You are here: Forums Wagons Station Wagon vs SUV

Station Wagon vs SUV

1426 messages,  Last post on Feb 21, 2007 at 8:37 AM

You are in the Wagons Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Wagon

Messages Page 85 of 143 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 143 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#836 of 1426 pennzoil "roadside rescue" by silverpilot03 Jun 24, 2003 (2:20 pm)
I did a google and found this for 24.95 CANADIAN. I thought I saw this at Walmart not that long ago.
#837 of 1426 Yes, rescue by boaz47 Jun 24, 2003 (2:34 pm)
about 14 bucks here. I have no idea how it works and haven't found anyone that has tried it.
#838 of 1426 by ballistic Jun 24, 2003 (3:10 pm)
Silverpilot and Boaz - exactly what I was looking for. Don't know why none of my searches unearthed it. Thanks!   jb
#839 of 1426 by subewannabe Jun 27, 2003 (8:38 am)
aint misbehavin...are you? by subewannabe Jun 27, 2003 (12:34 pm) I stopped by my nearest subaru dealer yeaterday, prestige subaru in Asheville( which happens to be the biggest volume dealer in the southeast with a really great service crew that loves aftermarket tuning). they have sold 4 of the 6 XT's they received last week, and agreed to sell me whatever i want on the VIP plan at invoice . the salesman suggested taking the savings on the price of the car and getting the leather, premium sound, more sound insulation and even a sunroof if i want it on a MT through their aftermarket detail shop, under the MSRP on the Premium Package , and get better leather in the process. they had a 2003 silver XS with the premium package that included a light gray leather, and it looked so much better , IMHO, than the dark gray you can get in the XT. Likewise the beige leather in the cayenne red XS. the salesman offered his personal opinion that the AT is more than adequate performance, though, unless i was a MT purist.   one a side note, the seats on the XT are the same shape and structure as the NA forester, i.e. no meaningful thigh and side bolsters like the WRX. I really like the WRX seats and LOVE, not like, the pneumatic adjustable seat bolsters and lumbar supports on the 6-way electric adjustable leather seats, driver and passenger side,in my '94 explorer.maybe i can get an aftermarket seat set rather than just putting leather on the existing seats.( i actually considered pulling the explorer seats out and putting them in an XT and hook them up to the seat heater circuit, but i dont think that will work.)      On a serious note....in an amazing display of restraint, i turned down repeated offers to take his remaining 2 XT's on test drives, one Black AT , the other a Red MT. I decided to "do the right thing", considering all the posts in here about getting a truly "virgin" new XT and making sure it was not abused in the break in period. I was also reacting to my shock, and anger, after reading a few posts of folks who test drove XTs from dealers' very limited supply, just out of curiosity and with absolutely no intent to buy it, then blatantly ignored the manuf. recomm. break in procedures by pushing the cars to redline! somebody else can later buy the car that they have abused, and wonder why their car is losing compression at high RPM, etc., and that dealer who trusted them to test drive a car responsibly can try to appease an unhappy owner of a "new " XT and figure out whats wrong with that car and try to fix it.     the posts in here from new BUYERS like chassol and ballistic have been worth their weight in gold to people who are considering buying a new XT or just subaru enthusiasts. now we also have the reviews in the car mags coming out, driving cars provided by Subaru to be driven to the limits. if you are not buying, maybe you should give some thought to whether you would want to be the person who bought the car you test drove. Mark
#840 of 1426 then there's the 2005 legacy gt wagon by subewannabe Jun 27, 2003 (6:31 pm)
supposedly available 8-9 months from now with maybe 280 bhp, the new legacy gt turbo 2.5 awd wagon looks like a lot of high-end performance in a true wagon configuration. but is the debate over high end performance or the grunt work capability of SUV's? in the meantime , the torque numbers coming to the fore for the forester XT suggest some capabilities we havent imagined in a compact SUV. such tough choices. mark
#841 of 1426 I can't help by boaz47 Jun 27, 2003 (8:45 pm)
it. People that know me know I have to ask. A GT wagon? A grand touring wagon? Can you have a wagon that is a GT or even 4 doors and a GT? How far behind is a Mini-van GT? I had trouble even saying sport and sedan in the same paragraph let alone sentence before. Can I go to dinner with some of my old friends who I wrenched for when we were club racing a 914-6 and say, I rode in a Subaru GT wagon today? I will get spit on if they are drinking something you know? If SUV has become a marketing term and has little real world meaning how much meaning can GT and wagon have?   Ok, got that off of my chest.
#842 of 1426 Term: GT wagon by rsholland Jun 28, 2003 (6:58 am)
An oxymoron? I don't think so.   Touring, especially overnight touring, usually also means bringing along some luggage. That being the case, what better vehicle to use than a wagon. Now if you include sporty handling and excellent power and comfort, what better vehicle is there than a wagon?   Bob
#843 of 1426 GT:Grand Turismo by li_sailor Jun 28, 2003 (9:16 am)
The original meaning (pre motor vehicle, then early motor vehicle) of the term Grand Turismo may have been related to "touring" but long ago, it was morphed into a race car term. See this link. AFAIK, that's the only way it's been used for cars since the GTO and Ferrari (Grand Turismo Omologato).   So (good heavens), I may have to agree with boaz47 here It does seem a bit odd to refer to a tall wagon (or a small SUV) as "GT". I understand it has performance to earn the term, but it seems odd.   Has anyone driven the Forester GT and a sports car and could give a honest comparison of the handling of the two?   I haven't test driven it myself yet (I hope to soon, in addition to the GSX wagon) or I'd give my own comparison of them to the RSX, which I just test drove.
#844 of 1426 I know by boaz47 Jun 28, 2003 (9:49 am)
I can be narrow on some of these things. Sports cars used to be street versions of race cars. Mostly roadsters. Then we got the coupe designed for racing so we called it a sports coupe. The GT class also came out of a racing back ground. At this point I began to look askance at the term "sport" when attached to something that didn't come from sport in the first place. OK the GT was a sports car that had some room behind the front seat. The sports Coupe could also be a 2+2. A sports Sedan could simply be a two door with a post behind the driver and the back. But 4 door sports sedans? What is the first thing any racing team would do if they were going to race such a thing? Gut the rear door and seal it. It should be nothing more than an outline with just a skin covering the opening to avoid the weight of a door. But they did decide to race Sedans so I bit my tongue. Sport wagon detracted from the word attached to the car and screamed Madison Avenue to "me" and many of my friends. We would accept sporty buy Sport was quickly losing its meaning. I find the GT class in sports car racing very competitive and is one of my favorite classes. I like it better than the DP class. I even like GTS. Now picture what a enthusiast has to feel when someone decides to attach GT to a wagon. Picture the classic GTs you remember. Ferrari, Porsche, Corvette, Mustang GT 350 and 500. Ford GT-40. Wield a big square box on the back of any of those and try to convince any of us it is still a GT?   No wonder they feel they can call a tall wagon a SUV and we will buy it. We will buy just about anything they tell us. Next Winnabago will be adding a wing on the back, putting 30 inch rims on with low profile tires and calling itself the Winnie GT 30. Because they put a heavy duty sway bar on it does not make it a sports car.   It is the height of hypocrisy to condemn SUV drivers or owners for getting more vehicle they need just because of "image" and then turning around and buying into the image of the name GT for our family grocery getter. Because when a wagon runs into a true GT in the mountains or canyons and they driver of that GT has any driving ability at all the wagon will be shown for what it truly is. A wagon with a GT sticker. Makes the kids with their type R stickers seem legitimate.   Forgive my rant, it is not aimed at any person in the room, only at how Madison Avenue is making Orwell's book come true. They can get us to believe anything if they just say it with a straight face.
#845 of 1426 li_sailor by boaz47 Jun 28, 2003 (9:52 am)
In fewer words you have made my point. It isn't how they handle compared to a full sized SUV but how they handle compared to a GT. And it is ok, I see your points often as well. *S*

Messages Page 85 of 143 1 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 ... 143 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Wagons Station Wagon vs SUV