You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Ford Mustang
Ford Mustang (2004 and earlier)

2105 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 5:27 PM
You are in the Ford Mustang Forum. Your Host is claires
|
Replying to: m1miata (Jun 27, 2005 10:04 pm) I think they're a great combination of current styling (well, at the time anyway) and heritage cues. Taillights, fake-scoop-o-rama and the door styling all evoke Mustangs of old, but without being overly and obviously retro. Also has a certain (to me anyway) muscle-car, "gimme your lunch money!" look to it that I enjoy. On the other two choices, while I think the 05s are great looking cars and I'm so impressed with the job Ford did, I'm beginning to find them *too* consciously retro. I know the look is a big reason for their success, but this is the first time the Mustang ever replicated a previous style in such a wholesale fashion; that doesn't sit perfectly well with me. Also, not sure I like how Mustangs are getting BIG again... As the years go by, though, I have to say that I like the style of the 1994-98s more and more. It's a little more restrained in style than the SN95 part II, and seems positively lithe, size-wise, next to an '05. I bet they age well, esp. the 1994-1995s with the 5.0. Just my .02. |
|
|
|
|
I've wanted a Mustang for a long time and am now interested in buying one. I'm interested in a used stang in the '99-'04 style and either a V6 or GT. This style is my favorite but I'm not sure which source of buying would be most beneficial to receive a reliable, low-priced, non-tortured Mustang. My options include local public auctions, e-bay, regular used car dealers or Certified Pre-owned Dealers. I was just wandering which form would be the best and safest for providing me with the best condition, least-costly Mustang in the '99-'04 style. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: dispencer1 (Jun 03, 2005 5:01 am) please comment |
|
|
|
|
i just love the way the 99 to 2004 stangs look.. the styling to me is exactly what a modern mustang should be... something that invokes the image of MUSCLE CAR!! now.. on the other hand.. the messed up ratio of weight in front makes the car fishtail in wet or snow conditions.... thats unacceptable... seems to me that the new mustangs have a better weight ratio.. |
|
|
Replying to: gt4me (Apr 23, 2002 6:09 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: arnie08515 (Jun 28, 2005 1:48 pm) Loren |
|
|
A post pretty much reflects my feelings on the older model vs. the new. I think the retro thing just about got too carried away. Almost became a replica car of 1968/69 model year. I too liked the 1994-98 for its modern rendition of the early model. It looks fresh, is not too large and heavy looking, and just looks new and smooth. The 1999 year did add some quality to performance, so that is an added value. The flat sides are the one distraction though to an otherwise neat new look. Then came the '05, which does look good. It looks good, but perhaps too much like what I already saw in a showroom as a kid, a few years back. Now GM could redo the 1967-69 Camaro, and have what I see as an ever more beautiful body. And Dodge could make the Challenger again. We all must shake our heads in wonder as to where they are going with the current Charger - just all too sad Loren |
|
|
Loren, I worry about the same thing. The Mustang's getting large again, just like it did back in the early to mid-1970s. And we all remember what happened after that... My '02 seemed pretty large compared to a Fox Body at the time I got it, or even compared to the 94-98 car. But next to an '05, it seems quite svelte. |
|
|
Replying to: wannastang1 (Jun 28, 2005 12:52 pm) |
|
|
Here in NJ at the NADE auction in Bordentown, Mustangs are going way over book value often 2,000 over book value. that $20.5k is probably the current market price. Mark |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Ford Mustang
Ford Mustang (2004 and earlier)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Mustang



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats