Sign In Join 



I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today!

17833 messages,  Last post on Nov 08, 2009 at 9:31 PM

You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Classic Cars


Messages Page 1667 of 1784
1
...
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
...
1784
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#16656 of 17833
Re: . [andys120] by fintail
Jul 03, 2009 (3:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andys120 (Jul 03, 2009 11:54 am)

I wish I knew how determine the exact year...it was tough to get a good pic. Normal (digital) camera, I usually keep it in the door when I go on a long drive.
#16657 of 17833
. by fintail
Jul 04, 2009 (12:34 pm)
Reply
Spotted at a used car lot in podunk, this gargantuan 62 Olds:
 

 

 

 
(cellphone pics)
 
I didn't post the drivers side pic because there's a big dent in the front fender that makes the car look pretty horrible . The paint is old and faded unevenly - original perhaps, and metallics never age well if not maintained. Light surface rust on the chrome that could easily be cleaned, but not much rust on the body. Rotten old tires, who knows what it is like under the hood. Interior was pretty decent though, and I noticed it had a Wonderbar radio. It's not as nice as it looks in the pics, but it's not horrible and shouldn't totally be a lost cause if one can do work by themselves. They want $2500 for it, but I am sure it could be had for 2 grand or less.
#16658 of 17833
I like it.... by ghulet
Jul 05, 2009 (1:47 am)
Reply
....I especially like the weirdo deep-set steering wheel center and the football-shaped taillights. Wondering what the upholstery looks like under those nasty covers (front, anyway).....looks like factory A/C (see vents...not unusual for a 98) and power windows, no? Unless it's a basket case, $2500 doesn't seem so bad....I'm huge fan of four-door hardtops, they're tough to find in general (at least if eBay is any indication)......seems for every 4HT, there are 10 two-doors or convertibles in every ilk.
#16660 of 17833
Sighted by lokki
Jul 05, 2009 (5:20 am)
Reply
1970 Dodge Charger 500 with the bumblebee stripe across the rear fenders and trunk at the local highend car wash. Looked like an unmolested original - very good, without looking overly glossy. No loud exhaust, original wheels. Had the original Waco Texas Dealer's logo on the trunk
 
Excellent BUT: It was that soft green the Chrysler liked in those years, with a white vinyl top and a green interior.
 
Somehow that dragged the desirabilty meter down into the low end for me. I understand about how hot it gets in Texas, so the white top makes practical sense. Still, since there's nothing practical about a 1970 Dodge Charger anyhow, why not a black roof.
 
Would putting black vinyl in place of the white bring up the desirability enough to offset the fact that the car wouldn't be factory original anymore?
 
It sure would have in my book.
 
Looked like this but not this pretty green
 

 
More like this green... but a little softer
 
#16661 of 17833
Re: Sighted [lokki] by andre1969
Jul 05, 2009 (5:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: lokki (Jul 05, 2009 5:20 am)

Good lord, it looks like they offered just about every color under the sun in 1970! Here's a Dodge paint chart from that year
 
They had SIX shades of green that year! There was a light green that seemed popular back then, sort of a sage green I think it's called, that I always thought was pretty nice. Probably what Chrysler called the "light green poly", while that olive color was probably the "dark green poly". I wonder what shade of green that Charger with the white roof is? Looks metallic, and emerald to me, and I don't think it really matches up to anything on that paint chart. Of course, sometimes those scanned-in images don't always reflect the true color.
 
I got to experience first-hand what a difference color can make when it comes to heat, when I bought my second '79 New Yorker. It's midnight blue, with a matching cloth interior that's sort of a corduroy pattern, with a bit of vinyl trim in places. My first NYer is light creme, with a matching leather interior. On hot days, the blue one becomes downright brutal, and heats up much more quickly, and much worse, than the creme one. I knew color made some difference, but didn't think it would be THAT noticeable! Still, that's changing the color of everything...body, roof, and interior. I wonder how much of a difference changing just the roof would make?
 
Those old 60's cars (and for all intents and purposes, a '70 Charger is still a 60's car) tended to have better fresh-air ventilation than later cars, what with the vent windows, roll-down rear windows, the big fresh-air vents under the dash, etc. Plus, they weren't sealed as tightly, which probably helped with heat build-up. And I imagine even little details, like the way the side glass curved in so much more on the 70's cars, letting in more of the sun's rays, made a difference. So even with a black roof, something like that Charger might not be too bad.
 
My '68 Dart used to be black, with a black vinyl interior, and I don't remember it being too bad. I was a lot younger back then, though...22 when I bought the car, and 23 when I repainted it back to its original white, so I probably had a higher tolerance for pain back then!
#16662 of 17833
Re: I like it.... [ghulet] by fintail
Jul 05, 2009 (6:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: ghulet (Jul 05, 2009 1:47 am)

I was actually thinking that was the stock upholstery - the colors went perfectly with the paint, and they sure looked to fit tightly enough to be stock upholstery. It could just be a bad pic. IIRC the rear seats were the same pattern.
 
I think it had PW, yeah...the little cranks are for the wing/vent windows, I think....I remember my Galaxie had normal cranks for the side windows, and small ones for the wing/vent windows. The fintail just has a round dial that is turned to open those windows.
 
I think that car would be a fair enough deal for 2 grand, assuming that it has no major mechanical needs....but if one does a nut and bold restoration, they are still going to be buried alive in it.
#16663 of 17833
Re: I like it.... [fintail] by andre1969
Jul 05, 2009 (7:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Jul 05, 2009 6:59 am)

The upholstery on the seats might just not look right because of the glare from the sun washing it out? I believe the pattern of the fabric should match the fabric that's on the door panels.
 
Sounds like it might be a neat car to have and drive around in for $2K or, hopefully, less. Like Ghulet, I've always had a thing for those big 4-door hardtops. I'd never put any serious money into it though, unless it was a true labor of love.
#16664 of 17833
Re: I like it.... [andre1969] by fezo
Jul 05, 2009 (12:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 05, 2009 7:05 am)

Andre - was flipping trough the channels the other day and came across My Cousin Vinny. (Not that I haven't seen it before.) When they get to the part about whether you could get a Tempest or a Buick in the same color I immediately thought of you and the paint chips....
#16665 of 17833
Re: I like it.... [andre1969] by fintail
Jul 05, 2009 (3:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: andre1969 (Jul 05, 2009 7:05 am)

Yeah, I think the seat inserts match the lighter blue part of the door panels, below the darker blue ribbed vinyl.
 
What would that thing have in it, like a 394?
 
I will say I like that color combo a lot...the exterior color reminds me of the "diamond blue" of my old W126...a color that doesn't seem to work well on most modern cars...or it is seen very seldom anyway.

Messages Page 1667 of 1784
1
...
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
...
1784
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement