Sign In Join 



I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today!

18065 messages,  Last post on Dec 08, 2009 at 8:26 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars


Messages Page 1784 of 1807
1
...
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
...
1807
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#17830 of 18065
Re: . [andre1969] by hpmctorque
Nov 08, 2009 (3:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 08, 2009 3:27 pm)

I don't recall which model it was, because I wasn't really interested in it. It stuck in my mind, though, because I remember that it just seemed odd that a domestic motor home manufacturer would choose a Renault diesel engine. I know Renault sells a lot of diesel cars in Europe (I rented a Clio diesel in Portugal) and elsewhere, but not in the U.S.
 
I was never in the market for a motor home, but I remember thinking that if I had been, I would have avoided one with a Renault engine. My reasoning was, even if it was a good engine, there are so few of them in the U.S. that I wouldn't feel confident about parts and service beyond the warranty.
 
Incidentally, that Clio I rented performed very well, and, as might be expected, delivered great fuel economy.
#17831 of 18065
Re: . [Mr_Shiftright] by explorerx4
Nov 08, 2009 (7:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 07, 2009 10:06 am)

under the radar - look under engines
#17832 of 18065
Re: . [explorerx4] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 08, 2009 (7:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: explorerx4 (Nov 08, 2009 7:50 pm)

That's not many cars---another classic case of where rare does not equal valuable.
 
Still, I wouldn't mind having one for a while. Not my kind of car but I could find some gold chains at the Thrift store
 
Here's one for sale! (scroll down)
 
http://carsforsale.classifieds1000.com/make/Lincoln/Mark_VII
 
As usual, it has the obligatory hallucinatory mileage claims we've come to know and love with sellers of diesel cars.
 
#17833 of 18065
Re: . [Mr_Shiftright] by hpmctorque
Nov 08, 2009 (9:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 08, 2009 7:54 pm)

"Not my kind of car but..."
 
Yeah, but wouldn't you prefer a V8 for the same money? I would.
#17834 of 18065
Re: . [hpmctorque] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 09, 2009 (7:07 am)
Reply

Replying to: hpmctorque (Nov 08, 2009 9:31 pm)

Nah, it's too ordinary. I'd buy Lincoln diesel for the engine, not for the car. It's just weird enough to appeal to me.
#17835 of 18065
Re: . [Mr_Shiftright] by andre1969
Nov 09, 2009 (7:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 09, 2009 7:07 am)

How much torque does that BMW Diesel have, I wonder? I know usually a Diesel will give up hp for additional torque, compared to a gasoline engine, but in those days they often had the bad habit of giving up both!
 
With around 116 hp, I'm guessing 0-60 in about 20 seconds or so? They were EPA-rated 23/29 (20/26 by the newer standards), so they are pretty economical for their bulk. But I don't know if I could put up with anything that slow. Maybe if you mainly just drive it around town, and all your interstate merges are long, downhill ramps.
#17836 of 18065
Re: . [Mr_Shiftright] by fintail
Nov 09, 2009 (7:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 09, 2009 7:07 am)

I'm with you on that. I'm sure the 302 in 84-85 wasn't exactly a hot rod unit anyway...might as well have something that's kind of a freakshow, and I don't think it is known to be especially problematic.
#17837 of 18065
Re: . [andre1969] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Nov 09, 2009 (8:40 am)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Nov 09, 2009 7:30 am)

I'd expect it to be leisurely but not that slow. A Mercedes 300D without turbo is about an 18-20 second car, so this Lincoln has more HP, same weight about, and a turbo.
 
The big problem with these older diesel "slugs" is when you get stuck in the right lane of a freeway---you don't have the power to move into the next lane to your left---it's downright scary.
#17838 of 18065
Re: . [Mr_Shiftright] by tjc78
Nov 09, 2009 (8:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Nov 09, 2009 8:40 am)

I have very little experience with anything Diesel except our Dodge Sprinter van here at work. I drove it recently to pick up some supplies for my showroom. From 0- 30 it felt like a race car and then the rest of the way it was very unimpressive. Once up to speed on the highway though had no trouble maintaining 75 with a full load.
#17839 of 18065
Re: . [tjc78] by andre1969
Nov 09, 2009 (9:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: tjc78 (Nov 09, 2009 8:48 am)

I just looked up the specs for the Sprinter 3.0, and it puts out 154 hp3400 rpm, but torque is crazy for such a little engine...280 ft-lb1200 rpm!
 
I know it would be more than likely illegal, but I wonder what kind of fuel economy you'd get out of that 3.0 if you could transplant it into a car? Say, something like my '79 New Yorker, or an 80's Town Car?

Messages Page 1784 of 1807
1
...
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
...
1807
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement