You have saved this page | See all saved pages
Dodge Neon SRT-4
528 messages, Last post on May 14, 2012 at 5:50 PM
You are in the Dodge/Plymouth Neon Forum.What is this discussion about? Dodge Neon SRT-4, Exterior, Sedan
#1 of 528 hmmmm by rezo00
Jan 15, 2002 (2:49 pm)
The SRT-4 will have a 16-valve dohc turbocharged 2.4-liter transverse-mounted four driving the front wheels with 205 hp and 220 lb ft of torque. Weighing in at an estimated 2970 pounds, the SRT-4 goes from zero to 60 in 5.9 seconds,So says autoweek.
lb/hp = 14.48
does anyone see a problem here...
#2 of 528 I don't know by mattdee1
Jan 15, 2002 (11:49 pm)
When I heard that figure, I thought it sounded a bit optimistic.I'd be more inclined to believe mid to high 6's.. but who knows? Time will tell.
#3 of 528 Another view to SRT-4 by davemurray
Jan 16, 2002 (2:15 am)
There's a controversial analysis about the SRT-4 from the site http://autozine.kyul.net/0_News/Latest/Current/News_frame.htm :
"That is all for what Chrysler press kit told me. What it did not say is how to handle the tremendous torque in the front-wheel-drive chassis. The Neon and even R/T were never renowned for handling, now putting far more power to the front wheels without the help of any limited slip differential and traction control (yes, the press release did not mention) will surely make it one of the worst hot rods to drive. Expect torque steer, wheelspin, understeer and scary moments ...
"So, go for the SVT Focus instead. European guys are more lucky, as the Focus RS will debut later this year. With 15 more horsepower and 1 lbft more torque than the Neon ...
What do you think ?
#4 of 528 pocket-rockets by freddy_k
Jan 16, 2002 (9:11 am)
An econo car with 200 hp is - still an economy car, only faster, more dangerous, and uncomfortably loud and stiff. You still get the questionable build quality and fit n finish. There are so many affordable cars to choose from that already come with a natural 200 hp, or close to it, that would be a much smarter buy to anyone except the drag racer. The Turbo is an extra maintanence expense which will need replacing eventually and wear the engine quicker.#5 of 528 by imaram
Jan 16, 2002 (9:57 am)
I don't think current turbos are the bane of the enthusiasts wallet that their predecessors were.This application only follows what "tuners" have been doing for some time already. If that package were in the current PT, the press would be going freaking nuts!
Can't agree with his handling observations on past iterations. While not stellar, handling was certainly better than mid-pack for mid-level econoboxes. A tire change was enough to raise it several notches on the scale, too, since Chrysler put such pitiable rubber on as original equipment.
Can agree though with the sentiment that unless there is some enhanced control, torque steer and understeer are unavoidable, I would think.
SVT Focus would be an admirable alternative, though not quite as attractive to my mind.
#6 of 528 by beanboy
Jan 17, 2002 (11:05 am)
"The Neon and even R/T were never renowned for handling"Hmm, better tell the folks with Neon ACRs (American Club Racer) that their cars aren't renowned for handling. The Neon, especially in first gen guise, was and is one of the best auto-x cars out there, and fine for track racing as well. Just be careful with those front wheel bearing and slicks, tehe.
The SRT-4 will have equal length driveshafts, which will ease the amount of torque steer problems.
Hmm, if the turbo does go at 80K, replace it with a better one for $600. Big deal.
freddy_k, what other new sporty car comes with 200HP or more for 20K or less?
-B
#7 of 528 handling by rezo00
Jan 17, 2002 (3:23 pm)
autocross is a joke...real roads dont look like thoes carzy mall parking lot courses...want to beat every one in an autocross? get a high powered gokart and it will kick everyones ass.#8 of 528 by cyranno99
Jan 17, 2002 (3:37 pm)
this car is built for the Neon's image... nothing else. I'd rather buy a WRX at a higher price. Both of those cars are "homely" looking.same???
beanboy "Dodge Neon SRT-4" Jan 4, 2002 7:38am
#9 of 528 by imaram
Jan 17, 2002 (3:55 pm)
Don't know why we're talking about it in here, since it's a sedan, but, hey, lose the oversized trunk-handle and the hood decoration, and I like it!cyranno: Subaru styling is definitely an acquired taste! I haven't acquired it.
#10 of 528 imaram by cyranno99
Jan 17, 2002 (4:00 pm)
not surprised .... the local dealer is advertising that there are a few WRX still on the lot... so buy one and modify the headlights!!!!To POST a message, please
Sign In.
Advertisement
Most Popular in Forums
Search Forums
Enter Keyword(s):
Learn More, Do More
Edmunds Community
Advertisement