You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Oldsmobile Aurora
Oldsmobile Aurora: Modifications

1164 messages, Last post on May 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM
You are in the Oldsmobile Aurora Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Colin, e-mail me at greg.garnes I've done the air box mod with a K&N. It's the only way to go. You won't screw up the intake air temp and it flows just fine. I've done the RSM throttle body and of course the Corsa exhaust. The exhaust is the best. I did this at least a couple years ago and love it every day. I got it for the power, but ended up loving it for the sound. Off the line the car is not much different, but once you are moving it pulls really nice. I took on a Mustang GT (260 HP 300 torque) convertible from a roll of about 30 to 40 mph and we both just hammered it. I stayed glued to that GT. He couldn't pull an inch away from me. So, from a roll, I could equal a GT - not bad for a nearly 4,000 pound cruiser. The extra weight on the convertible probably helped me a little too. From the line I would have been toast however. The Aurora V8 produces a lot of power over a very wide rpm range, so from a roll the car is pretty strong. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: maac8124 (Aug 05, 2005 7:54 am) |
|
|
THE AURORA RECORD Oldsmobile's IRL Aurora V8 engine has competed in 50 Indy Racing League events since its introduction in January 1997. The following is a summary of its Indy Racing record to date: Victories: 48 of 50 (96%) Pole Starts: 50 of 50 (100%) Fastest Laps: 46 of 50 (92%) Laps Led: 9,708 of 10,175 (95.4%) Miles Led: 13,473 of 14,108 (95.5%) Total Racing Laps: 185,524 of 198,774 (93.3%) Total Racing Miles: 259,595 of 278,963 (93.1%) Starters: 1,203 of 1,299 (92.6%) Finishers: 710 of 755 (94%) How can I get an Aurora IRL Engine? Is it possible? Can I bore mine out to match that of the IRL version? Mmmmm, methanol sounds fun? Right? I dunno. Production Aurora V-8 - Indy Aurora V-8 Displacement: 4.0 liters (244ci) - 4.0 liters (244ci) Cylinder Angle: 90 degrees - 90 degrees Cylinder Bore Spacing: 102mm - 102mm Valvetrain: Dual overhead cams - Dual overhead cams Valves per Cylinder: 4 - 4 Camshaft Drive: Chain - Chain Cylinder Head Material: Aluminum - Aluminum Cylinder Case Material: Aluminum - Aluminum Cylinder Liners: "Dry" iron - "Dry" iron Crankshaft Design: 90 degrees - 90 degrees Fuel System: Sequential EFI - Sequential EFI Engine Controller: Delco Electronics - Delco Electronics Maximum rpm: 6,400 - 10,500 Horsepower: 250hp Fuel: Unleaded gasoline - Methanol Bore Diameter: 87mm - 93mm Crankshaft Stroke: 84mm - 73.4mm Deck Height: 8.84" - 8.1" Compression Ratio: 10.3:1 - 13-15:1 Throttle System: Throttle Body - Individual Runner Lubrication System: Wet Sump - Dry Sump So how can I get my engine close to its IRL cousin without completely ruining it?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: cmcmanus (Sep 07, 2005 2:54 am) I have read that no one rebuilds Northstar engines -- the expense is too high. 0.010" oversize pistons and rings may be available. But boring out from 87mm to 93mm is not going to work. New iron liners would be required, and I do not know if that is possible for less than megabucks. As you probably have already found out, available performance equipment for Aurora is minimal. K&N filter and airbox mods are cheap and will give you a few horsepower. Corsa exhaust will cost about $1000 and give you ~10 horsepower. The RSM 80mm throttle body may be good for 3-5 horsepower. Altogether, you may be able to get 20-25 horsepower increase from these intake and exhaust mods. In the 5 years I have owned my '97, I have thought a lot about performance increases. I think that swapping in a 4.6 liter Cadillac engine may be reasonable, although expensive. The late 1990s STS output is 300hp at 6000 rpm and 295 lb-ft at 4400 rpm; the SLS is 275hp at 5600 rpm and 300 lb-ft at 4000 rpm. Our Auroras (250hp at 5600 rpm and 260 lb-ft at 4400 rpm) fall between the two Cadillac engines when normalized for the displacement difference. People have claimed that the Cadillac-to-Aurora swap cannot be done because of motor mount differences. May be true; I do not know of a proof of existence. Swapping in the STS cams may be possible for a few hp at higher rpm, but the expense and labor of 4 cams would likely be prohibitive. If you are adventurous, nitrous oxide is an option. On one of the Cadillac forums there was talk of developing a turbocharger kit. I do not know if that ever happened. I wonder if the new Impala/Monte Carlo 303-hp motor is a possibility. Les |
|
| It would be easier to get your motor closer to it's IMSA cousin. That record is more impressive in my opinion, because they had more competition. And that motor is much closer to your production one. Olds has a Motorsports Handbook that can help. But a racing engine in a sedan is an unlikely proposition. | |
|
I jsut found this out tonight thought I'd share. The engine is a 4.0 liter twin-turbocharged aluminum 32-valve V8. GM Motorsports has taken the experience from successful IMSA and IRL efforts and created the new Northstar. Key partnerships with McLaren racing engines and IHI turbos will advance the expertise in turbo package development. Boosted to 1500 mbar (44.3 in. Hg), testing has resulted in very high torque, and a wide flat maximum power range.
|
|
|
|
|
There are two current eBay auctions for 2001-2003 Aurora 17" chrome wheels. I have absolutely no affiliation with the seller. Les |
|
|
Replying to: cmcmanus (Sep 26, 2005 1:48 am) |
|
| I just got a 2002 without the Bose system and am upgrading the speakers to Polks. I have 6X9 and 6.75" speakers and could use some advice on the proper wiring and how to get at the speakers to replace them in both locations. Thanks. | |
You are here:
Forums
Sedans
Oldsmobile Aurora
Oldsmobile Aurora: Modifications
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2003 Oldsmobile Aurora



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats