Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Classic Cars Classic Cars - Archived Discussions recommend rearend for a 58' chevy pickup project 
10 messages, Last post on Jun 04, 2002 at 12:15 AM
You are in the Classic Cars - Archived Discussions Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright
This discussion is ARCHIVED. To reactivate the discussion, post a request in the Lost In The Town Hall... discussion.
|
|
|---|---|
| Your rear end ratio depends on what you want to do. If you are constantly accelerating and not doing hardly any highway, then a "low" ratio may actually improve your fuel mileage and your performance, crazy as it sounds. | |
|
|
|
Sure, I can see that--you're getting into the powerband quicker, but with minimal freeway miles you're not winding the heck out of the engine. It depends on how much torque you've got. A car with no measureable torque like a Fiat 850 needs a ratio in the 4s, and a four speed that goes from stump puller first to OD fourth. I'm just a little leery of short gears. My MGB had 3.90s (I think, no OD) and it was so unhappy on the freeway I was a moving chicane--even traffic in the slow lane was cutting me off. And that was such a sweet torquey engine I think it could have pulled a 3.55 just fine and been a lot happier on the freeway. Your average Detroit V8 (even the "peaky" ones with peak torque at 3600 rpm) doesn't need help pulling away from a stop sign. I had a '62 Impala SS with a fairly hot 327 (Holley, Edelbrock, headers and some kind of solid lifter cam). Not a great torque-to-weight ratio so the guy I bought it from thought it needed 4.11s. Wrong. Way too much shifting around town, way to much noise and vibration on the freeway. Freeway driving isn't much fun when the engine sounds like it's tearing itself apart at 60 mph. Anyway, with the drivetrain in this '58 Chevy--torquey FI 305 and OD automatic--something like a 3.08 would be fine (and cheap, since everyone wants at least 3.55s). It's a little-known fact that early Mustang V8s came with 2.80s and 3.0s and they're still pretty quick. Something around 3.0 is a good all purpose ratio providing you've got good torque. |
|
|
Thanks for the info. Well now how about the suspension? Any insite to keeping the original rear leaf springs, removing a few, replacing the bushings on the mounts. New mounts and leafs. Four bolt with coil overs. vette rear with coil overs. But with the four bolt or vette rear could I still haul something couple hundred pounds if I had to? |
|
|
|
| Beats the heck out of me. Personally I wouldn't put much money in the project so I'd stay with leaf springs. IIRC you can rebuild them (re-arch, add leaves, shim) and that's all I'd do. Taking leaves out will soften the ride, adding leaves will handle the extra power better but make the rear end even more skittish than it probably already is. Maybe a spring rebuilder can build springs that're more progressive than the stock leaves. I don't think I'd use solid bushings for your application because of their effect on ride quality. | |
|
try here they can custom make a unit to fit the truck. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Classic Cars Classic Cars - Archived Discussions recommend rearend for a 58' chevy pickup project
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
