You are here:
Forums
Future Vehicles
Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions
2003 Saab 9-3 ![]()

185 messages, Last post on Nov 04, 2002 at 6:21 AM
You are in the Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h
This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost? Ask the Future Vehicles Host for Directions! discussion.
|
Congrads on your purchase ... wagon or sedan ? . I want to like the Subies, my recent trip to the Poconos were all over the place. Unfortunatly a few things keep me away. One is i cant set in a cloth car without getting a nasty shock! And the other is its a little on the smaller side.Not any worse than a IS mind you, matter a fast to me that IS300 is a joke at 36k, should have been a yota at 24k.. good luck DL |
|
|
I ended up getting a sedan. I actually liked the the cloth seats in the WRX, but did see one with aftermarket leather coverings. Looked really nice. The new 9-3 should be bigger on the inside (from the pictures) and definitely looks more luxurious than the WRX. Also, Saabs have a reputation (if I remember correctly) as being a very good bad weather vehicle. Finally, snow tires might help your current car. People on these boards have been praising the Bliztaks for their bad weather handling. |
|
|
|
| Saab is a luxury car? Yeah right? Saab wants to compete with the big european carmakers? Fat chance. I just received a promo mailing card regarding the 2003 9-3 and decided to investigate further. My search came to grinding halt when I discovered that the Saab is a FWD vehicle!! If I'm going to drive a "sports sedan" I must have RWD or an optional AWD system at my disposal. Why isn't Saab stepping up to the plate? | |
|
|
|
Hello, clueless! Saab has ALWAYS been FWD, even back in the days when there were no FWD cars. They have always used this layout and it is about as ubiquitous as the centre-mounted key. If you would read the foreign reviews of this car, you'd know that they have considered it to be a very capable, sporty car. If I wanted a true "sports car" like a 911 or something like that, then RWD would be necessary. But on a "sporty sedan", it is not necessary. Your search came to a grinding halt? You should have known that Saabs have always been FWD. That's like saying "Why does Saab use a turbo?" It's completely antithetical. Audi uses FWD just fine and is a very competitive Euro brand. |
|
|
|
| I went to test drive it and I couldn't even find where the key went......LOL! | |
|
|
| Geez, I just found out it was made in Sweden.... LOL! | |
|
had a nice review, the frame is is 4x more rigid than the old one.And no torque steer DL |
|
|
I could be wrong, but in a country that gets a lot of winter weather, doesn't it make sense for their auto manufacturers to cater to that market by offering a lot of FWD and AWD vehicles. Doesn't that make sense? kirstie_h Roving Host & Future Vehicles Host |
|
| Methinks that is what the folks at Saab have said for many a year. | |
|
...the same could be said for Volvo. For years they made nothing but RWD and have only recently gone FWD/AWD AFAIK. Here in New England we seem to have a disproportianate number of SAABs, Volvos, and Subarus. I remember a local auto writer once bringing up the differences between SAABs and Volvos on the configuration and stated that they both knew how to make a vehicle that performed in snow. So it seems that anything will work if engineered properly and in capable hands - emphasis on the latter!! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Future Vehicles
Future Vehicles - Archived Discussions
2003 Saab 9-3 ![]()
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 Saab 9-3
2010 BMW 3 Series
2010 Audi A4



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats