You are here: Forums Sedans Audi A4 Audi A4 Convertible

Audi A4 Convertible

229 messages,  Last post on Nov 16, 2009 at 8:30 PM

You are in the Audi A4 Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Audi Cabriolet, Audi A4, Convertible

Messages Page 8 of 24 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 24 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#64 of 229 sebring? by sphinx99 Jun 27, 2003 (5:57 am)
Just curious as to whether anyone here has driven both the A4 and the Sebring convertibles? I know some people truly hate domestics but I've always liked the Sebring - it has nice measures of luxury and elegance at a good price, and is a pretty soft ride. The A4 seems to offer double the luxury and elegance for double the price but also has the pretty soft ride. I don't know why, I just think of these two cars appealing to the same sort of personalities and differentiated mainly by the pocketbook of the buyer... just my thoughts. I could be totally off-base on this.
#65 of 229 justin/scipio1/sphinx99 by michaell Jun 27, 2003 (6:21 am)
Believe me, I've given a Miata a lot of thought. I've also been subtlely trying to get the wife to think Z4 or used Boxster, though that's pretty unlikely as well. The next car is the wife's, so she'll get to make the choice.   We've got a New Beetle currently; that's one of the reasons why the NB convert is high on her list. She knows the ergonomics well, and ours has held up pretty well in the 50K miles that we've driven it.   Yes, the TT is faster (180hp vs. 150hp in the NB), but it's not outright speed she's looking for. Her commute is 20 minutes on rural roads, pretty much in a straight line with only 2 stoplights. The A4, with 170hp from the 1.8T, certainly has enough "pop" to satisfy her.   The other car the wife really likes is the T-Bird, but I think (and she agrees) that it's pretty large for just two seats. I admit to not having given the Solara or Sebring a lot of thought, to be honest.   I'm hoping to get her into an NB convert next weekend, just to drive it and see what she thinks. It's possible that she'll like the A4 more -- I'm also trying to sell her on the free maintenance that Audi offers, plus the nicer experience overall.   We'll see.
#66 of 229 sphinx99 by scipio1 Jun 27, 2003 (1:55 pm)
That was precisely where I was going with that Sebring thought. For it price point I thought the Sebring was an absolutely magnificent "cruiser" convertible, for comfy beachside drives. The car was well-mannered, roomy, nicely optioned with things like a power top, and drove quite well. Soft, but quite capable of cruising very comfortably.   The Mitsu was smaller, less practical, and had a joke of a trunk. For all of it's extra intended "sportiness", the Eclipse didn't seem to do anything as well as the Sebring. I fully admit to having doubts about American car build quality, but the Sebring came the closest out of any American car to getting me to take a chance.   I felt the A4 was very similar to the Sebring, albeit with higher quality and production values. However, I revolted at the thought of paying twice as much for a similar, mild-mannered comfortable cruising convertible. I was willing to fork out for a 330ci or M3 cab at that pricing level, but for the A4 cab, I'd say if you're willing to take the hit on the badge, go with the Sebring.   One quick note: the Camry Solara is also supposed to be quite good, although I've never driven it. Pricier than the Sebring, most reviews say it's about comparable in terms of room, power and comfort, if you absolutely cannot bring yourself to buy a Chrysler.
#67 of 229 michaell by scipio1 Jun 27, 2003 (2:07 pm)
It's really funny, it sounds like everyone goes through similar steps when looking for a cabrio for their significant other. We all seem to be treading the same ground.   My wife liked the idea of the Miata a lot more than she ended up liking the car in reality. Her friend bought one when they were in grad school and she thought it was very cute.   My impression is that the Miata was a lot like a Jeep Wrangler. A lot of fun, but scraping by with the absolute minimal amount of techology possible. Throwback vehicles, if you will. As an aviator, it was the feeling I got from going from computerized multi-function displays to stepping into an East-bloc aircraft and seeing analog gauges everywhere.   Michaell, my point was that the TT and NB seem to be very, very different cars, and so I was curious as to why they were the front-runners.   As much as I'd love to beat the drum for the Z4 or Boxster, I'd say that there's a huge practicality trade-off versus a 3-series or A4. Just something to consider, and an argument in favor of the A4/NB vs a TT/Miata/Boxster/Z4...   Still, I'd hardly complain if my wife said we needed a Porsche - although I'd hold out for the 911 Cabrio.
#68 of 229 Z4?? by justin Jun 30, 2003 (6:11 am)
see, to me, there is NO need for a Z4 when Mazda makes the purest 2 seat sports car out there, for at least $15k less. so you give up an inline 6. who cares - they are gutless unless you spend money for the bigger version offered.
#69 of 229 scipio1 by michaell Jun 30, 2003 (6:38 am)
Thanks for the comments. My wife has always liked the looks of the TT. "It looks like a squashed Buggy!" is what she says. For the wife, it's more about how it looks rather than how it drives. So long as it has enough power to get out of its own way, she's fine.   Most of the time, it's just the two of us going places. The kids are almost 15 and 17, and rarely travel with us anymore. If they do, we take my Saturn L300. The wife drives her NB to and from work; occasionally, we use it on the weekends for errands, but not often.   We talked a bit over the weekend about what she's looking for. "Distinctive" was her response, "distinctive, but functional". Her NB certainly covers the first, but sort of fails on the second point.   I think the A4 Cabrio covers both points pretty well. It's not like we'll see too many of them on the roads, it's got enough rear seat room to handle the occasional passenger or our 50 pound dog, and I really, really like the looks.   We'll just have to wait and see.
#70 of 229 Is this the A4 Cabriolet board? by sjmurray2 Jul 03, 2003 (6:52 am)
Does anyone have any insight or experience with the A4 3.0 version? Really thinking hard about buying one this weekend!
#71 of 229 Like I said by scipio1 Jul 03, 2003 (11:38 am)
I took it for a long, long drive a few weeks ago.   My impressions are heavily biased by an enthusiast's orientation, but I found the A4 cab to be sluggish and uninspiring. The 3.0 engine just didn't seem powerful enough to overcome the gobs of weight that was clearly added to the car. From that perspective, it clearly wasn't a "driver's" car.   Inside, fit and finish were very good. The CVT transmission makes for a smooth, but soulless, driving experience. For a highway cruiser, it seems like a good entry-lux convertible, which I'd charcterize as sort of an upscale Sebring. (That's not an insult, I found the Sebring to be surprisingly excellent at what it does.)   The way I'd describe my impression is that it fits squarely in between the Sebring and the Mercedes CLK. The A4 doesn't seem to be the value leader (I'd call the Sebring 85% of the car for 50% of the price), but offers a non-American badged lux convertible that won't set you back $60-85,000 like a CLK will.   When I left the dealership, I felt that the A4 3.0 Cab would have been compelling at $33-38,000. At $44-48,000, it's just too much for me to justify for myself.
#72 of 229 Audi by ckelly14 Jul 27, 2003 (5:47 am)
I was impressed by the fit and finish of this car. It is incredibly solid, with no cowl shake or body roll on "inspired" diving. It does not have neck-snapping acceleration, but passing at highway speeds is excellent. We were driving 90 in the 1.8T without effort. The 3.0 has better performance off the line, but not quite the BMW. I sat in the back seat with no problem, and the head room and visibility was excellent compared to the 2003 CLK. I am waiting for a test drive in the 2004- which I have been told will be a while (see my CLK 2004 Cab post).   Fully loaded, the 3.0 would have an MSRP of 45K, but can be had for 42-43K. A 1.8 T will be around 37-38.
#73 of 229 2004 A4 Cab by bcomes Aug 03, 2003 (9:34 pm)
I just saw one on the lot. Same 3.0 engine as 2003 but was a quattro. It was loaded with the exception of the sport package and had a sticker of $47. No mention of CVT but did highlight triptonic tranny. Are these one in the same? Had a satellite receiver - something I'm looking for in my next car.

Messages Page 8 of 24 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 24 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Audi A4 Audi A4 Convertible