Sign In Join 



Fuel and Oil Additives

1246 messages,  Last post on Sep 28, 2009 at 7:37 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Fuel System, Engine, Fuel System, Oil, Diesel, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 58 of 126
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
126
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#562 of 1246
No need to ask him... by isellhondas
Sep 15, 2005 (5:58 pm)
Reply
Our HOST is a well recognized expert in all things automotive!
 
He shared his views on this earlier and I feel the same way!
 
Every time gas prices spike, these "miracle stories" abound.
 
**trying to keep my mouth shut***
#563 of 1246
Re: No need to ask him... [isellhondas] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Sep 16, 2005 (10:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: isellhondas (Sep 15, 2005 5:58 pm)

Well I'm not a chemist...I just researched the opinions of credentialed (and rather un-credentialed) people on the Internet and my conclusions were that I'd never put acetone in my gas tank based on what I read and who wrote it.
#564 of 1246
V-Power!!! by highroller
Sep 16, 2005 (6:23 pm)
Reply
Since there's Chevron's techron fuel additive for purchase off the shelves, why doesn't Shell make their own fuel additive in a bottle or can? Would it cost too much for them to pursue this kind of goal? I would definitely buy one of those(even though i do not clearly know the exact additives/chemicals they use but they sure do work pretty well for my car), with perspective to the cost of the BG44k product of course
#565 of 1246
shell is in the business of moving gas, not additives by swschrad
Sep 16, 2005 (7:16 pm)
Reply
too many SKUs to deal with, whatever, but they haven't joined the parade of little plastic bottles that replace the service bay that some oil companies have.
 
maybe it's because the shelf is already full and it's spilled into the aisles.
 
notice that V-Power is only billed in their premium gas line. where the extra detergent is probably needed to keep customers from screaming when the slower-burning premium fuel used in regular engines builds up carbon on the valves.
 
or I may just be cynical. usually the only "mechanic in a can" that works jumps when you bang hard on the door of the can and tell him/her/it to get their, uh, case back into the shop, the sports page will be the same at lunch.
#566 of 1246
Re: shell is in the business of moving gas, not additives [swschrad] by arkfirefighter
Sep 19, 2005 (8:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: swschrad (Sep 16, 2005 7:16 pm)

after reading this i had to make a say, some say it wont make a difference, dont care if ya believe me or not, but 2 ounces per 10 gallons 2 mpg gain, 96 f150 5.8, average 19mpg, been running it for several years and havent had a single problom. (actully close to 4 years to be exact). kinda reminds me when the muffler guy said i would get horrible gas millage if i removed my cats, ....lol actully got a gain from that as well...lmao..
#567 of 1246
Re: shell is in the business of moving gas, not additives [arkfirefighter] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Sep 19, 2005 (8:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: arkfirefighter (Sep 19, 2005 8:47 am)

It's not a question of us believing you, it's a question of us believing a chemist who says don't do it. Your evidence is anecdotal so we don't know if your car is a disaster waiting to happen or if your results are in any way accurate or your proportions correct or whatever.
#568 of 1246
and with the cats off, you can't sell the car by swschrad
Sep 19, 2005 (4:34 pm)
Reply
being as it is not street-legal for environmental aspect according to Federal law. in inspection states, you can't get it licensed, either. just because a car owner can remove the tires from the wheels does not make it the thing to do because it saves precious rubber.
#569 of 1246
actully you can by arkfirefighter
Sep 19, 2005 (5:03 pm)
Reply
The state i live in, you used to have to have emissions testing, they stoped making it mandatory with in the past 2 years, but have the shell of a cat mounted around the exaust pipe, so it looks like a cat, and with the acetone that was supposed to lower emisions by 60%, some how it passed emissions testing 2 years in a row, at 2 different places.. i guess if it looks like a cat maybe it will fool the emissions testing? with a 351 5.8, i dont see any other way it would pass on its own.. to me and alot of the guys at the dept, thats proof enough for us....lol oh by the way you can sell your car/truck with out the cats, all you have to state is it was that way when i bought it... its done all the time around here....lol
#570 of 1246
that's federal EPA that counts by swschrad
Sep 20, 2005 (5:36 pm)
Reply
selling a car without a functioning antipollution system when it was designed for one is a federal rap. something like $10,000 fine max. however, it's up to state licensing/inspections to catch it. that's like trying to get the plumbing fixed in FemaTown after the hurricanes roar through, but it's still the law.
#571 of 1246
Re: shell is in the business of moving gas, not additives [Mr_Shiftright] by technerd
Sep 21, 2005 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Sep 19, 2005 8:52 am)

Hmmm...
 
"believing a chemist who says don't do it."
 
And just who signs this chemist's pay check?

Messages Page 58 of 126
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
126
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement