- #7160 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [vicenac]
by makenasdad
-
Aug 28, 2007 (12:25 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: vicenac (Aug 23, 2007 12:21 pm)
I've had an X for about two weeks now and am very happy. I can only compare it to the Freestyles that I rented via Avis (which I liked but didn't love). The new X is a significant upgrade in nearly every way with two exceptions: gas mileage and exterior color options. By this I refer to the fact that the paint color and clading are two-tone (by design) while I'd prefer a single matching color. Others may prefer the two tone. The gas mileage is a by-product of a much more powerful engine, which I love. My biggest beef with the Freestyle was the power and acceleration which I found lacking. The new engine makes this a strength of the car instead of a liability. In addition, somehow the ride is quieter than the Freestyles I've driven. All the other benefits of the old Freestyle remain, including the super quick and easy configuration of the seating and the stability you like. As to the long term quality and dealer questions it is too soon for me to say, but the initial build quality is pretty good (but not excellent) and certainly does not effect my overall impression negatively. I also upgraded to leather and the DVD package which forced me to get some other convenience features like dual zone AC. I've been very impressed with the DVD system which is better than the one in my Lexus (though two years newer). Ford has a real winner here which is why I am so confused that they have not seen fit to promote it yet.
|
- #7161 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [makenasdad]
by bobw3
-
Aug 28, 2007 (1:00 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: makenasdad (Aug 28, 2007 12:25 pm)
What did you pay and what is your MPG?
|
- #7162 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [bobw3]
by jigmaster
-
Aug 29, 2007 (12:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Aug 28, 2007 1:00 pm)
I am getting 26MGP with 70% highway and 30% city driving (according to car computer ) so far before engine break in which I consider pretty good. I will test real MPG when I will take my family for longer trip.
|
- #7163 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [jigmaster]
by passat_2002
-
Aug 29, 2007 (12:58 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jigmaster (Aug 29, 2007 12:08 pm)
I assume we're talking a FWD X, correct jigmaster? If you're getting that good of mileage before the 3.5L is even broken in, then you have not given up anything to the Freestyle. You may actually be getting better mileage.
|
- #7164 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [passat_2002]
by jigmaster
-
Aug 29, 2007 (2:28 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: passat_2002 (Aug 29, 2007 12:58 pm)
Yes, I have FWD TX. But keep in mind I drive very carefuly with very light foot;). But I must admit I am nicely surprised as well ( unless computer is a freaking lying  )
|
- #7165 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [bobw3]
by makenasdad
-
Sep 03, 2007 (6:10 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Aug 28, 2007 1:00 pm)
Mine is a company car, so I can't say I paid attention to the price. My MPG has been 16.4 according to the on board computer. This is almost all city driving and is better than I estimated from my first tank (before I discovered the on board computer).
|
- #7166 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [makenasdad]
by jigmaster
-
Sep 04, 2007 (4:09 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: makenasdad (Sep 03, 2007 6:10 pm)
Yeah, MPG drops significantly in the city:(. I had to do some shopping during the weekend so we did some driving through local shops in the city for two days and it was around 18.5MPG for the weekend acording to car computer.
|
- #7167 of 7456
-
Re: why was the engine and CVT replaced? [makenasdad]
by bruneau1
-
Sep 06, 2007 (10:57 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: makenasdad (Aug 28, 2007 12:25 pm)
Today I compared my Freestyle to the new Taurus X. I like the new decoration inside and out, and the engine is more powerful, of course. While the CVT is not as peppy off-the-line, it is smoother and less intrusive than the new 6-spd. The steering and brakes are better in my Freestyle. So at this point, I wouldn't change and don't feel deprived.
|
- #7168 of 7456
-
New Taurus X Post-Freestyle
by flufflebug
-
Sep 08, 2007 (4:25 pm)
-
|
Have had new Taurus X now for about 2 weeks. Turned in 05 Freestyle lease after 2 years. I was afraid I would be disappointed going to the Taurus X after having the Freestyle, but I am very pleased with the Taurus X. I really only miss the CVT when I am in the parking garage at work. I thought I would notice not having it more. The Taurus X is pretty much the same as the Freestyle with some minor improvements. I like the 2 tone interior and the chrome accents. The DVD screen does not block the rear-view anymore. I can see out the back window without any problem. The doors automatically unlock now when the driver's door is opened (yeah!- it's the little things). The hatch is much easier to close. The biggest disappointment is the mileage,not surprisingly. I went from an AWD getting 16/22 (never got the high mileage everybody else reported) to FWD. Today I got 22.6mpg on the highway. Mixed driving I've been getting between 18 and 19 mpg. Other than that, I give the Taurus X a big thumbs up. We were very pleased with the Freestyle we had too. We considered buying it but felt we'd lose money with the money we had already put into leasing, not to mention not having much as warranty.
For those interested paid $30198 (Z-plan price plus $1000 rebate, including tax) for lt ice blue FWD Limited with DVD system, auxillary heat and Triptunes(for IPOD).
|
- #7169 of 7456
-
Re: New Taurus X Post-Freestyle [flufflebug]
by jigmaster
-
Sep 10, 2007 (5:07 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: flufflebug (Sep 08, 2007 4:25 pm)
I must admit I made mistake converting MPG from metric system. It is 24mpg not 26mpg. Sorry for misinformation 
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs 
