16087 messages,
Last post on May 09, 2013 at 9:32 AM
You are in the
Sedans Forum.
What is this discussion about?
BMW 3 Series, Infiniti G37, Acura TL, Lexus IS 350, Mercedes-Benz C-Class, Cadillac CTS, Volvo S60, Audi A4, Acura TSX, Car Comparisons, Sedan
#3663 of 16087 Re: Why people buy BMWs [cdnpinhead]
by shipo
Jun 16, 2005 (8:24 pm)
Your comments echo my own feelings of seven years ago. Back then I was a happy 1995 VR6 Passat GLX 5-Speed driver and was looking forward to getting a 1999 Passat with the same basic features as my 1995 plus a couple of extra goodies like power memory seats, climate control and automatic wipers. As fortune would have it, the 1998 Passat GLX was equipped exactly as I wanted my next car to be equipped, then came the 1999 model year. Bzzzt! I'm sorry, that is incorrect! Why? VW in their infinite wisdom discontinued the 5-Speed manual for that model year, and that model year only. Why? Beats the willies out of me.
As I refused to yield on my combination of a manual transmission and at the very least the power seats (I was valet parking two to three times a week at that time and YIKES can a parking valet screw up a perfectly positioned manual seat), and climate control (I hate fiddling with the controls every time the sun goes behind a cloud in the summer time). So, with the above in mind, that left the following cars:
- Infiniti I30/Nissan Maxima twins (ugly and mushy suspensions compared to my Passat)
- Audi A4 (too small in the back seat area -- two kids in car seats you know)
- Saab 9-3 (local dealer refused to order me one with a 5-Speed)
- Volvo S70 (same dealer as the Saab, and the same attitude regarding the 5-Speed)
- BMW 528i (too slow, couldn't afford the 540i, and ewwww, that BMW stigma)
- BMW 328i (a little smaller inside than the 1999 Passat but otherwise just about perfect excepting of course for that same BMW stigma)
With all of that said, once I drove the 328i, I was hooked. Nuthin' and I do mean NUTHIN' even came close, so, stigma be damned. I've been driving BMWs ever since.
Best Regards,
Shipo
#3664 of 16087 Edmunds Comparo..
by merc1
Jun 16, 2005 (11:05 pm)
Ok now Edmunds has done it. Why in the world would they compare a A4 2.0t to a 330i? Totally ridiculous. Of course the 330i would win that contest quite easily.
M
#3665 of 16087 Re: Why people buy BMWs [cdnpinhead]
by blueguydotcom
Jun 16, 2005 (11:20 pm)
Those who own one because "it's a BMW" drive me to distraction.
They drive me bonkers. A girl at a party came up to me and said, "I have a bmw too." I asked what model. She blinked. blinked again. "It's a bmw. the little one."
Ah, yes, the typical Southern California BMW owner.
My peers...golly, how lucky I am.
It could be worse, I could own a Hummer.
#3666 of 16087 Re: Edmunds Comparo.. [merc1]
by blueguydotcom
Jun 16, 2005 (11:28 pm)
Ok now Edmunds has done it. Why in the world would they compare a A4 2.0t to a 330i? Totally ridiculous. Of course the 330i would win that contest quite easily.
Did you actually read the article? They clearly state that Audi sent them the the sportiest A4 made; Audi doesn't make a manual A4 with the V6. Audi knew going in that their top A4 in performance wasn't the V6 model. kinda sad when you think about it. Their A3 wih a DSG is a better performing car.
BTW, what the blazes is wrong with Edmunds test drivers? Everybody and their mother is getting low 6s for the A3 DSG. Edmunds gets close to 7 seconds?! Then they get a 6.6 with a 330i? The car's far more powerful than my old school e46 with performance package (I've driven e90s and they're better in every way) - a car that scampered to 60 in under 6 seconds. something's totally off with their testing.
#3667 of 16087 Re: Edmunds Comparo.. [blueguydotcom]
by merc1
Jun 16, 2005 (11:45 pm)
Yeah I read it, they should have just compared both 6-cylinders with automatics or probably not at all. Doesn't make any sense to me. A turbo 4 vs the industry standard I6? No way. Either way Audi dropping the manual/V6 combo is a mistake if Mercedes can offer a manual in the C350.
M
#3669 of 16087 Re: Oh yeah [dhanley]
by fedlawman
Jun 17, 2005 (5:21 am)
Are you going to drop an m3 engine in there, fed?
After spending the whole day yesterday driving it, I think a JC chip will be enough for me. Next to my Miata, this is the best performing car I've ever owned, and a thrill to drive - just the way it is.
#3670 of 16087 Re: Edmunds Comparo.. [blueguydotcom]
by bmw3434
Jun 17, 2005 (6:54 am)
Believe it or not ...
The E46 with a performance package and manual transmission could go 0-60 in 5.9 sec. The 0-60 time of an E90 with a manual transmission can hit 6.1 sec.
Weird...
#3671 of 16087 Re: Edmunds Comparo.. [bmw3434]
by blueguydotcom
Jun 17, 2005 (8:09 am)
Believe it or not ...
The E46 with a performance package and manual transmission could go 0-60 in 5.9 sec. The 0-60 time of an E90 with a manual transmission can hit 6.1 sec.
Weird...
I don't believe it. Not for a second.
#3672 of 16087 Re: Why people buy BMWs [shipo]
by odessit
Jun 17, 2005 (8:23 am)
Can someone explain what’s wrong with BMW stigma? What’s wrong with loving the car simply because it bears some specific name? Look, I understand if you drive bmw and do not even know what model is that you are driving, like the girl in blueguydotcom’s example – those people simply do not deserve to drive this great vehicle. On a contrary I know my car in and out, I understand exactly what I am driving. But at the same time, when I decided that I am buying a new car I had no doubt about the make. And the thing “because it is bmw” was my main reason. Simply because I always liked this car. I always wanted this car. I always respected this car and even people who are driving this car simply because for me bmw is a symbol. Symbol of something positive. Symbol of me achieved something for just 13 years living in USA. Something that I would never be able to achieve in my native country doing things legally. I hope you understand what I am trying to say.
So, what’s wrong with loving BMW just because it is BMW?
mike