Sign In Join 



Fuel and Oil Additives

1246 messages,  Last post on Sep 28, 2009 at 7:37 AM

You are in the Maintenance & Repair Forum. Your Host is mr_shiftright

What is this discussion about? Fuel System, Engine, Fuel System, Oil, Diesel, Fuel Efficiency (MPG)


Messages Page 124 of 125
1
...
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#1227 of 1246
Re: Coming in late here [isellhondas] by shipo
Jun 27, 2009 (10:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: isellhondas (Jun 27, 2009 3:16 pm)

Don't you think that story is more than a bit disingenuous? The fact is that Mazda expressly forbids the use of synthetic oil in their rotary engines to this day. Why? As I understand it, it keeps the engine too clean and that in turn causes the apex seals to fail.
 
Said another way, trying to use a failed rotary engine (or even hundreds of failed rotary engines) as the basis for not using synthetic oil in piston engines is completely irrelevant. At this point in time there is such a huge body of scientific and empirical data that proves how well synthetic oil performs in pistons engines, even after ten to fifteen thousand miles, that to dismiss their use for anything other than personal/emotional/religious reasons is, well, disingenuous.
 
Best regards,
Shipo
#1228 of 1246
Re: Coming in late here [shipo] by isellhondas
Jun 28, 2009 (4:56 pm)
Reply

Replying to: shipo (Jun 27, 2009 10:44 pm)

The RX-7 story happened probably 15 years ago. At the time, I had no idea that Mazda was saying not to use synthetics in their rotarys.
 
Call it disingenous if you wish,or call me old fashioned but, I just don't see the need for synthetics but that's me.
 
I don't keep my cars forever nor do I drive 40,000 miles a year so for me, there would be no real benefit.
 
I use top quality dino oil, I don't use additives and I change my oil using a quality filter every 4000-4500 miles. A couple of years ago, I pulled a valve cover on one of my cars that had over 100,000 miles and there wasn't a speck of gum or sludge to be found.
 
So, if you want to use synthetics, go for it! To me, I just can't see any benefits and, yeah, the RX-7 incident still nags at me a bit.
#1229 of 1246
Re: Coming in late here [isellhondas] by basspro
Jun 28, 2009 (6:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: isellhondas (Jun 28, 2009 4:56 pm)

I'm coming in late,but wankels are much different engine technology and it is very difficult to stretch the concept that due to a wankel engine demise all syn oil is bad and should never be used.
  That would be kinda like saying "since all engines are not wankels then I will not buy a vehicle"!!
  All that said, everyone should be able to have their opinion. Mine is that because dino oil is an inferior product to syn. engine oil and I want to change my oil as little as possible for many reasons no matter how many miles I drive a year,syn. is the best way to achieve that goal. I do not want to pull my valve covers either at a 100,000 or 200,000 plus miles and my best chance to do that is with syn oil and OA's.
  Bottom line is different strokes for different folks. We are both right, just different goals.
#1230 of 1246
Re: Coming in late here [basspro] by isellhondas
Jun 29, 2009 (5:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: basspro (Jun 28, 2009 6:29 pm)

I didn't say that all synthetic oil is bad. I just said that I don't see enough of a benefit to use it. But that's me!
 
And, I didn't pull my valve cover just to look for sludge. It had a gasket starting to leak.
 
I like the concept of clean fresh oil in my cars and that's why I change it as often as I do. I do have my opinion and that's what it is!
#1231 of 1246
'zddplus' is an additive by euphonium
Jul 01, 2009 (3:58 pm)
Reply
recommended to be used in pre cat classics. It is recommended by Mustang Monthly and when you investigate their website, you will maybe (perhaps) understand it is not Snake Oil.
#1232 of 1246
Re: 'zddplus' is an additive [euphonium] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 01, 2009 (4:15 pm)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Jul 01, 2009 3:58 pm)

I think it is snake oil, because they are making a "claim by assertion", which is, that modern oils will wear out older flat tappet engines. And this assertion, while compelling, has no basis whatsoever in fact. So the basis for needing the product is not tenable.
 
Ergo, snake oil.
#1233 of 1246
Re: 'zddplus' is an additive [Mr_Shiftright] by euphonium
Jul 01, 2009 (6:41 pm)
Reply

Replying to: Mr_Shiftright (Jul 01, 2009 4:15 pm)

Your consistent skepticism is understood & accepted.
 
Please read an extensive article on page 46, July 2009, Mustang Monthly & advise if their presentation changes your mind about the product.
 
I read, understand, bought, & installed it in my 66 Mustang GT for reasons cited in their piece.
 
Thank you for giving it your reading.
#1234 of 1246
Re: 'zddplus' is an additive [euphonium] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 02, 2009 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Jul 01, 2009 6:41 pm)

I'd like to, but I don't have that magazine, sorry.
 
I can say, though that it IS an additive, and my general attitude is that you don't "play chemist" with additives to an already good oil. "Extra" amounts of phosphorus or zinc don't necessarily offer "more" protection. More is not better chemically, although that is the "common sense" of snake oil products----that if X is good, MORE X is even better. I don't see anything scientifically-based that suggests that modern oils don't have "enough" what your old Mustang needs.
 
If people can vintage-race reliably in club events with old Mustangs on normal oils, I don't see why anyone on the street needs ZDD. Just pick the best oil for your situation and you're good to go IMO.
 
#1235 of 1246
Re: 'zddplus' is an additive [euphonium] by isellhondas
Jul 02, 2009 (7:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: euphonium (Jul 01, 2009 6:41 pm)

One person's opinion who wrote an article doesn't mean much.
 
Some people used to swear by STP too and I can't even guess at the number of engines that miserable stuff gunked up!
 
I suppose if it makes you feel better to use this stuff, it probably won't cause any harm. Any "benefit" will be a placebo effect.
#1236 of 1246
Re: 'zddplus' is an additive [isellhondas] by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Jul 02, 2009 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: isellhondas (Jul 02, 2009 7:13 am)

I'm not saying that *some* kinds of additives can't do *some* good, (certain fuel injection cleaners, some top oils, fuel stabilizers, some short-term detergents) but it's the CLAIMS they make that get my hackles up.....this "more HP, better mileage" nonsense....as if a 12 oz can of something can cure the world's energy crisis or match the benefit of a turbocharger. It's just poofery at best, fraud at worst.

Messages Page 124 of 125
1
...
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement