You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Ferrari
Ferrari-the Ultimate classic (Ferrari Lovefest Topic)

729 messages, Last post on Nov 01, 2008 at 8:45 AM
You are in the Ferrari Forum. Your Host is claires
Again, "Enzo", many thanks. I went to the Ron Tonkin website, and tried putting 456M in a search but it came up nil. I then put in 456GT and a very nice blue 1999 one came up for $134,900! Just to clarify, this probably in fact has to be an "M' because I believe all 456's from 1999 on were "modificata", would you agree? In any event, that seems an excessive price, don't you think -- at least by the expected depreciation curve? Also, Tonkin is in Oregon and I am in DC. What do you think of having it trucked across the country from the standpoint of : 1) possible damage; 2) cost; 3) practicality of doing this vs. finding one on the East coast? Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Replying to: enzo4re (Sep 22, 2005 9:31 am) Sure did, and it's good hearing from someone with first hand experience like yours. Congrats on the toddlers, as well. My kids were probably the biggest factor in my decision to go for the 911 Cab. And, although I've heard the "no soul" pitch from others that were partial to the pre-996 air cooled 911's, I am of a different opinion/preference. I had a fair amount of time behind the wheel of a 1987 930 Turbo and, while it was a lot of fun back then, it was a lot of work to drive. If I wanted to limit my use to 2,000+/- miles a year on the weekends, it - or better yet - a used 328, 355 or 360 - would probably be a better choice than paying full price for a new 997. But I would not bet against my putting 10,000 to 15,000 miles a year on the 997. And if my girls have anything to say about it, they will be in the back seat for more than 2000 miles a year! Again, thanks for your insights and congratulations on two great cars and two greater joys than any car. |
|
|
Replying to: neal4218 (Sep 22, 2005 1:03 pm) Yes, Its an M car. any event, that seems an excessive price, don't you think -- at least by the expected depreciation curve? Yes, thats a carzy price for a 99 and why it has been for sale for a long time..I am not sure what they are smoking but dealers are not known for their rational pricing of used ferraris! , although it looks perfect with very low miles. Its maybe $100k car but not a penny more IMO. $135k should buy you a perfect 2001/2002 car as a reference. This is one of the reasons why I like to buy my cars from other enthusiasts because some dealer's will gouge you sensless if you dont know what you are doing. The other main reason is I like to know FULL history of the car and whom I am buying it from. Most times a dealer will not accommodate these type of requests. Tonkin is in Oregon and I am in DC. What do you think of having it trucked across the country from the standpoint of : 1) possible damage; 2) cost; 3) practicality of doing this vs. finding one on the East coast? Any thoughts? My 355 came from the mid west and my 456 from CA and I am in the NY area. Its not a big deal. There are transportaion companies that specialize in shipping high end cars www.intercitylines.com will take care of any car you need transported. But the best way is to pick the car up yourself and drive it home wherever it is. You will have yourself one hell of a roadtrip! Because there are so few of these cars, the chances of you finding one and one that you WANT close to you is slim, you have to spread your search to cover the entire US. BTW Cauley Ferarri have a nice blue 2001 456m on their website. |
|
|
That price of over 130 seems way out of line. the only justification seems to be the low miles, but that becomes a catch 22. Recently a 328 sold around here for well into 70K because it only had 1200 original miles. Of course, it immediately lost that distinction while being driven home! Don't be afraid of higher mileage cars with EXCELLENT service records. Habitat 1, where in the Northeast are you? I might be able to help find a car through one of the Ferrari Club of America events. BTW, I strongly recommend joining the FCA, along with Fchat, they are a must for owners, and potential owners. There is a wealth of information available in those two sources. As to putting miles on, I put around 7K per year during our short driving season and both my mechanic and I think the car benefits from it. No more maintenance than you would expect from a 17 year old car. |
|
were probably a figment of my imagination, perhaps because of the 330LMB which was raced in GT classes and combined the nose of the GTO with the disinctive roofline of the 260 Lusso. Cool looking, huh |
|
|
Andy, Imagination is a wonderful thing and I'm willing to bet that somewhere a few Lussos saw track action. I've never seen the 330 from that angle, at least I don't remember doing so, and the nose looks bigger and heavier than the tail section. Interesting angle. I think I saw that car at the Monterey Historics a while back. Is it a transition between the GTO and the 250LM? I'm finding too many gaps in my Ferrari history. I guess it's time to sit down and read all those back issues of Cavallino that are piling up! T |
|
|
I checked the "Bible" AKA The Complete Ferrari by Geoffrey Eaton and it only says that the four 330 LMB models were specifically designed to compete for the Championat des Marques which was for GT cars in '62 and '63. They are sometimes referred to as 330GTs, sure to be confused with a few 4-liter GTOs (330GTO). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: enzo4re (Sep 22, 2005 9:31 am) There is no doubt that the Ferrari is a more unique, attention getting car. And if I would be content driving something 1,000 to 2,000 miles a year on the weekends, I'd probably be making a different decison. Although, I might also be inclined to go for a new 430 if I went the Ferrari route. Not to say that the 360 isn't quick and nimble enough, but it fell slightly short of the 911 S - at least in my hands. The 430 appears to be a better match of exotic styling with true supercar performance. Which coincides with why my orthopedic surgeon is selling his 360 to make room for a 430. Live by that sword, die by it, as they say. My decision has come down to the fact that I would like a high quality, low maintenance, semi-daily driver. I have an M5 that I put 16,000+ miles a year on and, if a 911 were in my garage, I'd probably split that mileage down the middle, or even slightly in favor of the 911. While in theory the 360 may be able to handle that kind of use, it's neither very practical, nor, IMO, the best use of a Ferrari. In my younger days, my first serious sports car was an original BMW M1. It was a damn resiliant car for its day and type, but trying to drive it too much took a toll on both the car and me. With all that said, I can appreciate and respect that owning and driving a Ferrari is a unique experience unmatched by Porsche and BMW. An old college friend has a pristine 328 that he bought new. And even though its performance is now exceeded by his daughter's $30k Honda S2000, he's the one that still causes traffic to stop whenever and wherever he takes it out for that occasional weekend drive. |
|
I found this shot at barchetta.cc of a Lusso in racing livery, apparently taken at a vintage racing event at LeMans>> Sure makes a pretty race car! |
|
You are here:
Forums
Coupes & Convertibles
Ferrari
Ferrari-the Ultimate classic (Ferrari Lovefest Topic)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats