You are here: Forums Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Forester Subaru Forester vs Toyota RAV4

Subaru Forester vs Toyota RAV4

617 messages,  Last post on Nov 05, 2008 at 2:00 PM

You are in the Subaru Forester Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Subaru Forester, Toyota RAV4, SUV

Messages Page 2 of 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 63 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#6 of 617 NHTSA Rollover results - '01 RAV by suvshopper4 Jul 24, 2001 (10:40 am)
Update on my post #5:   I just checked their site again- NHTSA has rated the '01 RAV4 at 3 stars (both FWD and 4WD) for the rollover test, the same as the Forester and many other SUV's. None were rated higher, a few were lower. www.nhtsa.dot.gov, then look for 'rollover resistance ratings' then 'rated vehicle details'. I have now uncrossed my fingers.   ejp
#7 of 617 rollover test.. hardly by alpha01 Jul 27, 2001 (10:32 pm)
that rollover test is a calculation, not any dyanmic examination of a vehicles resistance (or lack thereof) to rolling over in every day driving. useless IMO.
#8 of 617 alpha01 - better? by suvshopper4 Jul 28, 2001 (2:58 am)
alpha01: Do you know of a better rollover test, one you consider to be accurate?
#9 of 617 by ateixeira Jul 28, 2001 (9:41 am)
Actually, it's not just a calculation. They put the vehicles on a ramp and then incline them until two wheels tip off the ground.   It is just a static measurement, and I agree a dynamic one would be far more useful.   -juice
#10 of 617 Rollover Tests ... by rnesel Jul 29, 2001 (6:50 pm)
For what it's worth...Recently conducted my own "unofficial" stability test on both the RAV4 and the Forester. Had fully expected to buy the RAV4 til I tried gentle, on-street swerving during the test drive...felt a definite, somewhat unnerving rocking motion. The 2001 model did better than the 1999. Tried the same thing in the Forester and it felt solid.
#11 of 617 by ateixeira Jul 30, 2001 (7:04 am)
The Click and Clack (sp?) guys mentioned the RAV4 felt succeptible to cross winds, similar to your impression.   At the limit, though, the tires give. It would seem pretty difficult to actually roll one.   -juice
#12 of 617 Click and Clack by suvshopper4 Jul 30, 2001 (12:54 pm)
The Tappet Brothers comment (that I read) about the RAV in a crosswind was for the previous generation RAV. I don't know if Click and Clack have reviewed the new RAV yet.   ejp
#13 of 617 by ateixeira Jul 30, 2001 (1:04 pm)
Good point. That's true.   -juice
#14 of 617 by kens Aug 01, 2001 (1:31 pm)
Rita,   The Forester feel's more solid when "swerving" because it has a lower center of gravity. The Forester uses a boxer engine that, unlike the inline-4 used in the RAV4, lies low in the engine bay.   Ken
#15 of 617 While shopping by scape2 Jan 01, 2002 (8:39 am)
I drove both. A Forester L and a RAV4 L. Both pretty much optioned the same. Forester would have been my choice between these 2. RAV4 was buzzy and did not have the power the Forester had. Interior was also very cheap in my opinion.

Messages Page 2 of 63 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 63 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Wagons Subaru Crew Subaru Forester Subaru Forester vs Toyota RAV4