Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Honda Accord Prices Paid and Buying Experience
24564 messages, Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 4:35 PM
You are in the Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Forum. Your Hosts are car_man & kyfdx
|
Replying to: tcvb22 (Nov 30, 2004 4:50 pm) Are you looking for 4 dr ? I paid 25,660 OTD (7%) tax for 05 4dr ex v6 
|
|
|
Replying to: jag6 (Nov 20, 2004 4:53 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: gary4x4 (Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm) The bottom line is that you MUST test drive both of them before buying if it really matters to you. I did not test drive both prior to buying my 2004 Accord EX-L 4 sedan with AT because it was fast enough for me. I finally drove a V6 a few weeks ago and have no regrets about buying the 4 cylinder car. If you expect to carry many passengers, fill the trunk with heavy luggage, pull a trailer, or pass slow vehicles on 2 lane roads, then perhaps the V6 would be the better choice. I think most people would be well served by the 4 which is very quick, smooth, quiet, and refined...........Richard |
|
I was able to get a Honda Accord 2004 LX AT sedan for 17,500 (18,300 OTD). I know that this is after the fact, but was this a good deal? I was kinda winging it with my negotiations. Basically, I'm a first time car buyer and I was solo.
|
|
|
Replying to: gary4x4 (Nov 30, 2004 4:58 pm) Consumer Guide lists fuel mileage for BOTH engines at the same 22.4mpg in mostly city driving and 26.1 mostly highway. Personally, I'm doing a little better than that with my 4-cylinder at 28mpg mixed city/highway. Besides price, the only downsides I can see for the V6 are slightly worsened handling (reported in Edmund's Editor's Review of the 2003), a timing belt which has to be replaced at 105,000 miles (the 4-cylinder uses a chain instead), and the low and mid-range torque is less than I'd expect given the 240hp-rating. In my experience, downsides for the 4-cylinder are some vibration and "thrumming" below 2,000rpm. Also, I can definitely tell when the A/C compressor is on - something I'm sure I'd notice less, if at all, with a bigger engine. Both are great engines but I'd say it comes down to whether value or luxury/performance is your priority. There's little doubt that the 4-cylinder represents a better absolute value. However, even a fully-loaded EX-V6 is a great value in a mid-size, near-luxury performance sedan. When test driving both engines, I'd encourage you to keep the A/C on and note the low-end, off-idle differences the feel of each. In handling, the heavier V-6 is a trade off between feeling more substantial and yet also understeering more. I'm confident that a majority of buyers would choose the V-6 if cost wasn't an issue. |
|
| Traction control (my driveway is steep and snowy). TD | |
|
Replying to: gloh (Dec 01, 2004 5:13 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: dschek (Nov 30, 2004 7:06 pm) Yes I'm looking for a 4 dr EX V6. Can you tell me where you got that price and the zipe code. Thanks.
|
|
|
Replying to: 3c3 (Dec 01, 2004 10:30 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: gloh (Dec 01, 2004 12:25 pm) For 2005, the Accord now has front, side, and side-curtain airbags standard across the model line (along with variable inflation force, dual-threshold deployment, and out-of-position sensors). With all six airbags, the IIHS rated the Accord "Good" (low risk of injury) in the same severe crash. Why were you eager to buy a left-over 2004 model without side-curtain airbags?
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Prices Paid: Buying & Leasing Experiences Honda Accord Prices Paid and Buying Experience
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Honda Accord
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
