Sign In Join 



Volvo XC90 SUV

5062 messages,  Last post on Nov 19, 2009 at 7:33 PM

You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Volvo XC90, SUV


Messages Page 504 of 507
1
...
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5022 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by qbrozen
Jul 25, 2008 (6:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 5:21 am)

Hmmmm.... well just how decent was this price?
 
I have NO idea why the mileage listed is higher. Same powertrain, similar weight. Huh. Weird. I would tend to doubt the real-world experience would show this difference.
 
Honestly, I haven't researched if the '03 had any reliability problems that were ironed out in later years. I don't remember reading of any such issues, but can't say for sure one way or another. Vmax may know better.
#5023 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [qbrozen] by peetert
Jul 25, 2008 (6:59 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jul 25, 2008 6:33 am)

the '03 is listed on their website at just under 17k miles are at 41,2. It's got a clean carfax listed as a personal vehicle (not a lease). Lthr, sunroof, 7-pass, heated seats, rev. sensors, power pass.
 
I wonder if the tires size would be a factor in the mpg. The '03 has 16" while the '05 has 17".
 
One thing I did notice was about 5-6 '05's with stickers on then noting they were not for sale yet and to see a salesman about the release date. I asked and was told they were lease returns. Wonder if these will offer better prices?
 
I'm afraid of getting beaten down by you and v-max again like I did with the T-X questioning, but I've been reaseaching the MDX's this morning and those seem like a good buy. The one's nearby are all CPO with comparable mileage to the XC90's, but listed at least 2K lower in price.
 
Decisions, Decisions
#5024 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by volvomax
Jul 25, 2008 (7:12 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 6:59 am)

The MDX is a nice car, and it has a lot of toys.
But, it can't hold a candle to the XC90 in terms of safety.
So, what's most important to you?
#5025 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by thas9469
Jul 25, 2008 (7:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 5:21 am)

Do not buy the 2003 XC90 2.5T. I had one of these - ask if the transmission has been replaced. This is one of their biggist problems. I bought mine in 2007 and within 1 year I had put over $6,000 into it, including the transmission at 75,000 miles and volvo did nothing to back it. The XC90's are junk especially the early models. If you need proof, just read through some of these blogs. I bought the vehicle for 21,000 and I traded it in for 13,000 1 year later with a new transmission because auction price is all they go by and they do not sell at auction because of all the problems. Please beware, don't get screwed as I did by the all wonderful Volvo (ha-ha). Buy another make - like Toyota - remember Volvo is owned by Ford and that is the parts that are in them, save your money - buy the Ford.
#5026 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [thas9469] by qbrozen
Jul 25, 2008 (7:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: thas9469 (Jul 25, 2008 7:20 am)

OK. We've been over this.
You DID NOT have a 2.5T!
You had a T6!
BIIIGGGGG difference!
The T6 used a GM POS tranny.
If you are going to keep chiming in with only negative things, at least have your details straight.
 
And after that comment about an assistant to the president of Volvo and now you saying you had a 2.5T rather than the T6, as you previously claimed .... well, I'll just leave the conclusions up to the reader.
#5027 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by qbrozen
Jul 25, 2008 (7:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 6:59 am)

I won't beat you down for an MDX. Not at all.
I beat you down for a Ford. ;P
 
We had a Pilot and loved it. But it really does feel like a tin can when we drove it back to back with the Volvo. I've never driven an MDX, however. I'm shocked to hear they are cheaper. But is that just a cheaper ASKING price than the volvos? Make sure you compare final purchase prices. As you've learned, Volvo dealers tend to mark up their vehicles much further than Honda/Acura dealers. Not sure of all the behind-the-scenes reasoning. Maybe Honda/Acura buyers don't dicker as much as volvo buyers, so no need to mark them up so high (?).
#5028 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [qbrozen] by peetert
Jul 25, 2008 (9:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jul 25, 2008 7:56 am)

Thanks, The MDX seemed to have a lot of Pep compared to the Volvo. The 265 hp V-6 helps.
 
They are both pretty close, that's where the issue is. I've got a good idea on the Volvo prices and the fact he might not come down as much as I'd like so for argument's sake, lets say 22,5 (what you paid for your 5 seater and what I'd be wiling to pay for this one) for an '05 AWD XC 90 7 seater w/ ver, Prem, climate w/ 29 k miles, No CPO. Figure CPO will bring that up to 23,7.
 
Here's one of my MDX choices. '05 Touring ( same options as Volvo plus w/ reverse camera, DVD, XM radio, Bluetooth), 24k miles and its a CPO (7yr,100k) listed at 24,9. Now I figure I'm probably not going to get much lower than this, but even so, its a good price. And finally, Acura has special financing on CPO MDX's (2.9% up to 60mos). Beats my preapproved rate. The salesman was going to get back to me with prices of the ones they have so we'll see if they are any better than the web.
 
The '03 is still in the back of my mind as well. VoloMax anything on the '03s I should be wary of?
 
Thanks
#5029 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by qbrozen
Jul 25, 2008 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 9:39 am)

CPO adds much more than $1200 to the volvo, BTW. As I said above, my understanding is that the extended warranty alone is over $2k. At least, that's how it is if you bought an XC90 from a non-Volvo dealer and wanted to purchase the warranty.
 
A Honda extended warranty is MUCH cheaper. We paid ~$900 for a 100k warranty on our Pilot.
#5030 of 5062
Re: The more I look, the more confused I get [peetert] by volvomax
Jul 25, 2008 (11:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: peetert (Jul 25, 2008 9:39 am)

The '03 is still in the back of my mind as well. VoloMax anything on the '03s I should be wary of?
 
As long as its a 2.5T you should be just fine.
Heck, not all the T6's were bad either.
We just sold a very nice 60k 03 T6.
#5031 of 5062
Re: [qbrozen] by willx45x
Jul 25, 2008 (2:48 pm)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Jul 25, 2008 6:20 am)

I don't think there is any question the V8 adds value - the mileage difference between the V8 and the 2.5T is insignificant and the V8 (by my research) is a far superior engine. Sounds like you got a great deal, but I believe your numbers are a little unrealistic. $25-26k is probably about on the money. $23k is a wish and a prayer.
 
w

Messages Page 504 of 507
1
...
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement