You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Mercedes-Benz SL/SLK-Class Mercedes-Benz SL and SLK (all models)

Mercedes-Benz SL and SLK (all models)

766 messages,  Last post on Oct 26, 2009 at 3:12 AM

You are in the Mercedes-Benz SL/SLK-Class Forum. Your Host is claires

What is this discussion about? Mercedes-Benz SL-Class, Convertible

Messages Page 57 of 77 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 77 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#560 of 766 Correction by mpyles1 Mar 10, 2004 (1:28 pm)
My black car was an SL500, not an SL55. I can only wish I had owned two of them.
#561 of 766 by merc1 Mar 10, 2004 (9:54 pm)
Hmmmmmm are were talking about the used to be Loeber, now James Fletcher's Mercedes-Benz of Chicago????   M
#562 of 766 Loeber by mpyles1 Mar 11, 2004 (6:56 am)
Yep . . . I bought both my SL's from Fletcher-Jones (aka Mercedes-Benz of Chicago). I've been seeing license plate frames with "Loeber Motors" on them and wondered who they were, since I couldn't find them in the phone book. I've only been in Chicago about a year.   If you know Chicago dealers, you might find this interesting. The SL55 I test drove last week was at the Westmont dealership. They had two Maybach's sitting on the lot -- first ones I'd seen. It turned out they are both going to the same customer as part of an order he placed for five. One is for his Chicago home, one for his home in Florida, and one for each of his three sons.   Mercedes reportedly waived their rule of one-Maybach-per-customer because the purchaser is the single biggest private purchaser of Mercedes in the U.S. I've been told he will even buy cars solely for his kids to take on long test drives. (That would certainly explain the surfeit of big-ticket low-mileage new/used cars the area Merc dealers have.)
#563 of 766 The Waiting Game by mpyles1 Mar 11, 2004 (11:03 am)
I just found the "Automobile" article on Timothy Ferris' multi-year attempt to buy a new SL55. It's a depressingly familiar story. But it also ends by making the point why one should never buy one of these cars with mileage on them unless one doesn't care how they are broken in. After a 2-year wait, Ferris could no longer curb his enthusiasm. He met the car at the pier at 11pm one night and, climbing into it, the first thing he did was floor the accelerator and bounce the tach needle off the pins on the first three upshifts -- despite a very prominent sticker in the windshield saying to limit revs to 4500, limit top speed to 85mph, and avoid transmission kickdowns for the first 1000 miles. Maybe the factory is just bluffing . . . but I don't want someone else betting my money on it. I hope when the white smoke from his tires clears he's not finding blue smoke from his brand new oil burner.
#564 of 766 mpyles1 by merc1 Mar 12, 2004 (1:21 pm)
Ok thats what I thought. I actually got a chance to meet George Loeber back in the 90's. Nice older guy, the calculationg business type. That dealership had been in their family since the 1930s. He has a brother that still (I think) owns their other store in Lincolnwood IL, north of the city on the Edens expressway, also Loeber Motors. This was the dealership I first got to see Mercedes' at when I was in high school, somewhat of a while ago.   The dealership in Westmont - Laurel Motors is one the largest volume Mercedes dealers in the country, so that Maybach situation makes sense. Holy checkwriting...five Maybachs!!!! Gee moe netty.   The area on and around Ogden ave in which all these dealerships and private lots have so many Mercedes' and other high-end cars for sale is amazing.   M
#565 of 766 by merc1 Mar 16, 2004 (4:54 am)
On a different note...I'm really impressed with the new SLK.   From it's 268hp V6, 6/7 speed trannies, mini-SLR styling, and the much better looking and higher quality interior, it seems Mercedes really put some effort into this car.   The interior alone is a night and day difference from the old car.   What y'all think?   M Replies to this message: dwcolt (Apr 27, 2004 1:10 pm)
#566 of 766 New SLK by ed_scott0013 Mar 16, 2004 (9:48 am)
I wasn't a fan of the new nose when I first saw it, but it's started to grow on me. It seems like one of those things that looks better and better the more you see it.
#567 of 766 by sphinx99 Mar 16, 2004 (8:48 pm)
I think it looks great. Compact and athletic, which is what a performance roadster should be. I'm interested in what the resale value for the first two years' of SLKs will be like now, as the new SLK trickles into the market. 3000GT Spyders never were plentiful enough to offer much of a choice among lower-cost used hardtop convertibles, but the SLK is a higher volume offering whose first year models are just starting to move into old age.
#568 of 766 The SL/SLK is underpowered and slow. by sphinx99 Mar 17, 2004 (4:32 pm)
Get this instead.
#569 of 766 by hgiles Mar 17, 2004 (6:34 pm)
I absolutely love the new SLK. With the sports suspension, 6 speed manual and 3.5 L V6 , I am hoping it will be a worthy comptetitor to the Boxster and Z4. If Mercedes can deliver on the performance potential then they will sell a lot of cars to people like me who would never have considered them otherwise.

Messages Page 57 of 77 1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 77 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Coupes & Convertibles Mercedes-Benz SL/SLK-Class Mercedes-Benz SL and SLK (all models)