Sign In Join 



Toyota 4Runner vs Toyota Highlander

74 messages,  Last post on Jan 30, 2009 at 10:13 AM

You are in the Toyota 4Runner Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Car Safety, Fuel Efficiency (MPG), SUV


Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#25 of 74
?? by nippononly
Nov 26, 2002 (10:55 pm)
Reply
SR5 highlanders rarely top $30K, and have to be fully loaded to do so. If you want a 2WD, their range is around $28K. 4Runner sport V-8 starts at $34K, so that is $6K, not 3. Perhaps you meant the SR5, which is $30K, and is only about $2K more than HL with the V-6.
 
But in that case, you do not get the sport suspension in the Runner, and the mileage is 15/19 Runner vs 18/22 HL. As soon as you option in the JBL sound system in the Runner, the price gap widens again.
 
It remains to be seen (and varies widely around the country) whether good deals can be had on the Runner right now, given its newness, whereas dealers are bargaining on HLs.
#26 of 74
Pricing by essweb
Nov 27, 2002 (5:25 am)
Reply
4 Runner V8 Sport + DJ + GY = 29986 (invoice)
 
HL V6 SR5 + AG + CQ + HE + VD +BE = 26688 (invoice)
 
In order to get the VSC and Side Airbag in HL, you probably have to order all those other things. And 4 runner does offer more standard features like privacy glass, remote keyless and stuff.
#27 of 74
Help me Decide - 03 4Runner vs. 03 Highlander by mabucfan
Mar 17, 2003 (12:16 pm)
Reply
I have to call in the experts here! We are down to models in our search for a new vehicle: the 4Runner and the Highlander. The reviews for the Highlander have been spectacular, and I enjoyed the ride. Drove the 4Runner yesterday - and really enjoyed that ride as well!
 
The issues I have, and what I'm looking for advice on:
 
1. My key considerations for the new vehicle: storage space (I've been driving a Civic for 7 years) and enhanced handling in inclement weather - is the AWD a better option, or 4WD? I am not a hardcore off roader.
 
2. On the 4Runner - can you stay in 4WD with the SR5 V8? If I stick with the V6, are the 4WD modes easy to understand, and get into while driving?
 
Any help here is appreciated.
 
Thanks!
#28 of 74
Highlander vs. 4 Runner by twobrowns
Mar 17, 2003 (1:58 pm)
Reply
I recentlly purchased an 03 highlander. Prior to the purchased I test drove both back to back and I prefered the car like handling of the Highlander and the better gas milage and I would seldom get off road . The 4runner is a terific veh. and I am certain I would have been satisfied with this veh.
#29 of 74
Highlander vs. 4 Runner by tfuzz
Mar 17, 2003 (5:53 pm)
Reply
I traded a 2001 Highlander for a 2003 4Runner. Both are excellent vehicles. I would not have traded except 1) I prefer a truck based SUV for towing our pop-up camper, 2) occasionally I need to go through a blizzard (drifting snow) in the middle of the night to get to work, 3) I expect to do some light off roading (fire roads, that sort of thing) more often in the future, and 4) I frequently carry two dogs in the back and like to be able to roll the back window down part way for better ventilation (while parked).
 
The HL was a little more comfortable (for me anyway--definitely more car-like), had better gas mileage, and I thought was a little more fun to drive. It was also cheaper to insure and had lower property taxes. I didn't notice a whole lot of difference in interior room between the two, but you can check the exact measurements in the specs. If space is your main concern you might also check out the Honda Pilot. The HL did just fine in inclement weather, even ice and snow (but doesn't have the ground clearance or locking differential for really deep snow). If you want/need a truck based SUV the Runner would probably fit your need better. If you want/need a car based SUV look at the HL. Except reasons mentioned above I would probably rather have my HL back. However, for a truck the Runner is VERY nice and you don't give up much comfort (for highway cruising) at all.
#30 of 74
mabucfan by nippononly
Mar 17, 2003 (9:23 pm)
Reply
1. split decision - Runner has more storage space, but if all you will be facing is rain and snow on pavement, the AWD is all you really need. The edge goes to HL - save yourself a few $$.
 
2. On the V-8 Runner, you are in 4WD all the time. On the V-6, you go to 2WD (rear drive) by pressing a button on the dash - it is very easy and you will not even notice it.
 
Runner is much heavier, will drive as such, and will get worse gas mileage. BUT if interior space is your number one priority, it does have an advantage over HL.
#31 of 74
Highlander vs. 4 Runner by gklatv
Mar 18, 2003 (6:42 am)
Reply
I own '00 4Runner and '03 HL. Most likely you will be happier with HL in a long run - quieter and more comfortable car-like ride, plenty of interior room and cargo space, AWD system with V6, better gas mileage. I love my 4Runner, but prefer wife's HL going places with family.
#32 of 74
gklatv-4Runner/Highlander by andrews928
Mar 18, 2003 (7:33 pm)
Reply
If you drive an 03 4Runner I think you would agree it is a much nicer vehicle than the 00 4Runner. I'm sure there is a big differnce in ride quality between your 00 4Runner and your 03 HL but the difference(after driving both 03 models) in my opinion is insignificant.
#33 of 74
HL by wwest
Mar 18, 2003 (7:46 pm)
Reply
is not AWD, not even close.
 
Well, it really is, but only with good traction.
#34 of 74
just can't quit, huh?! by nippononly
Mar 19, 2003 (7:42 am)
Reply

Messages Page 4 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement