Sign In Join

Infiniti G35 G37 Prices Paid and Buying Experience

6205 messages,  Last post on Jul 23, 2008 at 7:45 PM

You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx

What is this discussion about? Infiniti G35, Infiniti G37, Coupe, Sedan


Messages Page 595 of 621
1
...
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
...
621
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5936 of 6205
Re: G35x - Good Deal? [brodway] by mpkrasner
May 14, 2008 (12:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 13, 2008 8:16 pm)

I'm looking to get the 36 month lease. According to what I've read in this discussion thread, I thought $450 above invoice was a good price. I'm not sure how the "incentive" or "upfront" cost is over since it only incorporates the first month's payment ($489), bank fee ($595), motor vehicle fee ($375), NJ state tire tax ($7.50), upfront taxes ($55.58) and doc fee ($199), which equals $1721.08.
 
If the deal is $450 over invoice, then by my numbers the net cap cost would be $37235 for a car with an MSRP of $40175 and an invoice of $36785 with a monthly payment of $521.07 and an upfront cost of $1232 w/o the first month's payment or $1722 with the first month's payment.
#5937 of 6205
Re: G35x - Good Deal? [mpkrasner] by brodway
May 14, 2008 (2:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mpkrasner (May 14, 2008 12:32 pm)

If the first month payment is already included in the payment, then your upfront costs are ok. You didn't specify initially that the first month payment was included in the upfront payment. But all the other numbers look legitimate.
 
Re-running the numbers you provided, specifically 450 over invoice is coming out at $488.70 which puts you right at that same $489 per month. So overall a solid deal.
#5938 of 6205
Re: G35XS nav/prem/sport - Help me backwork these numbers! [brodway] by bcarter610
May 14, 2008 (5:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 14, 2008 8:47 am)

Hey Brodway - you have a very good point. I asked that she send me all the #'s she used to get at the price we're at. I should have more info for you some time late tomorrow. Thanks for all the responses - your feedback has been very helpful. As you can probably tell, this is my first go'round with leasing a car on my own. I've driven a 2002 Honda Accord (my first car) for the last 5 years, and i've decided it's time for something new! I look forward to hearing your responses when I get some more complete information. Thanks every1!
#5939 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [brodway] by stkntraffic
May 14, 2008 (6:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 14, 2008 8:38 am)

The only thing I wonder about the multiple security deposits- is it more of a hassle to get your money back at the end of the lease? Meaning, do they find all kinds of BS problems they want to charge you for? I remember turning in a car a couple of years ago, and the leasing company tried to nick me for a number of issues. I pushed back and they dropped the charges, but still I wonder...
#5940 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [stkntraffic] by brodway
May 14, 2008 (7:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: stkntraffic (May 14, 2008 6:42 pm)

If you have met all the requirements of the lease agreement and turned in a vehicle that is within reasonable condition, there is no reason why they shouldn't give you your money back. Like banks and financial institutions, IFS has to answer to banking regulators for their actions.
#5941 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [brodway] by dwynne
May 14, 2008 (8:00 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 14, 2008 7:11 pm)

Someone posted here that they talked to IFS and their insurance and they were told that in the event of a total loss IFS would take the security deposits off of the current buy out price and then expect the balance from the insurance company. If they really did it that way, then your MSDs are no more secure than plopping down a large cap cost reduction.
 
Like you, *I* have always heard MSDs come back while cap cost reduction would be lost but I would want to make sure someone at IFS put it in writing somewhere that they would bill your insurance for full value and once paid return all of your MSD money (assuming you insurance paid out enough). Just something else to think about.
 
Dennis
#5942 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [dwynne] by brodway
May 14, 2008 (8:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dwynne (May 14, 2008 8:00 pm)

DWynne...If you have proper insurance coverage, the insurance company should indemnify you for any property damage incurred either to your vehicle or done by your vehicle. If you don't properly insure yourself or carry a very high deductible, then you absolutely are exposing the deposit. In any event, whether they have your deposit or not, if you total the car and don't pay off IFS completely you are still on the hook for the balance whether they have a deposit in place or not. If you don't pay them off they will sue you or put a lien against your assets. They work just like any other bank or financial insitution.
#5943 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [brodway] by dwynne
May 14, 2008 (9:04 pm)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 14, 2008 8:21 pm)

You missed the point .
 
If you have put down $3k in MSDs and your car is stolen or totalled what IFS said they would do (as told to a forum member) is take the $3k off off the amount due for the current value of the car and then expect the balance to be paid by the insurance company. The insurance company is happy to pay less than the market value of the car, if that is the case.
 
So if at the time the car was lost if you added up residual plus unpaid principle and interest and you got $30k. They would then expect $27k from the insurance and you would be out your MSD money. If your insurance will not pay $27k, saying current value of the car is less, then you are out $3k MSD and whatever else you owe (this is not likely).
 
If you paid the $3k up front the IFS would ask for the amount due and you would be out our cap cost reduction plus any difference between what your insurance pays and what the lease bank requires.
 
They way you and I think it should work would be for the lease bank to ask for $30k from your insurance, the insurance will pay fair market value, if that is $30k or more then the lease bank gets $30k and you get your $3k in MSDs back. If your insurance pays less then that comes out of the $3k in MSDs.
 
So if they do it as they told the forum member they did, your money is just as at risk with MSDs as it is with a cap cost reduction.
 
So what I am saying is if you are planning on doing MSDs you need to be SURE in writing how they are applied in the event of a loss. If they are merely a backstop should your insurance fail to satisfy the lease bank, then good. If they are the first thing applied to the loss, then bad.
 
When I have some more time I will try to search up the messages posted about this. If was most likely over in the G lease thread though.
 
Dennis
#5944 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [dwynne] by brodway
May 15, 2008 (7:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: dwynne (May 14, 2008 9:04 pm)

Ok i see your point. Having had some experience with property damage recovery, i can tell you first hand that the insurance company doesn't just pay the bank off what is owed to them or what they state is owed to them; nor do they run the numbers based on what the bank has as a deposit. They have an appraiser value the vehicle or run a valuation report and IF within reason pay off the loan amount. The only risk comes in when the appraisal of the vehicle is below the payoff amount. From my experience, this risk comes in 1 in 5 times, and it always happens when someone finances the vehicle at a very high rate of interest and the principal doesn't build quickly enough in the vehicle to satisfy the payoff amount which remains high.
 
With IFS leases the risk only comes into play is when you have a high residual, and if by chance your vehicle is either stolen or a declared a total loss, the appraisal comes in below the actual payoff. This can happen in the early stages of the lease as the vehicle loses a lot of value immediately after you leave the lot.
 
There are two ways to address this issue. First you can purchase gap insurance which i believe will insure one for the difference between what one would owe on a vehicle and what an insurance company says it's worth. Second, when you buy insurance coverage you need to check with your insurance carrier if the gap coverage is built into your premium. Good insurance companies will usually provide this coverage as part of their quote, but again you need to check with them specifically on this issue. Furthermore, i'm inclined to believe that IFS itself should provide this gap coverage on every lease or finance deal as they are exposed to this same deficit in capital if in fact one of their vehicles is involved in a collision where the car is totalled or stolen.
 
I also don't believe that because you don't have a deposit in place you are less exposed to the same risk. Whether IFS has a deposit or not, if they are owed money they will come after your via legal avenues. So if you leased a car and your car is stolen 3 days later, why do you believe the person that doesn't have a deposit is any less responsible for the full value of the vehicle as the one who does?
 
Just my 2 cents.
#5945 of 6205
Re: brodway....i'm intrigued [brodway] by dwynne
May 15, 2008 (9:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: brodway (May 15, 2008 7:43 am)

This belongs in the G lease forum, and there is a discussion over there about this topic.
 
I posted this message today about this topic and referenced what another user found out back in January when he talked to IFS and his insurance about what would happen.
 
I think the insurance companies handle lease cars differently. I you own your car outright then they make you happy. If you owe on in (loan) then they pay of the bank if there is enough money and give you the remainder, if any. On a lease, the bank owns it all you have no interest in it - you are renting it. So they pay off what the bank says is owed or the max they appraise - whichever is lower. Since you have ownership stake they give you nothing. As the user was told by IFS they would take the MSDs off the amount required to make them happy so the insurance would pay that reduced amount - assuming it was under appraised value.
 
It is like a mortgage on a home VS rent. If your house burns down the insurance pays off the mortgage and you get the balance. If you are renting and the apartment burns down the insurance pays off the folks who own the apartment, you get nothing.
 
Dennis

Messages Page 595 of 621
1
...
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
...
621
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement