Sign In Join 



Questions About Auto Insurance & Accidents

4421 messages,  Last post on Dec 04, 2009 at 1:26 PM

You are in the Smart Shopper Forum. Your Hosts are kirstie_h & tidester

What is this discussion about? Buying Insurance


Messages Page 416 of 443
1
...
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
...
443
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4144 of 4421
Re: help need help with auto accident [jimmydc2] by lilyowen
Nov 28, 2008 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: jimmydc2 (Nov 20, 2008 11:16 pm)

I know I'm late in the game, but I'd like to put my C-note on your carrier paying for the damages to the other party, and you hearing nothing more of this.
 
Now, there are states that have enacted "pay to play" laws that would in some twisted reality make you not liable for rear-ending another party when they have no insurance; however, even these laws do not make the uninsured party liable, they simply prohibit them from collecting from the negligent party (in this case: you).
 
I'm all for people having insurance ... in fact, I'm all for impounding vehicles of people that do not have insurance. But the simple lack of insurance has no bearing whatsoever on your negligence while following too closely. My money is on your carrier paying and you getting dinged with an at fault accident.
#4145 of 4421
If I have the facts by marsha7
Nov 28, 2008 (2:02 pm)
Reply
straight, a poster (Driver #1) rear-ended another driver (Driver #2), and the rear-ended driver (Driver #2) was uninsured...so, Driver #1 thinks they are not at fault because the driver they struck had no insurance???...if my facts are correct, the post is beyond ridiculous...unless they cut you off, rearending someone will virtually ALWAYS place you at fault for causing the wreck, plain and simple...
 
What usually happens, here in GA anyway, is that Driver #2 is also cited for failure to have insurance, which carries a fine here of $200-$1000...but that in no way changes fault in the wreck...
 
That uninsured driver has every right to have their car fixed by the poster's insurance, and collect damages for any injuries suffered...
 
In fact, aside from being cited for no insurance, the entire process should proceed as tho nobody knew they were uninsured...just because I have no insurance takes away NONE of my rights if you rear-end me...I have simply committed an infraction that causes me to pay a fine, but my rights against your negligence are unchanged, and, regardless of my insurance or not, you ARE at fault for my damages...
 
Now, if I had struck you, everything would change, but that is not the the situation, if I understand correctly...
 
I am amused at what folks will do to relieve themselves of their own carelessness...
#4146 of 4421
Re: If I have the facts [marsha7] by houdini1
Nov 30, 2008 (11:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Nov 28, 2008 2:02 pm)

I agree with everything you say...if those were the facts and the intent. But as I recall, the person who was rear ended had no injuries and no damage to his car so I don't think our original poster was trying to shirk his responsibility. He was merely trying to figure out how to get his own damage repaired in the least costly manner. At least that was my understanding.
 
#4147 of 4421
Re: If I have the facts [marsha7] by paisan
Nov 30, 2008 (6:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Nov 28, 2008 2:02 pm)

In some states no insurance or dwi or a few other offenses actually does make that person wrong, no matter ho would be in the wrong if they were not committing such infactions.
 
-mike
Subaru Guru and Track Instructor
#4148 of 4421
That does not by marsha7
Dec 01, 2008 (8:40 am)
Reply
make sense...my failure to have insurance as the lead car does not alter your responsibility for rear-ending me...my lack of insurance in no way caused your negligence in failing to stop before striking my rear...that, to me, is common sense, but we all know that some state's laws have no common sense...
 
After all, their laws are usually written by...........................LAWYERS!!!!!
 
#4149 of 4421
Re: That does not [marsha7] by jwilliams2
Dec 01, 2008 (8:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 01, 2008 8:40 am)

Wait a minute.....what about the "non-insured tractor beam" that sucks you into the non-insured car?
#4150 of 4421
jwilliams by marsha7
Dec 01, 2008 (10:49 am)
Reply
Only a fool would beleive in a "non-insured tractor beam"...I cannot believe the silliness expressed by this poster...
 
Now, if you will excuse me, I will beam myself up to the courthouse where I will confer in high legal terms, incomprehensible to a layman like you, with Kirk, Spock, Picard and Data...
 
I will leave you now, at Warp Factor 7, as I have run seriously low on our supply of Di-Lithium Crystals...
#4151 of 4421
Re: jwilliams [marsha7] by steve_ HOST
Dec 01, 2008 (11:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 01, 2008 10:49 am)

If you drive around without insurance, couldn't the state say you can't avail yourself of the court system, so that you couldn't sue the at fault driver even though he smashed into your car? I guess the public policy implications of that are too big, but it would sure encourage more people to get car insurance.
 
Steve, just a visiting host
#4152 of 4421
Re: If I have the facts [marsha7] by euphonium
Dec 01, 2008 (11:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Nov 28, 2008 2:02 pm)

The uninsured was advised by the at fault driver that he, the at fault driver, would not report the crash to the state if the uninsured paid for the damages to the at fault driver's car. The purpose was to help the uninsured keep his driving PRIVILEGE from being taken away by the state's Financial Responsibility Law which states, "Thou shall not be INVOLVED in a crash without insurance."
 
Determination of Fault, otherwise, is not the issue. It is not extortion either. It IS an opportunity for the uninsured to keep his license for the PRIVILEGE not deserved by being uninsured.
#4153 of 4421
euphonium by marsha7
Dec 01, 2008 (12:46 pm)
Reply
Please understand, I am NOT justifying driving w/o insurance...I think the uninsured driver should be "hanged from the neck until dead" (as they say in the old westerns with a hanging judge, not to be confused with a hanging chad)...anyone driving w/o insurance should be fined the maximum, in the hopes that they will NEVER consider doing that again...plus, as a plug, that is why all those who DO have insurance, always have U/M coverage, in case you ARE struck by the idiot who is uninsured...

Messages Page 416 of 443
1
...
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
...
443
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement