Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Acura TSX Acura TSX
5068 messages, Last post on Nov 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM
You are in the Acura TSX Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 26, 2007 11:47 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: nj2pa2nc (Jun 26, 2007 12:25 pm) Let me rephrase that since the 2008 tsx is already out. Will the next TSX get an up graded I4(210hp?) and the RDX's 2.3l Turbo with 250hp and 270lbs ft? Not to mention the 2.2l CTDI diesel engine.... That on the Sports4 is to die for...  -Cj |
|
|
|
|
I was contemplating the TSX and narrowed the competition to the Mazda 6. About the same list price new, but probably better deals on the 6. Found a 2005 6 loaded, and went with that. The V6 power is fun with a manual. The one we bought has leather, auto climate, Bose stereo, roof, etc, so comparable to the TSX. We lost Homelink, memory seats, and Ipod link. I think the 6 is a much better looking car. If we bought new, we probably would have gone with the TSX, better colors, easier to find one, as the option list is so small, just pick color, trans and nav or no nav. Probably would have had to order a 6 equipped as we wanted. So, forget the ugly Altima and uglier Accord, look at a Mazda 6.
|
|
|
Replying to: scottmsimpson (Jun 26, 2007 6:57 pm) |
|
|
The wife and I were looking into adding a Mazda 5 door touring sedan to replace my commuter 97 Honda Accord (nothing wrong with Accord, just a lot of miles). The Mazda does sound good on paper and it has a lot of value compared to other cars in its class (love the 4 doors + hatchback feature). Our 06 TSX has really spoiled us with its luxury appointments, technology, fit/finish, and balance of power/economy compared to the Mazda I-4 (didn’t want the Ford V-6). The TSX isn’t really that much more $$$ compared to a similarly equip Mazda. Unfortunately, the Mazda resell value doesn’t come close to the TSX down the road. We decided to keep the Accord and wait on the all new TL/TSX down the road or reconsider the RDX if they make a few improvements. |
|
|
Replying to: mf15 (Jun 26, 2007 7:11 am) At least with the auto, it certainly isn't fast off the line, especially if you're comparing to an Altima with a V6. |
|
|
I think the RL has a Active Noise Cancelling system in-built to reduce the cabin noise, has anyone come across any such system for the TSX? I am looking for an aftermarket ANC system that could perform the same function of noise cancellation using the existing car speakers. Btw, I am planning to get this for my 2007 TSX. Let me know if anyone of you knows of any website/shop that sells this kind of system.
|
|
|
Replying to: orion75 (Jun 28, 2007 11:01 am) |
|
|
Replying to: fedlawman (Jun 26, 2007 11:47 am) That was my point exactly. Therefore you and I have no idea what effect running regular or mid-grade is having. In all probability, the timing is not being retrarded a great majority of the time and during this time, there is no downside. Also, if you don't live at sea level in a warm climate then you don't need as high of an octane level. Add to that the fact that the octane level is underrepresented in the pump number, and the "need" for premium in a normally aspirated mid-compression engine is dubious at best. Also, the lower flash point of the higher octane gasoline is what allows a higher compression ratio.
|
|
|
Replying to: tradscott (Jun 29, 2007 8:17 am) Which is exactly why I follow the manufacturers recommendation and pay the extra 20 cents. Superior engine performance, optimum economy/emissions, and added detergents to prevent/clean deposits on injectors, valves, etc. It's worth it to me.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Acura TSX
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
