Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Vans & Minivans Toyota Sienna Toyota Sienna Future Models
2021 messages, Last post on Jul 01, 2009 at 11:47 AM
You are in the Toyota Sienna Forum. Your Host is Karens
|
Replying to: samnoe (Dec 16, 2008 6:13 pm) You talk about all the "high points" of the Chrysler and on paper they sound great. But as you pointed out, in reality, its a piece of junk. 1) The interior fit/finish/build quality looks like it was done by the same people who design and build the junk toys they sell at wall mart. Reach under the seat to activate the tilt and prey you don't slit your hand on cheasy shart plastic 2) I've had lots of nav systems, both portable and integrated (including Lexus & Infiniti). Once you get used to it, the Toyota/Lexus is the quickest to use for everyday operations. I do agree the legal nanny's with the prevention of use while moving is very dumb. I'm in the tech industry and I couldn't figure out how to use even the most basic functions on the chrysler system. the screen was so crowded and relatively low resolution and crude graphics. The usable area to show the map was very small. In addition, the stereo itself sounded very weak compared to the toyota (although both were weak compared to my old IS250) To put it simply, if I had to buy the chrysler, I would still have to go out and buy a portable GPS to have a usable solution. It's garbage. 3) The satelite tv is a gimick. 3 whopping channels at very low resolution. 4) The center console literally was wobbly. Again, shoddy interiors. Dashboard looked typical chrysler cheap. The only chrysler I''ve seen that has a half respectable interior is the now discontinued crossover stationwagon they had. can't think of the name. 5) The chrysler was noticeably smaller on the inside. Especially the rear storage area. The seats were way too close to the floor (the price of that so called wonderful underseat storage). That also meant headroom was less than the toyota when moving around. 6) I know its a matter of opinion but the chrysler is now one of the ugliest minivans. The last generation was much more attractive then these new box on wheels look.. 7) The lighting is adequate. I've had LED lighting in the lexus, and yes it is nice. My real beef is that if somebody manually turns on an interior light and you leave the car, it stays on until the battery dies. There is no way from the front to shut off a light without shutting off all interior lighting. Very dumb. That being said, the 2 of the 4 lights of the showroom chrylser I saw were lose. You had to jiggle them to get them on. Again, crap quality. 8) The AWD is great. you get suv security in the northeast with minivan practicality. Chrylser gave up on it to keep room for those supposedly great storage compartments. What good is underseat storage if you can't get to where you need to in bad weather? 9) I will admit the digital hvac controls aren't that intuitive and its very difficult to control separate fan and temperature for the rear. They should do like lexus where the hvac is part of the all in one nav/radio system. I'm betting that will be the case for the next gen once they catch up. |
|
|
Replying to: jim1462 (Feb 07, 2009 11:40 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 09, 2009 10:32 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: timothyh (Feb 09, 2009 11:09 am) There's still the New York show in April, that is unless they postpone the intro by a year due to the economy. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 09, 2009 11:20 am) Tim in Japan |
|
|
|
|
it was slated for this coming year as a 2010 model but it has been pushed back another year. if everything went according to plan, the newly redesigned model should be in production in 2010. rumor is no hybrid for the first year introduction but might appear in 2-3 years. a 4 cylinder is also possible. to comment on previous post, the '04 model was touted as a 'lexus of minivan' and not 'a cadillac ...' by the press |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: Tim_in_Japan (Feb 10, 2009 2:11 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: eandlcubed (Feb 10, 2009 9:06 am) |
|
|
Replying to: Tim_in_Japan (Feb 10, 2009 2:11 am) I'm curious what specifically impressed you about the JDM vans versus the Sienna?
|
|
|
Replying to: yatesjo (Feb 10, 2009 12:56 pm) Toyota brought the Venza instead, for instance. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Vans & Minivans Toyota Sienna Toyota Sienna Future Models
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2011 Toyota Sienna
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
