You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Mazda6
Mazda6 Sedan

17805 messages, Last post on Mar 06, 2009 at 5:47 AM
You are in the Mazda6 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
|
|---|---|
|
It is not too narrow and small for the US market. It's handily larger than a Jetta and interior-wise is the same size as a Passat and a Legacy. It's too narrow and small as a Taurus replacement, but that kind of phrase makes us sound like we only drive Cadillac Fleewoods. The Mondeo is a tad larger than the current-gen 626 and it is a great machine... there's a lot of word-to-mouth demand for this car in the US market and it could theoretically do very well. Remember when they said that the Focus would be another world car failure? The Focus and Mondeo are similar vehicles in their design, handling and market intentions (Golf and Passat competitors) . Wait and see is my belief... |
|
|
Yeah, but Ford buyers are different than VW and Subaru buyers. They expect more space, bigger cars. IMO the reason the Contour failed was its tight interior quarters. That plus they watered down the handling, so it wasn't the small, sporty sedan that was popular in Europe. Focus is an excellent counterpoint, but check out the inside - it's roomy for its class, probably more roomy than the bigger Contour was. -juice |
|
|
|
|
Mondeo is as large or larger than Passat. Larger than Galant, and others. If sold as a Sable, it doesnt need to be the size people expect of a Taurus. My wife wants a car sized between a Taurus (too big for her and her daily commute, she wants something smaller and lighter...more nimble) and the Prizm she is driving now. The Saturn L is the perfect size for her. I also see a Passat and Stratus as the right size for her. I really want the Saturn for her, but I'm hedging on the price. But the size is right. In fact, also for her the Contour would be perfect even if the beck seat is not long enough. Remember guys, its not always length...its the width that matters...........................................and the Contour seems to be close to ok in the width dept. So anyways, if the Mondeo/ Sable is equal to the Passat and Saturn L in interior space......and its most likely larger, than the size of it is fine. The new Mazda 6 looks to be a perfect size also. |
|
|
|
|
a lot of domestic cars are fat....... i.e. the car may be wider and larger but may not have as much interior space. GM cars in particular chew up a lot of length and width but then return it in feeble interior space for their girth.....(Bonneville, Aurora, Regal....on and on). |
|
|
"Remember guys, its not always length...its the width that matters" We're talking about cars, right? *teehee* |
|
|
Mazda is gonna call it the 5 1/2? |
|
|
|
| The Ford Contour's twin was the Mercury Mystique - the Mercury Sable is a twin of the Ford Taurus (both butt-ugly and oversized cars, IMHO, but with a decent powerplant!) | |
| ateixeira: I am not quite sure where you get the idea that the Contour's handling was watered down for the North American market. The SE's handling was considered by many as better then most other 4 door American sedans while the SVT was often described as the poor man's BMW. The editors here at Edmunds stated "the Contour SE handles better than many sport coupes" while the SVT "was as perfect as anyone could expect for a sports sedan stickering under $23,000". In fact, I can't remember ever hearing a bad review when it came to the Contour's handling. | |
|
|
| Its steering was basically unchanged, but the chassis was softer. | |
|
I test drove an SE V6, and it was OK, nothing special, IMHO. I've rented 4 bangers and they weren't as good. Most were rentals and fleet cars, remember. Even the SVT was "fixed" after the first year, with some fine tuning that made it a lot better, IIRC. -juice |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Mazda MAZDA6



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats