK320 arrived at 60mph in 6.5 seconds. If that is so, the Crossfire might achieve a 0-60 time of 6 or less because it weighs less than the SLK.
#47 of 1519
by regfootball
Feb 22, 2003 (11:09 pm)
Reply
no way would i touch a car celine drives.....the crossfire will have a chick car stigma if they run too many more ads with her in it.
#48 of 1519
0-60 by jwilson1
Feb 23, 2003 (1:02 pm)
Reply
#46
 
On the CLK Edmund's posts a 7.5 time.
 
JW
#49 of 1519
Edmunds SLK 0-60 time for SLK by oedipus1608
Feb 23, 2003 (2:57 pm)
Reply
The SLK230's supercharged four-cylinder engine (SLK230) makes 192 horsepower, but for those who prefer the smooth torquey feel of a V6, the SLK320 offers a 3.2-liter, 215 horsepower V6. A six-speed manual is standard on both models, with a five-speed TouchShift automanual optional. The 0-to-60 mph sprinting ability of either model is respectable, with the 230 running that dash in around 7.5 seconds and the 320 beating that time by around a second. As one would expect, the performance of the SLK32 is thrilling, as it dispatches that performance yardstick in just 4.8 ticks of the stopwatch.
 
Notice that the Edmunds said that the SLK230 has a 0-60 time of 7.5 and the SLK320 has a 0-60 time a second less than the SLK230 which would be as I said before 6.5 seconds.
#50 of 1519
Thanks for the correction by jwilson1
Feb 23, 2003 (5:38 pm)
Reply

Messages Page 5 of 152
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
152
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement