Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups Toyota Tundra Toyota Tundra vs. Chevrolet Silverado 
2059 messages, Last post on Mar 29, 2007 at 5:33 AM
You are in the Toyota Tundra Forum. Your Host is kcram
All of you!  Toyota, and the Tundra, are wrong, and you are right. The Tundra should not have redesigned the truck, and the current Tundra is what Toyota, and America needs, a weaker, more genteel representative. It should be car-like, and ride nice, and not have too much power, because power really isn't what's important in a pick-up anyway. Smaller brakes and less towing would be preferable. And please don't give me a choice of a big back seat, or the biggest back seat, because then I might lose 3 inches of beg length, and then the truck will be worthless. And why would you charge less than $30k for the strongest truck in the class? A RC 5.7 for $25k? What? That's dumb!! These guys are dopes! What the h$%# is that about? Put that on the Limited model only, so you could really a $40k truck worthwhile! Wet behind the ears!  And since Toyota trucks have such a reputation for rattling and being old pieces of junk, let's do what eevrybody else does to fix the chronic problems with their trucks! Because Toyota obviously doesn't know what they-re doing, and everybody else knows much better, and have been using better frames for all of 5 years now. And since Toyota can't build a HD model, the Tundra doesn't really count because nobody buys a half-ton to be strong, or tow, or carry weight, or anything else but pack with groceries. Wheels are too big, brakes are too big, buttons are too big. Give me a Colorado before I shot myself! Please save me from sorry excuses for trucks like Toyota Tundra. Someday Toyota will get it's act together and build a decent full-sized truck. Someday.  DrFill |
|
|
Replying to: geo9 (Mar 28, 2007 1:58 pm) Do some research first. Hint: ALSD Do you prefer to be possibly injured slightly more, somewhere from 1% to 19%, in a frontal collision? OR Do you prefer to be possibly more dead in a rollover or side crash because there are no Side and Curtain airbags or Stability Control on your T900? Forget the T800's.
|
|
|
Replying to: jimsevers (Mar 28, 2007 2:15 pm) 1500# in the bed and a 4500# trailer. I'm suggessting that the 'common knowledge' about trucks may be about to change. Things that a 1/2 ton never could be considered to do might from now onward be considered. From a commercial pov some of the lighter diesel work might now be considered for the new generation 1/2 tonners...but at a $5000-$8000 discount. We'll see. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: erich1965 (Mar 28, 2007 12:19 pm) a dually is better when hauling something that outweighs the tow vehicle by a factor of 2. |
|
|
Replying to: pmusce (Mar 28, 2007 3:33 pm) We'll have to see.
|
|
|
Replying to: dave8697 (Mar 28, 2007 4:28 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Mar 28, 2007 5:29 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: dave8697 (Mar 28, 2007 4:28 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: kdhspyder (Mar 28, 2007 5:39 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: jimsevers (Mar 28, 2007 5:41 pm) The side/curtain airbag and stability contro issue is far more important than the 4 vs 5 stars. Let's just keep the subject in perspective. Whenever anyone brings up the NHTSA test on one Reg Cab model I only ask why GM and Ford don't even offer S/C airbags and stability control on all their Reg Cab models. The level of risks aren't nearly the same. So by 2010 the the others will finally reach the safety level of the Tundra. I accept that. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Pickups Toyota Tundra Toyota Tundra vs. Chevrolet Silverado
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Toyota Tundra
2010 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
