You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)

14395 messages, Last post on Nov 30, 2009 at 6:19 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: steve_ (Jan 19, 2009 8:55 am) |
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Jan 19, 2009 8:55 am) |
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 19, 2009 8:52 am) Maybe a plot for a b movie with a 2009 version of Charles Bronson, with a jammer driving around and breaking up calls. But, could that be more dangerous in that the cell phone driver would then get upset and try to redial and would fumble around. The ultimate Bronson jammer would, of course, fry the cell phone. |
|
|
Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 19, 2009 8:52 am) Upscale opera houses and symphony halls have powerful jammers that can cease all cell phones in the auditorium. Personal jammers for use in quiet restaurants are available for less than $300. I don't know if their radius of effectiveness will reach into adjacent vehicles, but they would be handy while riding the bus or commuter train.
|
|
|
|
|
While on a divided 4 lane road (not a highway) I noticed in my rear view mirror that someone was behind another car in the left lane flashing their brights (as this car had fallen behind the group of cars that I was behind. Funny thing was that there was no one in the right lane blocking her from passing. Eventually she did pass on the right. Ok she passed on the right got back in the left lane and caught up with the rest of the pack. She got about a car length ahead of me (I was in the right lane) and was blocked. Now there was several cars in front of her but she just got behind the one car infront of her and turned on her brights.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: euphonium (Jan 19, 2009 10:46 am) Upscale opera houses and symphony halls have a lot of concrete and steel beams that block cell signals. They don't need to jam anything as you wouldn't be able to get a signal unless there is a repeater in the building.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jan 19, 2009 4:26 pm) She was probably trying to get out of a dead cell area so she could tell all her friends how she was saving the planet by driving 45 in the left lane.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Jan 19, 2009 4:48 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Jan 19, 2009 4:29 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Jan 19, 2009 4:48 pm) However, I have determined that the best lane to speed in is the one left of the right lane. But Ruking1 was so correct, that when the drivers suddenly see a CHP with or without a radar gut suddenly they all get halos and wings. Ergo, they slow and act "normally". Oh, in my time, (1960s-1980s)we did not have radar guns because the Legislators in those days did not believe we should use them. Instead we had to drive up to outrageous speeds to get behind a high speeder, and then clock their speed. After a while, many of us could just look at the car as it flew by and we could within 5-10 mph and determine their speed. Too many officers were injured and/or killed in clocking. So many times speeds at 110 mph down to about 85 I would estimate, and then cite for 75 in a 65. And if you were found to be an "expert witness", (not very had to do) you could testify to the speed in Court, and the judge would usually accept it. You learned early on that your life was worth more than driving 120-130 mph to catch up to clock some jerk at 110 mph. Several of my friends died on those freeways but that was a condition of the job we all knew when we became law enforcement. Sorry about the rambling good luck to all and stay safe. jensad |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views
Inconsiderate Drivers (share your stories, etc.)
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle


Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats