2003 Saab 9-3 - READ ONLY

185 messages, Last post on Nov 04, 2002 at 6:21 AM

You are in the Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h

This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Future Vehicles Host for Directions! discussion.

What is this discussion about? Saab 9-3, BMW 3 Series, Audi A4, Sedan

Outline

Messages Page 9 of 19: 1; ...; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; ...; 19; Prev; Next; Last

#81 of 185 by beartrax79 Sep 11, 2002 (1:41 pm)
I dunno, logic1. If you were looking at a 9-3 with AWD and a 9-3 with FWD, why would you choose the FWD?
#82 of 185 by magnetophone Sep 11, 2002 (1:47 pm)
It's not like having AWD as an option will turn off the FWD fans.
#83 of 185 by beartrax79 Sep 11, 2002 (2:15 pm)
I'd have to say that's debateable, but regardless I plan to walk in for a test drive on the first wintry day. I am a bit curious also on how the ReAxs will work in the snow. Anyone know of anyone else using this technology?
#84 of 185 by logic1 Sep 11, 2002 (4:30 pm)
My first preference is rwd. If I was chosing between fwd and awd, no contest, fwd. I like challenges in my life. If I do not want a challenge when I drive, I take the damn train.
#85 of 185 by dindak Sep 12, 2002 (7:41 am)
AWD is nice, but I would never get it. It's not worth the extra bucks to me. I just want a sporty sedan with good power and great handling. The new 9-3 looks to fit the bill as a contender.
#86 of 185 by kirstie_h HOST Sep 12, 2002 (11:35 am)
logic1, enough challenges are already presented by many of those with whom I share the road I don't need help from my vehicle. kirstie_h Roving Host & Future Vehicles Host
#87 of 185 by dudleyr Sep 12, 2002 (1:20 pm)
I would take front wheel drive over all wheel drive any day. AWD uses too much fuel (look at Legacy 27 mpg on highway vs Accord 34 and Camry 33) and is way too expensive (compared to snow tires which do more to help the car in the snow). I like to keep things simple and effecient. As far as AWD helping handling, that only applies for very high horsepower vehicles on low traction surfaces driven extremely fast - rally cars. Not really the case on U.S. highways. An Outback has AWD, does it handle better than a FWD SAAB?
#88 of 185 Kristie_H by logic1 Sep 12, 2002 (1:45 pm)
I understand your position 100%. But Saab has always been a niche player. GM has to play it smart and make the new Malibu that will be based on the same platform as the 9-3 a car that the more conservative 95% of the sedan market will want to buy. dudleyr: Good point about the mileage. A continuing complaint in the G35 forum is the poor mileage the owners are getting with the car. Knock another 1 or 2 mpgs off when it goes awd. IMO, awd's primary benefit is constancy.
#89 of 185 Think I might by logic1 Sep 12, 2002 (4:56 pm)
be first here to report an official on the road sighting! Coming home from court today I noticed a shiney red sports sedan out of the corner of my eye. At first I thought it was a 3 Series. When it came even with me, I realized it was a brand spanking new 9-3 (With regular plates too. Not a dealer car.) Traffic was pretty heavy so I really could not stare. I like what I saw though. It has clean lines and a markedly different windshield for Saab, but still looks distinctive and like its ancestors. The gaps are minimal. The lines from front to back very clean. Red is a little loud for my taste, but the paint really looked rich. I will not have time to test drive one this weekend, but a test will be in order soon.
#90 of 185 logic1 by bigdaddycoats Sep 12, 2002 (6:46 pm)
It must have been a GM company car. I would imagine that they are starting to be used as company vehicles in the Detroit area. Where did you see it? They don't officially go on sale to October. GM company cars can have normal plates. If it is a company car it will most likely have a bar code sticker in the lower drivers corner on the front windshield. Hard to see while driving though.