Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Smart Shopper Questions About Auto Insurance & Accidents
4417 messages, Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 10:55 AM
You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 07, 2008 2:53 pm) Isn't that a misquote of some lines in Shakepear where the discussion Involves the way to control a population of people? I thought the actual quote was something along the lines of if you want to take over a country you first kill the lawyers because they would prevent you from obtaining power by legal means. Thus the quote used to bash lawyers was actually in praise of them. Am I wrong? Maybe some of you folks with more "book learnin" than me can answer that. 
|
|
|
Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Dec 07, 2008 4:54 pm) No, I think that is a myth fabricated by lawyers.  Here's some interesting analysis: The Ethical Spectacle. tidester, host SUVs and Smart Shopper
|
|
|
Replying to: tidester (Dec 07, 2008 11:40 pm)  I don't see anything about the Bard and insurance. Steve, visiting host (and almost an English major)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Dec 08, 2008 12:14 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 08, 2008 9:13 am) Did he get his Liability coverage canceled on his horse drawn buckboard?
|
|
|
how ANYONE could mention "auto insurance" and not, in the same breath, utter the word "lawyer"...it's like macaroni and cheese, Lewis & Clark, Cain & Abel, Abercrombie & Fitch, Batman & Robin, you get the idea... So, any mention of lawyer is ALWAYS on topic in the Auto Insurance topic...
|
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 08, 2008 2:58 pm) |
|
| I have no choice but to agree...but, if everyone actually did everything right, there would not be the need for courts, as there would be no disputes to resolve...it is an imperfect world we live in... | |
|
|
|
Replying to: euphonium (Dec 08, 2008 10:19 am) What he meant I believe is that the actuarial "tables" are such that the insurance company can never lose. Or perhaps he meant the same thing as I often tell people, that if you "win" against an insurance company they don't hang their heads, and if you "lose" they don't pump their fists in victory. To an insurance company, it is all totally impersonal. It's about bottom line at the end of the year--did we take in more than we paid out? Much like a casino, in fact. Insurance would be a GREAT idea in principle if it didn't end up punishing the victim half the time.
|
|
|
Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Dec 09, 2008 9:07 am) Without profit and investment income, honest & true claims could not be paid. The purpose of insurance is to prevent a financial catastrophe and not be a maintence policy like a case of the sniffles is to medical insurance. Victims are not punished, but made whole without raking in an undeserved profit. The only "gamble" in the insurance industry is when you buy Retroactive Liability.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Smart Shopper Questions About Auto Insurance & Accidents
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
