You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars
1960's Ford Falcons

133 messages, Last post on Feb 05, 2008 at 7:50 AM
You are in the Classic Cars Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
| a Schwinn could outrun them (I owned one). | |
|
I own a 62 sedan with the 'big' motor 170 cid. It runs fairly well for the size of the engine. It can sit for 2 weeks and I can get in it , pull the choke knob(remember those?) and it will start in about 2 seconds of cranking. |
|
|
|
| Is that a one-speed Schwinn or a mountain bike (I'm thinking the Falcon automatic could maybe pull away off the line if you were riding on an older Schwinn) | |
|
..... 2.8 L! But, that 85 h.p. left much to be desired! How was the 0-60 timed ..... in minutes? As I remember, the 170 had the blue valve cover while the 200 (3.3 L) had red. |
|
|
...rated at 85 hp, or was that the 144? I seem to recall one of the Falcon engines rated at 101 hp. The 170 CID version of the Mopar slant six was rated around 100-110 hp, so I'd imagine that Ford's 170 was pretty close. Anyway, I'd imagine 0-60 in the lower 20-second range for the 144. Maybe 17-18 seconds for the 170? Just wild guesses here. |
|
|
|
| 144 had 85 raging horsepower. No one knows what its 0-60 time was...they always gave up after a few hours and went out to lunch. | |
|
|
| I bet you could figure it out with an egg timer. | |
|
You are right, the 144 (2.3 L) was 85 h.p. and with the blue valve cover. The 170 had 101 h.p. with the red cover. I don't know what the color was for the later 200 c.i.d. engine. We had the '61 and '62 Falcons, both with the mighty 144. Maybe it only made 60 mph in neutral and going downhill ........ |
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars
1960's Ford Falcons
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats