Sign In Join 



Gas Saving Gizmos & Gadgets

332 messages,  Last post on Jul 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Fuel System, Performance Mods, Fuel System, Truck, Sedan, SUV


Messages Page 32 of 34
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#305 of 332
A123 is a loser by steve_ HOST
Jan 08, 2009 (9:57 am)
Reply
And I'm not slamming Lawrence Welk.
 
"Real-world testing by Consumer Reports showed the best-selling plug-in conversion kit for the Toyota Prius did not come close to meeting its manufacturer's fuel-economy claim of a possible 100+ miles per gallon, the magazine says in its February issue."
 
Consumer Reports: Prius Plug-In Kit Gets Nowhere Near Maker's 100+ MPG Claim (Green Car Advisor)
#306 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [steve_] by gagrice
Jan 08, 2009 (1:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 08, 2009 9:57 am)

That is the brand of battery that burnt up a Prius last summer...The company has several of the conversions. They parked them all till it can be determined what happened. I still think Li-Ion batteries are years away from practical EV usage.
 
The first known instance of a plug-in hybrid car going up in flames occurred on June 7 in Columbia, South Carolina to a 2008 Prius that had been converted to plug-in capability for the Central Electric Power Cooperative. The conversion was performed with a Hybrids-Plus PHEV15 conversion kit that uses an A123 Systems lithium ion battery pack. The incident is still under investigation by Phoenix, Arizona-based Electric Transportation Engineering Corporation. Initial information indicates the fire may have been triggered by something related to the on-board battery charger and the car had previously experienced some mechanical issues related to that.
#307 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [gagrice] by larsb
Jan 08, 2009 (1:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 08, 2009 1:10 pm)

gary says, I still think Li-Ion batteries are years away from practical EV usage.
 
GM and Toyota will beg to differ.
#308 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [larsb] by steve_ HOST
Jan 08, 2009 (1:22 pm)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 1:12 pm)

Nothing that a few bucks won't solve.
 
A123 Systems Seeks $1.8 Billion Federal Loan For EV Battery Factories in U.S.
 
Support Builds for Hybrid, EV Battery Funding in U.S. Economic Stimulus Plan
#309 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [larsb] by gagrice
Jan 09, 2009 (6:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 08, 2009 1:12 pm)

Which model of GM or Toyota is on the showroom floor using Li-Ion batteries? GM has still not announced who will build the battery for the Volt. Panasonic is trying to buy Sanyo for their Li-Ion technology. I will believe it when I see it from GM or Toyota. They all know that longevity is the big issue they will have to face even if they feel the batteries are safe. Even NiMH has a way to go before it proves its longevity. Just five years on the oldest 2nd generation Prius. The first Prius had a battery recall. So we do not know how old they are. There was so few sold that it is insignificant compared to the current Prius design.
#310 of 332
Who will build the batteries??? [steve_] by gagrice
Jan 09, 2009 (6:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: steve_ (Jan 08, 2009 1:22 pm)

Proponents of a healthy electric vehicle industry in the U.S. have questioned the wisdom of developing vehicles that can help free the country form its dependence on foreign oil only to replace it with dependence on foreign-made batteries.
 
That was my complaint about the CFL mandate. It is just like our Congress to mandate EV cars and the only source would be outside the US, or regulations that would not allow some parts to be built in the USA.
 
If we fund the development of batteries, do the tax payers share in the profits from those developments? We funded the NiMH battery development and I do not know of any profits we have shared it.
#311 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [gagrice] by larsb
Jan 09, 2009 (6:36 am)
Reply

Replying to: gagrice (Jan 09, 2009 6:08 am)

Gary says, "Even NiMH has a way to go before it proves its longevity."
 
Hold on Pardner -
 
We've seen no major problems with the First Gen Prius batteries. The Gen 1 Prius battery electrolyte discharge problem, which Toyota addressed with “service campaign” was merely to reseal the positive battery terminals.
 
The recall for the early 2004 and 2005 Prius was not directly "battery" related:
 
Toyota announced yesterday that they have recalled 75,000 Prius Hybrids because their engines can stall due to an electrical problem. The cars involved are some 2004 and early model 2005's. Toyota's spokesman Xavier Dominicis said they started investigating when about 68 reports came through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Toyota's says it will voluntarily recall the cars and repair them for free and Dominicis stressed that "the defect isn't related to the Prius's gas-electric hybrid system and could happen in any vehicle." It's not a safety recall. NHTSA has dropped the investigation. Toyota is calling the dealer fix a special service campaign, which involves reprogramming an ECU that, under a rare combination of circumstances, had been causing the Prius's gas engine to stall. The Hybrid Synergy Drive's battery still has enough juice to get the car well off the road, and you can go up to a mile on battery power alone
 
There are no widespread failures of any generation of Prius battery. And the oldest ones are going on 11 years old now.
 
Sure, there have been some failures, but not at alarming rates.
 
Look, we all know that batteries will always eventually fail. But to call the failures a major criticism of the hybrid technology and a reason it is a failed technology is just pushing it a little too far.
 
It's about time you give up the sad old misplaced criticism of the Prius batteries, Gary. Father Time is about to start making your argument look KINDA silly.........
#312 of 332
Re: A123 is a loser [larsb] by gagrice
Jan 09, 2009 (7:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: larsb (Jan 09, 2009 6:36 am)

There are no widespread failures of any generation of Prius battery. And the oldest ones are going on 11 years old now.
 
Not sure from where you get your statistics. We have not reached 9 years on the first gen Prius that had the batteries recalled. You do not have any statistics on how many of those batteries were replaced. I doubt Toyota would ever give that information to the public. The current Prius is barely 5 years old. Toyota will probably luck out as most people that buy them are high mileage drivers. The ones I will be watching are those that only put 10k miles per year or less. They will stretch the EPA/CARB warranty to the max. So father time has another 5 years to go.
 
Along those lines. I would be real skeptical buying a Prius that has sat for 3-4 months before it gets sold. If they are not keeping those traction batteries charged they will fail prematurely. Sitting out at -10 degrees in the NE that time will be much shorter before failure. A discharged battery that gets frozen is toast.
#313 of 332
let's move it move I want to move it move it by larsb
Jan 09, 2009 (7:20 am)
Reply
Let's move this to this board, where it's more appropriate:
 
Hyb Bat
#314 of 332
Oops by larsb
Feb 05, 2009 (12:09 pm)
Reply
So much for this loser ripping people off more:
 
FTC gets sales ban on mileage booster
 
The Federal Trade Commission won a court order temporarily barring a New Jersey company from making false claims about a device that it touts as boosting automobile gas mileage by as much as 300 percent.
 
Dennis Lee is a convicted felon who has been selling a device known as the Hydro-Assist Fuel Cell for $1,000, claiming it will "turn any vehicle into a hybrid," according to the FTC complaint filed in federal court in Newark, N.J. Lee's companies, Dutchman Enterprises LLC and United Community Services of America Inc., also are named as defendants.
 
The FTC said Lee and his companies made false claims that "violate basic scientific laws and well-established physical principles."
 
U.S. District Judge Faith Hochberg granted the FTC's request on Jan. 14 for a temporary restraining order and a freeze on the companies' assets. The agency is seeking a permanent ban on the false advertisements as well as customer reimbursements. Hochberg initially sealed the case before making it public on Jan. 29.
 
Lee's companies began making false claims last year, such as boosting gas mileage on a 2007 Honda Civic from 35 miles per gallon to 85 miles, a
nd on a 2006 Mazda from 33 miles to 121 miles, according to the complaint.

Messages Page 32 of 34
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement