Sign In Join 



Ford Freestyle - Taurus X

7456 messages,  Last post on Nov 14, 2009 at 7:03 PM

You are in the Ford Freestyle Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Ford Freestyle, Ford Taurus X, SUV


Messages Page 728 of 746
1
...
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
...
746
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#7271 of 7456
Re: Is the Taurus X dying? [larryqw] by coolmazda5
Feb 22, 2008 (1:36 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larryqw (Feb 22, 2008 12:49 pm)

Well, that is why I posted earlier here. I don't own a Freestyle/Taurus X but I own 2 Mazda5s (yes, they sell so few I needed to get 2 )...
 
But now, with both cars (Freestyle and Mazda5), although different, I finally started to see automakers in NA (not in Europe or Australasia, these type of cars are popular there) moving away from the typical and humongous minivans and SUVs to target the family markets.
 
Now some sources say that the Taurus X will be replaced by the EDGE and/or the Boxy FLEX. It is like saying the the Mazda6 wagon or the Mazda MPV are going to be replaced by the CX-7 or CX-9 (gas guzzlers, not too much useful space, fancy but pure and tall SUVs)
 
Oh well, as said earlier, Freestyles are very popular in my area and I don't like that Ford move.
#7272 of 7456
Re: Is the Taurus X dying? [coolmazda5] by coolmazda5
Feb 22, 2008 (10:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: coolmazda5 (Feb 22, 2008 1:36 pm)

When I mentioned Australasia, this is what comes to mind. I like the front grille and headlights and the fact that it is more like a wagon (I would just don't like it that tall).
 
Does the car look familiar?
 
#7273 of 7456
Territory has similar styling by mschmal
Mar 01, 2008 (7:09 am)
Reply
but it is based on a Rear Drive platform.
 
The Taurus X is being discountinued because the Flex is a far more advanced vehicle.
 
Taurus X/Freestyle a first attempt at a station wagon that didn't look so much like a station wagon.
 
Originally the Flex was suppose to be built on the Fusion platform and have sliding doors like a mini van.
 
Mark
#7274 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [mschmal] by humblecoder
Mar 01, 2008 (3:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mschmal (Mar 01, 2008 7:09 am)

The Taurus X is being discountinued because the Flex is a far more advanced vehicle.
 
Care to explain? Looks like the Flex is going to use the same platform, same engine, and same transmission as the TX, so how is it "far more advanced"?
#7275 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [humblecoder] by bobw3
Mar 01, 2008 (3:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: humblecoder (Mar 01, 2008 3:10 pm)

It has 4" more 2nd row legroom.
#7276 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [mschmal] by raezmom3
Mar 01, 2008 (7:47 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mschmal (Mar 01, 2008 7:09 am)

I had a question about the discontinuation of the Taurus X. Where can I find that info and is it reliable? I have asked Ford and Ford dealers about this and they both denied it.
#7277 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [raezmom3] by passat_2002
Mar 01, 2008 (9:38 pm)
Reply

Replying to: raezmom3 (Mar 01, 2008 7:47 pm)

It is rumored that the X will be discontinued after the 2009 model year. But it is rumor only. It doesn't change the fact that it's a very fine vehicle. It's just that the Flex will likely take it's place in the Ford lineup after 2009.
#7278 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [raezmom3] by larryqw
Mar 02, 2008 (1:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: raezmom3 (Mar 01, 2008 7:47 pm)

No official word at all about the fate of the Taurus X. It's more the absence of word. When you hear all the official talk about the terrific new Taurus sedan design coming, you hear nothing about a new Taurus X design in the works.
 
Also, the sales numbers are miserable, only around 3000 per month, which is hard to understand for a car with everything going for it. It could just be the "wagon" look doesn't sell to many. It also doesn't help, and a sign, that Ford is not putting any advertising into the Taurus X, neglecting it like an unloved child. There is rumor that the Taurus X will be replaced by the already announced redesigned unibody Explorer coming in a year or two, which indeed looks much like the Taurus X. And the new Flex coming this summer is nearly identical in features and size on the same platform.
 
 I suspect Ford's not making any final decision on the Taurus X until they see how the radical new Flex design pans out, or the new Explorer is available in late 2009. Some people like me are turned off by the Flex's boxy looks. That's indeed why I just bought me a Taurus X Limited a few weeks ago. (BTW, it's a great car!) It could be Ford wants to leave their options open for now, or until they have a clear replacement.
 
This is all speculation by many. But it's clear the Taurus X isn't selling, not being supported by Ford, and being squeezed out of the fleet by the similar Flex and new Explorer coming over the next months and years.
#7279 of 7456
Re: Territory has similar styling [larryqw] by raezmom3
Mar 02, 2008 (3:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: larryqw (Mar 02, 2008 1:25 am)

I am overseas and have not even looked at this vehicle yet. I am going to buy this car by ratings and good reviews alone. I really like the concept of this car and I like that it is different. I live in Japan and their are similar cars like the Taurus X everywhere. I just don't know why Ford is giving up. I noticed that Ford was not advertising this car and started to research why. But it makes sense now!
 
I have a question for you larryqw. Did you get the 6 pass or the 7 pass? I wanted to order the limited 7 pass with ultimate pkg but Ford no longer will make those. They will only make the 6 pass with ultimate pkg. Do you know why? Is it a safety issue?
#7280 of 7456
Taurus Configuration [raezmom3] by larryqw
Mar 02, 2008 (10:06 am)
Reply

Replying to: raezmom3 (Mar 02, 2008 3:48 am)

I got the Taurus X with six passenger seating. I was originally thinking of the 7 passenger version when my little girl was still in a baby seat, so I could put her in the middle of the second row and allow five people to get in without going to the third row. But then she just got big enough (at 6 years old) to go to a booster, which is very easy to move around and use any belt.
 Oddly, my two youngest girls (6 and 13) love the third row most of all, even though my 13 yo is 5'10" tall. I think it's because of the command seating that puts them up high with a great view. And it's fun like being in the back of the bus..
  Accessing the third row is extremely easy with the nicely folding second row seats that make a very wide access to the third row. I can easily kneel in and help the 6yo to buckle her belt with out any strain.
  If I had a fixed baby seat in the six passenger version, I'd put it in the second row passenger side so I could see the little critter and hand off stuff while driving. And with the command seating, even that row is higher up for visibility outside. It's still very easy to get in and out of the third row by folding the second row on the driver's side. But if there's traffic, the kids still can go out the passenger side without folding the second row baby seat by just climbing over the second row console and going around. (Kids are like monkeys and the car is big - no problem for them, especially the smaller ones in back.) Actually, after using it, I think the six passenger configuration is very flexible and allows much easier access to everything.
 
Also, even though I got the FWD, the unused AWD tunnel goes down the center of the vehicle, so the second row console fits nicely and gives cup holders and a nice storage area, especially for DVDs, remote control, and headphones in my car with the FES. (Incidentally, the FES is way more than just a DVD player, its another CD player and a multimedia system for audio as well. You and the kids can be listening to three different things at once.)
 
The drive tunnel is unfortunate in the FWD, as you still give up space. Also you pay for it in ground clearance. When crawling under the Taurus X to install a 2" hitch for my bikes, I measured the ground clearance. It's 8 or 9 inches most everywhere, except the exhaust system that drops to just around 7 inches, with a lowest point just under the engine (Ford lists it as only 5.1", possible with full load and bouncing maybe.) It annoys me the exhaust is just below an big open hole available for the rear drive train I don't have, yet reducing the clearance.
 
I don't work for Ford and have no clue why they discontinued the 7 passenger model (or that they did) for the Limited. It could be lack of demand. Unless you really need to sit 7 people, the 6 passenger version is very flexible, has more storage, and a much nicer feel.
 
If you haven't driven the Taurus X, one surprise for me was the large size. I looked at the pictures and kept imagining something a little bigger than my Sable wagon . Even test driving it at the dealer with the big trucks on the lot didn't prepare me for how big it really was. When I got home and parked it next to my Sable wagon and wife's Freestar minivan, it dwarfs my Sable wagon and makes it's tires look like a toy wagon's. Overall, the Taurus X is the height and length of my wife's minivan, which is surprising from the pictures. It's got quite a bit of room.

Messages Page 728 of 746
1
...
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
...
746
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement